status of httpd-2.0

[Zisis Lianas <Zi...@consol.de>]

Just for interest:
was is the current status of httpd-2.0?
Will 2.0.65 be released (soon)?
When is it planned to mark httpd-2.0 as EOL?

Re: status of httpd-2.0

[Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk>]

On 04/04/2013 01:57 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Zisis Lianas <Zisis.Lianas@consol.de
> <ma...@consol.de>> wrote:
> 
>     Just for interest:
>     was is the current status of httpd-2.0?
>     Will 2.0.65 be released (soon)?
>     When is it planned to mark httpd-2.0 as EOL?
> 
> 
> IIRC we hoped to release 2.0.65 last Fall along with a statement that
> 2.0.65 was the last release ever, except possibly to fix any regressions
> inadvertently introduced in 2.0.65.  But people are busy and you can
> judge empirically how interesting 2.0.x is to httpd developers.
> 
> I'm willing to help a bit with 2.0.65 as long as we're not in a huge hurry.
> 
Pinging this issue.

There have been some backports to 2.0 lately - can we get a 2.0.65 going
at some point and then declare EOL soon? It's been more than a year
since 2.4 came out. Can people please look at STATUS and see if they can
cast a vote or two on the remaining items?

With regards,
Daniel.

Re: status of httpd-2.0

[Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Zisis Lianas <Zi...@consol.de> wrote:

> Just for interest:
> was is the current status of httpd-2.0?
> Will 2.0.65 be released (soon)?
> When is it planned to mark httpd-2.0 as EOL?
>

IIRC we hoped to release 2.0.65 last Fall along with a statement that
2.0.65 was the last release ever, except possibly to fix any regressions
inadvertently introduced in 2.0.65.  But people are busy and you can judge
empirically how interesting 2.0.x is to httpd developers.

I'm willing to help a bit with 2.0.65 as long as we're not in a huge hurry.