You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apachecon-discuss@apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2016/09/18 01:30:03 UTC
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Hi,
I just when through a large number of comparisons for ApacheCon and at the end it shows a list of 174 talks but they all have 0 votes is this expected/correct?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 09/20/2016 05:29 AM, Sergio Fern�ndez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume
>> assume I don\u2019t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any
>> suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
>>
>
> Web site says that "CFP notifications out Sept 26", so I guess couple of
> days before at least...
Yeah, it's not entirely clear what the scheduling process is going to
look like this time around, so if we can get through the reviewing
process by end of day Friday, that'll give me the weekend to do that.
However ... realistically ... I am working dish crew at the St. Andrew
Church Heritage Festival allllllll weekend, and so won't actually get
any scheduling done. So you have the weekend to work on reviewing too,
if you need it, and I'll start on scheduling first thing Monday morning.
I don't actually expect to hit the 26th notification deadline, but I'll try.
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Justin,
I expect that there will be lead time needed before that to assess the
evaluations done.
Are you going to attend?
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume
> > assume I don’t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any
> > suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
> >
>
> Web site says that "CFP notifications out Sept 26", so I guess couple of
> days before at least...
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
>
> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume
> assume I don’t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any
> suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
>
Web site says that "CFP notifications out Sept 26", so I guess couple of
days before at least...
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Bob Paulin <bo...@bobpaulin.com>.
Well played. Not a bug but a feature ;).
- Bob
On 9/20/2016 12:39 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 07:37 PM, Bob Paulin wrote:
>> Hi I noticed that if I don't get through the reviews for the day, leave
>> and come back that the % reviewed goes back to 0%. Is that expected?
>>
> Yes, it's all a mental ruse of sort, to get you to review as many talks
> as possible :) we are evuuuul.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>> - Bob
>>
>>
>> On 9/20/2016 7:25 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>> Me neither.
>>>
>>> Pierre Smits
>>>
>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
>>> OFBiz based solutions & services
>>>
>>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Justin
>>>>
>>>> I asked Rich the review date question the other day and he said a 23rd
>>>> September. (BTW I've been working my way through a few combinations but
>>>> won't get anywhere near 30,000!)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Sharan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 20/09/16 11:26, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there,
>>>>>> however that only works for the conference administrators as set by
>>>>>> Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume
>>>>> assume I don\u2019t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any
>>>>> suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Justin
>>>>>
>
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 09/20/2016 07:37 PM, Bob Paulin wrote:
> Hi I noticed that if I don't get through the reviews for the day, leave
> and come back that the % reviewed goes back to 0%. Is that expected?
>
Yes, it's all a mental ruse of sort, to get you to review as many talks
as possible :) we are evuuuul.
With regards,
Daniel.
>
> - Bob
>
>
> On 9/20/2016 7:25 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>> Me neither.
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
>> OFBiz based solutions & services
>>
>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Justin
>>>
>>> I asked Rich the review date question the other day and he said a 23rd
>>> September. (BTW I've been working my way through a few combinations but
>>> won't get anywhere near 30,000!)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sharan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20/09/16 11:26, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there,
>>>>> however that only works for the conference administrators as set by
>>>>> Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :)
>>>>>
>>>> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume
>>>> assume I don\u2019t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any
>>>> suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Bob Paulin <bo...@bobpaulin.com>.
Hi I noticed that if I don't get through the reviews for the day, leave
and come back that the % reviewed goes back to 0%. Is that expected?
- Bob
On 9/20/2016 7:25 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Me neither.
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin
>>
>> I asked Rich the review date question the other day and he said a 23rd
>> September. (BTW I've been working my way through a few combinations but
>> won't get anywhere near 30,000!)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sharan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/09/16 11:26, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there,
>>>> however that only works for the conference administrators as set by
>>>> Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :)
>>>>
>>> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume
>>> assume I don\u2019t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any
>>> suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Me neither.
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Justin
>
> I asked Rich the review date question the other day and he said a 23rd
> September. (BTW I've been working my way through a few combinations but
> won't get anywhere near 30,000!)
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
>
> On 20/09/16 11:26, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there,
>>> however that only works for the conference administrators as set by
>>> Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :)
>>>
>> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume
>> assume I don’t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any
>> suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>
>
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Justin
I asked Rich the review date question the other day and he said a 23rd
September. (BTW I've been working my way through a few combinations but
won't get anywhere near 30,000!)
Thanks
Sharan
On 20/09/16 11:26, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there,
>> however that only works for the conference administrators as set by
>> Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :)
> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume assume I dont have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there,
> however that only works for the conference administrators as set by
> Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :)
Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume assume I don’t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 09/18/2016 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just when through a large number of comparisons for ApacheCon and at the end it shows a list of 174 talks but they all have 0 votes is this expected/correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there,
however that only works for the conference administrators as set by
Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :)
With regards,
Daniel.