You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Varun Saxena (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/12/09 20:51:13 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (YARN-2936) YARNDelegationTokenIdentifier doesn't set proto.builder now

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Varun Saxena reassigned YARN-2936:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Varun Saxena

> YARNDelegationTokenIdentifier doesn't set proto.builder now
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2936
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>            Assignee: Varun Saxena
>
> After YARN-2743, the setters are removed from YARNDelegationTokenIdentifier, such that when constructing a object which extends YARNDelegationTokenIdentifier, proto.builder is not set at all. Later on, when we call getProto() of it, we will just get an empty proto object.
> It seems to do no harm to the production code path, as we will always call getBytes() before using proto to persist the DT in the state store, when we generating the password.
> I think the setter is removed to avoid duplicating setting the fields why getBytes() is called. However, YARNDelegationTokenIdentifier doesn't work properly alone. YARNDelegationTokenIdentifier is tightly coupled with the logic in secretManager. It's vulnerable if something is changed at secretManager. For example, in the test case of YARN-2837, I spent time to figure out we need to execute getBytes() first to make sure the testing DTs can be properly put into the state store.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)