You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@harmony.apache.org by "Gregory Shimansky (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/03/05 07:20:51 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HARMONY-2086) [drlvm][thread]
java.util.concurrent.atomic natives misses VMSupportsCS8 function
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477918 ]
Gregory Shimansky commented on HARMONY-2086:
--------------------------------------------
So does everyone agree that we should make an exception to this method and implement it directly in VM instead of creating some sort of a kernel class? I tried to start a discussion in [1] about this issue, but no one answered.
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.harmony.devel/24056
> [drlvm][thread] java.util.concurrent.atomic natives misses VMSupportsCS8 function
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HARMONY-2086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2086
> Project: Harmony
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: DRLVM
> Reporter: Nikolay Kuznetsov
> Assigned To: weldon washburn
> Attachments: atomics.patch, h2086.patch, Test.java
>
>
> java.util.concurrent.atomic natives misses VMSupportsCS8 function, which indicates whether underlying JVM supports lockless CompareAndSet for longs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.