You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2010/03/14 20:15:50 UTC
getting rid of the weak version number ?
Hi,
since over a year the trunk is labeled as "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT".
While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I
wonder when the trunk will
feel the same love for good version numbers?
What's the deal with continuing with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
Why not 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That's a little bit more love and it is clean.
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I know. That's totally lame and bugs me there as well.
I think goal was/is to change that soon. I *really* hope so...
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel
<ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oops, pressed "send" too fast.
>
> @Matzew: We do the same thing at MyFaces. Maybe suggest the same thing
> there?
>
> /JK
>
> 2010/3/14 Jan-Kees van Andel <ja...@gmail.com>
>
>> +1, plan sounds lovely. ;-)
>>
>> /JK
>>
>>
>> 2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> since over a year the trunk is labeled as "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT".
>>> While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I
>>> wonder when the trunk will
>>> feel the same love for good version numbers?
>>>
>>> What's the deal with continuing with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>>> Why not 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That's a little bit more love and it is clean.
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?
Posted by Jan-Kees van Andel <ja...@gmail.com>.
Oops, pressed "send" too fast.
@Matzew: We do the same thing at MyFaces. Maybe suggest the same thing
there?
/JK
2010/3/14 Jan-Kees van Andel <ja...@gmail.com>
> +1, plan sounds lovely. ;-)
>
> /JK
>
>
> 2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>
> Hi,
>>
>> since over a year the trunk is labeled as "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT".
>> While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I
>> wonder when the trunk will
>> feel the same love for good version numbers?
>>
>> What's the deal with continuing with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> Why not 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That's a little bit more love and it is clean.
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?
Posted by Jan-Kees van Andel <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1, plan sounds lovely. ;-)
/JK
2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> Hi,
>
> since over a year the trunk is labeled as "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT".
> While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I
> wonder when the trunk will
> feel the same love for good version numbers?
>
> What's the deal with continuing with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> Why not 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That's a little bit more love and it is clean.
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
ah, now it all suddenly makes sense ;-)
Thanks for explaining!
-Matthias
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
<cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There will no M5, next version is 1.0.0
>
> 2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> since over a year the trunk is labeled as "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT".
>> While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I
>> wonder when the trunk will
>> feel the same love for good version numbers?
>>
>> What's the deal with continuing with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> Why not 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That's a little bit more love and it is clean.
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>.
There will no M5, next version is 1.0.0
2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> Hi,
>
> since over a year the trunk is labeled as "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT".
> While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I
> wonder when the trunk will
> feel the same love for good version numbers?
>
> What's the deal with continuing with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> Why not 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That's a little bit more love and it is clean.
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com