You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org> on 2008/07/08 10:29:30 UTC
[VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Hi Everyone,
Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
and signatures can be downloaded at:
http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug fixes
are included. You can view the release notes here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
or
http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
While the site is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/
Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
Deng
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
I think we do if we're going to redo the release :)
-Deng
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM, James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>
wrote:
> Yep. Lets redo it.
>
> Will we need to hold a vote again?
>
> James
>
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:12 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I'm considering re-doing the 1.1 release candidate because of issue #2
> from
> > the findings here:
> >
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Archiva-1.1-standalone-version-quick-installation-remarks-td18342570.html
> >
> > (Sorry, the problem was my fault..)
> >
> > Anyway, what does everyone else think about re-doing the 1.1 rc?
> > After thinking about this, I'm in favor of re-doing it..
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Deng
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources,
> checksums
> > > and signatures can be downloaded at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> > >
> > > This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> > > artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> > > The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> > > fixes are included. You can view the release notes here:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> > > or
> > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >
> > >
> > > While the site is staged here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > >
> > >
> > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > > [ ] 0
> > > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Deng
> > >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
Yep. Lets redo it.
Will we need to hold a vote again?
James
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:12 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm considering re-doing the 1.1 release candidate because of issue #2 from
> the findings here:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Archiva-1.1-standalone-version-quick-installation-remarks-td18342570.html
>
> (Sorry, the problem was my fault..)
>
> Anyway, what does everyone else think about re-doing the 1.1 rc?
> After thinking about this, I'm in favor of re-doing it..
>
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
> > and signatures can be downloaded at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> >
> > This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> > artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> > The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> > fixes are included. You can view the release notes here:
> >
> >
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> > or
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> >
> > While the site is staged here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >
> >
> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > [ ] 0
> > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Deng
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Hi Everyone,
I'm considering re-doing the 1.1 release candidate because of issue #2 from
the findings here:
http://www.nabble.com/Archiva-1.1-standalone-version-quick-installation-remarks-td18342570.html
(Sorry, the problem was my fault..)
Anyway, what does everyone else think about re-doing the 1.1 rc?
After thinking about this, I'm in favor of re-doing it..
Thanks,
Deng
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
> and signatures can be downloaded at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
>
> This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> fixes are included. You can view the release notes here:
>
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> or
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
>
> While the site is staged here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
I volunteered to document that discussion but haven't found the time yet..
Anyway, just to finalize this release.. the problematic 1.1 rc won't be
released because of the blocker issues
found. 1.1 will be unreleased in jira and the issues under 1.1.1 will be
moved to 1.1 and the first 1.1 tag will be
renamed to its revision number.
Thanks,
Deng
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the link, I had forgotten. Did that get turned into a
> development process doc somewhere, so we can stop having this
> discussion? :)
>
> Okay, then let's get the "new" 1.1 out there soon.
>
> (Can we re-name the first 1.1 tag to 1.1-r12345 or something to remind
> us that there were two of them?)
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to follow
> > that style, not the httpd one. [1]
> >
> > Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we
> ended
> > up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to reconsider in
> > light of that, and the issue with the release?
> >
> > I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing I'm
> not
> > in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the current 1.1
> build
> > since it would cause too much confusion.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Brett
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the link, I had forgotten. Did that get turned into a
development process doc somewhere, so we can stop having this
discussion? :)
Okay, then let's get the "new" 1.1 out there soon.
(Can we re-name the first 1.1 tag to 1.1-r12345 or something to remind
us that there were two of them?)
--
Wendy
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to follow
> that style, not the httpd one. [1]
>
> Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we ended
> up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to reconsider in
> light of that, and the issue with the release?
>
> I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing I'm not
> in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the current 1.1 build
> since it would cause too much confusion.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
Thus, we unrelease the 1.1 in Jira, we move 1.1.1 in it and we relaunch the
1.1 release when we are ready ?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to follow
> that style, not the httpd one. [1]
>
> Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we ended
> up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to reconsider in
> light of that, and the issue with the release?
