You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@whirr.apache.org by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> on 2011/12/09 00:24:38 UTC
One more step
FYI I have created patches for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447
And here is the updated test matrix:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE
We are getting to close to cutting the branch.
-- Andrei Savu
Re: One more step
Posted by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>.
Committed all remaining changes. I am now cutting the branch and start the
vote.
-- Andrei Savu
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok. I will cut the branch tonight. In the meantime can someone review 437,
> 447, 384? David? Karel? Adrian? Tibor?
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for cutting the release branch and committing blockers there, as Tom
>> said.
>>
>> -A
>> On Dec 9, 2011 10:05 PM, "Tom White" <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for cutting the branch. Blocker issues can still be committed to it
>> > after it has been cut.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Tom
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > I think we should cut the branch for 0.7.0 as soon as we commit: 437,
>> > 447,
>> > > 384.
>> > >
>> > > We can document in the release notes that we had some issues running
>> > HBase
>> > > & Hama
>> > > on cloudservers, issues that we are going to address in 0.8.0.
>> > >
>> > > This should also allow us to commit some new patches without breaking
>> the
>> > > release (e.g. OSGi support) and delaying things even more.
>> > >
>> > > What do you think? I can start the vote tonight if we make a decision.
>> > >
>> > > -- Andrei Savu
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> FYI I have created patches for:
>> > >>
>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437
>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447
>> > >>
>> > >> And here is the updated test matrix:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE
>> > >>
>> > >> We are getting to close to cutting the branch.
>> > >>
>> > >> -- Andrei Savu
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: One more step
Posted by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>.
Ok. I will cut the branch tonight. In the meantime can someone review 437,
447, 384? David? Karel? Adrian? Tibor?
-- Andrei Savu
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for cutting the release branch and committing blockers there, as Tom
> said.
>
> -A
> On Dec 9, 2011 10:05 PM, "Tom White" <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for cutting the branch. Blocker issues can still be committed to it
> > after it has been cut.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I think we should cut the branch for 0.7.0 as soon as we commit: 437,
> > 447,
> > > 384.
> > >
> > > We can document in the release notes that we had some issues running
> > HBase
> > > & Hama
> > > on cloudservers, issues that we are going to address in 0.8.0.
> > >
> > > This should also allow us to commit some new patches without breaking
> the
> > > release (e.g. OSGi support) and delaying things even more.
> > >
> > > What do you think? I can start the vote tonight if we make a decision.
> > >
> > > -- Andrei Savu
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> FYI I have created patches for:
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447
> > >>
> > >> And here is the updated test matrix:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE
> > >>
> > >> We are getting to close to cutting the branch.
> > >>
> > >> -- Andrei Savu
> > >>
> >
>
Re: One more step
Posted by Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com>.
+1 for cutting the release branch and committing blockers there, as Tom
said.
-A
On Dec 9, 2011 10:05 PM, "Tom White" <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 for cutting the branch. Blocker issues can still be committed to it
> after it has been cut.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we should cut the branch for 0.7.0 as soon as we commit: 437,
> 447,
> > 384.
> >
> > We can document in the release notes that we had some issues running
> HBase
> > & Hama
> > on cloudservers, issues that we are going to address in 0.8.0.
> >
> > This should also allow us to commit some new patches without breaking the
> > release (e.g. OSGi support) and delaying things even more.
> >
> > What do you think? I can start the vote tonight if we make a decision.
> >
> > -- Andrei Savu
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> FYI I have created patches for:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447
> >>
> >> And here is the updated test matrix:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE
> >>
> >> We are getting to close to cutting the branch.
> >>
> >> -- Andrei Savu
> >>
>
Re: One more step
Posted by Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>.
+1 for cutting the branch. Blocker issues can still be committed to it
after it has been cut.
Thanks,
Tom
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should cut the branch for 0.7.0 as soon as we commit: 437, 447,
> 384.
>
> We can document in the release notes that we had some issues running HBase
> & Hama
> on cloudservers, issues that we are going to address in 0.8.0.
>
> This should also allow us to commit some new patches without breaking the
> release (e.g. OSGi support) and delaying things even more.
>
> What do you think? I can start the vote tonight if we make a decision.
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI I have created patches for:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447
>>
>> And here is the updated test matrix:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE
>>
>> We are getting to close to cutting the branch.
>>
>> -- Andrei Savu
>>
Re: One more step
Posted by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>.
I think we should cut the branch for 0.7.0 as soon as we commit: 437, 447,
384.
We can document in the release notes that we had some issues running HBase
& Hama
on cloudservers, issues that we are going to address in 0.8.0.
This should also allow us to commit some new patches without breaking the
release (e.g. OSGi support) and delaying things even more.
What do you think? I can start the vote tonight if we make a decision.
-- Andrei Savu
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI I have created patches for:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447
>
> And here is the updated test matrix:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE
>
> We are getting to close to cutting the branch.
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>