You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@aurora.apache.org by "Maxim Khutornenko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/22 23:32:17 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (AURORA-1332) Updater does not skip already updated instances with /INSTANCES option.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Maxim Khutornenko updated AURORA-1332:
--------------------------------------
    Description: 
The new updater is too restrictive when processing /INSTANCES option. E.g. if instance 0 is already updated but the client sends /0-3 range, the entire request is rejected with: "updateOnlyTheseInstances contains instances irrelevant to the update: [0]".

https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/2dc1d59f1e772e220b3bfb26480c3b90c688800f/src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/thrift/SchedulerThriftInterface.java#L1175-L1181

  was:The new updater is too restrictive when processing /INSTANCES option. E.g. if instance 0 is already updated but the client sends /0-3 range, the entire request is rejected with: "updateOnlyTheseInstances contains instances irrelevant to the update: [0]".


> Updater does not skip already updated instances with /INSTANCES option.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1332
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1332
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Scheduler
>            Reporter: Maxim Khutornenko
>
> The new updater is too restrictive when processing /INSTANCES option. E.g. if instance 0 is already updated but the client sends /0-3 range, the entire request is rejected with: "updateOnlyTheseInstances contains instances irrelevant to the update: [0]".
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/2dc1d59f1e772e220b3bfb26480c3b90c688800f/src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/thrift/SchedulerThriftInterface.java#L1175-L1181



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)