>
> I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing I'm not
> in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the current 1.1 build
> since it would cause too much confusion.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z
>
>
> On 11/07/2008, at 6:24 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>
> I'm also against the idea to have a 1.1.1 without 1.1. It was the coice we
>> made for the release process (eclipse like vs httpd like)
>> The only blocker thing I see with the actual 1.1 is the problem to merge
>> metadata.
>> I didn't check if it is fixed but if this was done I'm in favor to include
>> it in 1.1
>> If we don't know when we'll be able to fix it, we continue the release and
>> we document the issue.
>>
>> Arnaud
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <
>> emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1?
>>> I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before.
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote, not
>>>> publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for 1.1.1.
>>>> And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it (as
>>>> suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Wendy
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the
>>>>>
>>>> IRC
>>>
>>>> earlier today:
>>>>> 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
>>>>> 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware
>>>>>
>>>> of
>>>>
>>>>> it
>>>>> 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are:
>>>>> - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError on
>>>>> DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
>>>>> - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by
>>>>>
>>>> default
>>>
>>>> in
>>>>
>>>>> jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not
>>>>>
>>>> aware
>>>
>>>> of
>>>>
>>>>> these properties
>>>>> - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by jo...@att.blackberry.net.
/me tosses some coke onto the campfire...
(disclaimer: I have not yet read the linked discussions on release process)
If we had a more Eclipse-like nightlies, we could vote on/bless a specific nightly and then cause a release on that specific build.
Course this is very RC-like, so it'll likely get poo-poo'd by others here. ;-)
-Joakim
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:59:00
To: <de...@archiva.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to
follow that style, not the httpd one. [1]
Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we
ended up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to
reconsider in light of that, and the issue with the release?
I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing
I'm not in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the
current 1.1 build since it would cause too much confusion.
Cheers,
Brett
[1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z
On 11/07/2008, at 6:24 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> I'm also against the idea to have a 1.1.1 without 1.1. It was the
> coice we
> made for the release process (eclipse like vs httpd like)
> The only blocker thing I see with the actual 1.1 is the problem to
> merge
> metadata.
> I didn't check if it is fixed but if this was done I'm in favor to
> include
> it in 1.1
> If we don't know when we'll be able to fix it, we continue the
> release and
> we document the issue.
>
> Arnaud
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <
> emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1?
>> I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote,
>>> not
>>> publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon.
>>>
>>> I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for
>>> 1.1.1.
>>> And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it
>>> (as
>>> suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching
>>> <oc...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in
>>>> the
>> IRC
>>>> earlier today:
>>>> 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
>>>> 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are
>>>> aware
>>> of
>>>> it
>>>> 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which
>>>> are:
>>>> - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action =>
>>>> AbstractMethodError on
>>>> DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
>>>> - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by
>> default
>>> in
>>>> jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not
>> aware
>>> of
>>>> these properties
>>>> - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
>>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to
follow that style, not the httpd one. [1]
Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we
ended up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to
reconsider in light of that, and the issue with the release?
I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing
I'm not in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the
current 1.1 build since it would cause too much confusion.
Cheers,
Brett
[1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z
On 11/07/2008, at 6:24 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> I'm also against the idea to have a 1.1.1 without 1.1. It was the
> coice we
> made for the release process (eclipse like vs httpd like)
> The only blocker thing I see with the actual 1.1 is the problem to
> merge
> metadata.
> I didn't check if it is fixed but if this was done I'm in favor to
> include
> it in 1.1
> If we don't know when we'll be able to fix it, we continue the
> release and
> we document the issue.
>
> Arnaud
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <
> emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1?
>> I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote,
>>> not
>>> publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon.
>>>
>>> I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for
>>> 1.1.1.
>>> And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it
>>> (as
>>> suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching
>>> <oc...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in
>>>> the
>> IRC
>>>> earlier today:
>>>> 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
>>>> 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are
>>>> aware
>>> of
>>>> it
>>>> 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which
>>>> are:
>>>> - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action =>
>>>> AbstractMethodError on
>>>> DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
>>>> - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by
>> default
>>> in
>>>> jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not
>> aware
>>> of
>>>> these properties
>>>> - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
>>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
I'm also against the idea to have a 1.1.1 without 1.1. It was the coice we
made for the release process (eclipse like vs httpd like)
The only blocker thing I see with the actual 1.1 is the problem to merge
metadata.
