You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu> on 2007/08/01 00:02:09 UTC
Re: Source in the binary release
On 7/31/07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> Also - the resources need to be included in the jars (they have the
> message bundles, etc.).
>
The resource are already in the jars, so we don't need to add them in
this step. Just the source files need to be added.
-Adam
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
> attach javadocs, to now also mention
> running those scripts to attach the source.
>
I updated the README file for the source distribution. Not sure where
else we have documentation relating to the source dist - on the
website?
-Adam
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Marshall Schor wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> Michael Baessler wrote:
>>
>>> Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>
>>>> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
>>>> attach javadocs, to now also mention
>>>> running those scripts to attach the source.
>>>>
>>> Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I
>>> would
>>> like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out
>>> of the door.
>>>
>>> -- Michael
>>>
>>
>> I have added a short paragraph to the Eclipse setup section. If more
>> documentation is needed elsewhere, feel free to add it. I'd like to
>> build a release candidate tomorrow morning and start the vote on it,
>> if that's ok with everybody (which means I would like to close
>> UIMA-499).
>>
> I updated the ref javadoc chapter also. I think that's all that's
> needed. +1 to closing 499 now.
Thanks!
-- Michael
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>
>> Marshall Schor wrote:
>>
>>> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
>>> attach javadocs, to now also mention
>>> running those scripts to attach the source.
>>>
>> Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I would
>> like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out
>> of the door.
>>
>> -- Michael
>>
>
> I have added a short paragraph to the Eclipse setup section. If more
> documentation is needed elsewhere, feel free to add it. I'd like to
> build a release candidate tomorrow morning and start the vote on it,
> if that's ok with everybody (which means I would like to close UIMA-499).
>
I updated the ref javadoc chapter also. I think that's all that's
needed. +1 to closing 499 now.
-Marshall
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
>> attach javadocs, to now also mention
>> running those scripts to attach the source.
> Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I would
> like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out
> of the door.
>
> -- Michael
I have added a short paragraph to the Eclipse setup section. If more
documentation is needed elsewhere, feel free to add it. I'd like to
build a release candidate tomorrow morning and start the vote on it,
if that's ok with everybody (which means I would like to close UIMA-499).
--Thilo
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Marshall Schor wrote:
> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
> attach javadocs, to now also mention
> running those scripts to attach the source.
Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I would
like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out
of the door.
-- Michael
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Adam Lally wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
>
>> I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes
>> using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else
>> we need to do?
>>
>
> OK with me to close it.
>
We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
attach javadocs, to now also mention
running those scripts to attach the source.
-Marshall
> -Adam
>
>
>
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On 8/1/07, Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
> I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes
> using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else
> we need to do?
OK with me to close it.
-Adam
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Adam Lally wrote:
>>> On 7/31/07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Also - the resources need to be included in the jars (they have the
>>>> message bundles, etc.).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The resource are already in the jars, so we don't need to add them in
>>> this step. Just the source files need to be added.
>>>
>> oops - I didn't look closely at the -u flag. I thought you were
>> re-building & replacing the jars.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>
> I did some tests on linux and after adding
> #!/bin/sh
> to the first line, all seems to be fine.
>
> -- Michael
>
>
I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes
using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else
we need to do?
I think we have to update the release notes to add this issue. I already
changed the fix version number of that issue to 2.2.
-- Michael
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Marshall Schor wrote:
> Adam Lally wrote:
>> On 7/31/07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Also - the resources need to be included in the jars (they have the
>>> message bundles, etc.).
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The resource are already in the jars, so we don't need to add them in
>> this step. Just the source files need to be added.
>>
> oops - I didn't look closely at the -u flag. I thought you were
> re-building & replacing the jars.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
I did some tests on linux and after adding
#!/bin/sh
to the first line, all seems to be fine.
-- Michael
Re: Source in the binary release
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Adam Lally wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> Also - the resources need to be included in the jars (they have the
>> message bundles, etc.).
>>
>>
>
> The resource are already in the jars, so we don't need to add them in
> this step. Just the source files need to be added.
>
oops - I didn't look closely at the -u flag. I thought you were
re-building & replacing the jars.
-Marshall