You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com> on 2023/05/02 14:04:50 UTC
Re: License question when including other ASF projects
Can anyone give us a tip regarding this one?
Thanks,
—alex
> On 30. Apr 2023, at 18:13, Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Dominik,
>
> Sry for bugging, any chance you know how to tune the license check that the Eclipse License passes?
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4845087374/jobs/8633774880#step:6:1151
>
> It’s merged, but we’d love to have a green build :)
>
> Cheers,
> —Alex
>
>
>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Dominik,
>>
>> Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> —Alex
>>
>>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer <ri...@fzi.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see Category B under [1]).
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Dominik
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM
>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: License question when including other ASF projects
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right)
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117
>>>
>>> How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false alarm?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help,
>>> —Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
Re: License question when including other ASF projects
Posted by Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com>.
Hey Chris,
Thank you, solved that. Wasn’t sure about the licenses, but as they come from Calcite we just whitelisted Eclipse.
Cheers,
—Alex
> On 3. May 2023, at 14:24, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> sorry for the late response ... I also checked and the Eclipse Distribution Licence 1.0 seems to be Category A and EPL 2.0 cat B, so it should be ok as long as you only have dependencies to it.
>
> However I don’t know the plugin that you are using, so I can’t really help about how to resolve false-positives ... might have a look at it thoug.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com>
> Datum: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2023 um 16:05
> An: general@incubator.apache.org <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: License question when including other ASF projects
> Can anyone give us a tip regarding this one?
>
> Thanks,
> —alex
>
>> On 30. Apr 2023, at 18:13, Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Dominik,
>>
>> Sry for bugging, any chance you know how to tune the license check that the Eclipse License passes?
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4845087374/jobs/8633774880#step:6:1151
>>
>> It’s merged, but we’d love to have a green build :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> —Alex
>>
>>
>>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Dominik,
>>>
>>> Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> —Alex
>>>
>>>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer <ri...@fzi.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see Category B under [1]).
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Dominik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM
>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: License question when including other ASF projects
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right)
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117
>>>>
>>>> How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false alarm?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help,
>>>> —Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
AW: License question when including other ASF projects
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Alex,
sorry for the late response ... I also checked and the Eclipse Distribution Licence 1.0 seems to be Category A and EPL 2.0 cat B, so it should be ok as long as you only have dependencies to it.
However I don’t know the plugin that you are using, so I can’t really help about how to resolve false-positives ... might have a look at it thoug.
Chris
Von: Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2023 um 16:05
An: general@incubator.apache.org <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: License question when including other ASF projects
Can anyone give us a tip regarding this one?
Thanks,
—alex
> On 30. Apr 2023, at 18:13, Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Dominik,
>
> Sry for bugging, any chance you know how to tune the license check that the Eclipse License passes?
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4845087374/jobs/8633774880#step:6:1151
>
> It’s merged, but we’d love to have a green build :)
>
> Cheers,
> —Alex
>
>
>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Dominik,
>>
>> Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> —Alex
>>
>>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer <ri...@fzi.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see Category B under [1]).
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Dominik
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz <al...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM
>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: License question when including other ASF projects
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right)
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117
>>>
>>> How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false alarm?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help,
>>> —Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>