ClickIDE release

[Bob Schellink <sa...@gmail.com>]

We also need to look at releasing ClickIDE. I assume we go through the 
same procedure for releasing a subproject?

bob


Malcolm Edgar wrote:
> Yes an RC would probably be good, with a code feature freeze after
> that. So it 2.1.0 doesn't drag out.
> 
> regards Malcolm
> 
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Bob Schellink <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Agreed, lets get 2.1.0 out. Probably a RC?
>>
>> On 5/18/09, Malcolm Edgar <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Click didn't progress through to a TLP yet as feedback from the Apache
>>> was that the community needed to be bigger. So we will try again in a
>>> few months time.
>>>
>>> In the mean time we need to increase the visibility of the framework.
>>> I think a good way of doing this is through a release, and promotion
>>> and some articles.
>>>
>>> If we don't time box the 2.1.0 release date, it can drag on forever.
>>>
>>> regards Malcolm Edgar
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Adrian A. <a....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> What do people think about targeting the end of May as the release
>>>>> date for Apache Click 2.1.0 ?
>>>> I would rather see the many issues standing out to be solved first, and
>>>> only
>>>> after to do a release (otherwise the difference between patches and trunk
>>>> will be bigger and bigger each day).
>>>>
>>>> Also, since the voting of moving click to TLP was done, it would be much
>>>> nicer if Click 2.1.0 would be released that way (without the incubator
>>>> tag).
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://incubator.apache.org/click/
>>
> 

Re: ClickIDE release

[Bob Schellink <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Naoki,

Yes that document outlines my current understanding of Apache releases.

I think we should push out ClickIDE after Click 2.1.0.

In the meantime you could setup your OpenGPG public/private key as 
outlined here[1].

Feel free to contact me offline if you have any questions regarding 
these steps.

kind regards

bob

[1]: 
http://incubator.apache.org/click/docs/developer-guide/releasing.html#prerequisites

Naoki Takezoe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ClickIDE (supports Apache Click 2.1.0) release is ready.
> 
> But I don't understand a release process completely...
> Should I release ClickIDE according to the following documents?
> http://incubator.apache.org/click/docs/developer-guide/releasing-subprojects.html
> 

Re: ClickIDE release

[Naoki Takezoe <ta...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

ClickIDE (supports Apache Click 2.1.0) release is ready.

But I don't understand a release process completely...
Should I release ClickIDE according to the following documents?
http://incubator.apache.org/click/docs/developer-guide/releasing-subprojects.html

2009/5/19 Bob Schellink <sa...@gmail.com>:
> We also need to look at releasing ClickIDE. I assume we go through the same
> procedure for releasing a subproject?
>
> bob
>
>
> Malcolm Edgar wrote:
>>
>> Yes an RC would probably be good, with a code feature freeze after
>> that. So it 2.1.0 doesn't drag out.
>>
>> regards Malcolm
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Bob Schellink <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Agreed, lets get 2.1.0 out. Probably a RC?
>>>
>>> On 5/18/09, Malcolm Edgar <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Click didn't progress through to a TLP yet as feedback from the Apache
>>>> was that the community needed to be bigger. So we will try again in a
>>>> few months time.
>>>>
>>>> In the mean time we need to increase the visibility of the framework.
>>>> I think a good way of doing this is through a release, and promotion
>>>> and some articles.
>>>>
>>>> If we don't time box the 2.1.0 release date, it can drag on forever.
>>>>
>>>> regards Malcolm Edgar
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Adrian A. <a....@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do people think about targeting the end of May as the release
>>>>>> date for Apache Click 2.1.0 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I would rather see the many issues standing out to be solved first, and
>>>>> only
>>>>> after to do a release (otherwise the difference between patches and
>>>>> trunk
>>>>> will be bigger and bigger each day).
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, since the voting of moving click to TLP was done, it would be
>>>>> much
>>>>> nicer if Click 2.1.0 would be released that way (without the incubator
>>>>> tag).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/click/
>>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Naoki Takezoe