You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> on 2012/11/07 20:24:37 UTC
Updated CNet Editors' Review: AOO 3.4.1: "Spectacular", 5 stars
Just noticing now, but CNet added a review of Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
back on October 16th:
http://download.cnet.com/OpenOffice-org/3000-18483_4-10263109.html?tag=mncol;1
Overall it is a good review. Main criticism is that we don't have an
integrated email client.
I'll add some quotes to our reviews page:
http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html
Have we had any other reviews we should add to that page as well?
-Rob
Re: Updated CNet Editors' Review: AOO 3.4.1: "Spectacular", 5 stars
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Indeed.
> Louis
I notice the branding is a little off, calling it "Apache
OpenOffice.org". Do you have any contacts at CNet? It would be good
to give them a gentle nudge.
-Rob
> On 12-11-07, at 14:29 , Donald Harbison <dp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Great catch. Thx.
>>
>> On Wednesday, November 7, 2012, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> Just noticing now, but CNet added a review of Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
>>> back on October 16th:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://download.cnet.com/OpenOffice-org/3000-18483_4-10263109.html?tag=mncol;1
>>>
>>> Overall it is a good review. Main criticism is that we don't have an
>>> integrated email client.
>>>
>>> I'll add some quotes to our reviews page:
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html
>>>
>>> Have we had any other reviews we should add to that page as well?
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>
Re: Updated CNet Editors' Review: AOO 3.4.1: "Spectacular", 5 stars
Posted by Louis Suárez-Potts <lu...@gmail.com>.
Indeed.
Louis
On 12-11-07, at 14:29 , Donald Harbison <dp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great catch. Thx.
>
> On Wednesday, November 7, 2012, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> Just noticing now, but CNet added a review of Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
>> back on October 16th:
>>
>>
>> http://download.cnet.com/OpenOffice-org/3000-18483_4-10263109.html?tag=mncol;1
>>
>> Overall it is a good review. Main criticism is that we don't have an
>> integrated email client.
>>
>> I'll add some quotes to our reviews page:
>> http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html
>>
>> Have we had any other reviews we should add to that page as well?
>>
>> -Rob
>>
Re: Updated CNet Editors' Review: AOO 3.4.1: "Spectacular", 5 stars
Posted by Donald Harbison <dp...@gmail.com>.
Great catch. Thx.
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012, Rob Weir wrote:
> Just noticing now, but CNet added a review of Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
> back on October 16th:
>
>
> http://download.cnet.com/OpenOffice-org/3000-18483_4-10263109.html?tag=mncol;1
>
> Overall it is a good review. Main criticism is that we don't have an
> integrated email client.
>
> I'll add some quotes to our reviews page:
> http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html
>
> Have we had any other reviews we should add to that page as well?
>
> -Rob
>
Re: Updated CNet Editors' Review: AOO 3.4.1: "Spectacular", 5 stars
Posted by Greg Madden <go...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just noticing now, but CNet added a review of Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
> back on October 16th:
>
> http://download.cnet.com/OpenOffice-org/3000-18483_4-10263109.html?tag=mncol;1
>
> Overall it is a good review. Main criticism is that we don't have an
> integrated email client.
>
> I'll add some quotes to our reviews page:
> http://www.openoffice.org/product/reviews.html
>
> Have we had any other reviews we should add to that page as well?
>
> -Rob
CNET does call ODF an OpenOffice proprietary file format :-(
They like that it is free beer, not much of an endorsement.
--
Peace
Greg Madden