I didn't check if it is fixed but if this was done I'm in favor to include
it in 1.1
If we don't know when we'll be able to fix it, we continue the release and
we document the issue.
Arnaud
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <
emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1?
> I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote, not
> > publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon.
> >
> > I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for 1.1.1.
> > And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it (as
> > suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me.
> >
> > --
> > Wendy
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the
> IRC
> > > earlier today:
> > > 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
> > > 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware
> > of
> > > it
> > > 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are:
> > > - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError on
> > > DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
> > > - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by
> default
> > in
> > > jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not
> aware
> > of
> > > these properties
> > > - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1?
I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before.
Emmanuel
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote, not
> publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon.
>
> I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for 1.1.1.
> And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it (as
> suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me.
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the IRC
> > earlier today:
> > 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
> > 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware
> of
> > it
> > 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are:
> > - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError on
> > DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
> > - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by default
> in
> > jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not aware
> of
> > these properties
> > - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote, not
publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon.
I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for 1.1.1.
And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it (as
suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me.
--
Wendy
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the IRC
> earlier today:
> 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
> 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware of
> it
> 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are:
> - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError on
> DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
> - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by default in
> jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not aware of
> these properties
> - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Hi Everyone,
Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the IRC
earlier today:
1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware of
it
3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are:
- [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError on
DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
- [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by default in
jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not aware of
these properties
- [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
Thanks,
Deng
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
> and signatures can be downloaded at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
>
> This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> fixes are included. You can view the release notes here:
>
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> or
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
>
> While the site is staged here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
+1
Emmanuel
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:31 AM, James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>
wrote:
> +1 Oh yeah!
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 16:29 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
> > and signatures can be downloaded at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> >
> > This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> > artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> > The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> fixes
> > are included. You can view the release notes here:
> >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> > or
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> >
> > While the site is staged here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >
> >
> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > [ ] 0
> > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Deng
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
+1 Oh yeah!
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 16:29 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
> and signatures can be downloaded at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
>
> This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug fixes
> are included. You can view the release notes here:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> or
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>
> While the site is staged here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/
>
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org> wrote:
> I ran through the binaries and here are some of my findings:
> 1. the source bundle builds successfully
> 2. in the repo groups page, the line in the footer seems to be broken
> 3. upload form is working nicely (tested with released & snapshot
> artifacts)
:D
>
> 4. no problems with proxying and virtual repos
>
> #2 isn't a blocker so here's my +1 :)
>
> -Deng
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, John Tolentino <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > tested it. works out of the box.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fabrice Bellingard <bellingard@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it
> works
> > > fine, so definitely +1 !!
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > - Fabrice
> > > bellingard@apache.org
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources,
> > checksums
> > > > and signatures can be downloaded at:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> > > >
> > > > This release consists of new features such as web UI form for
> uploading
> > > > artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> > > > The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of
> bug
> > > > fixes
> > > > are included. You can view the release notes here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> > > > or
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >
> > <
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> > >
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While the site is staged here:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > > > [ ] 0
> > > > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Deng
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
Rocking! Thanks Nicolas :)
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 14:07 +0200, nicolas de loof wrote:
> MRM-869 created. I'll try to find time to investigate on this one
>
> 2008/7/8 James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>:
>
> > Could you file an issue for that one Nicolas ?
> >
> > Cheers
> > James
> >
> >
> >
> > On 08/07/2008, at 8:35 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> >
> > Great work done guys, sorry not to have much time to help :-/
> >>
> >> I've updated my archiva corporate instance and it works fine, so here is
> >> my
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> I just noticed I get many empty folder created in my managed repo, due to
> >> repository group :
> >>
> >> my conf is :
> >> (group) "maven" =
> >> |__ (managed) "releases"
> >> | |_ proxy connector to central, jboss ...
> >> |__ (managed) "internal"
> >> |_ proxy to some private repositories
> >>
> >> Both my "releases" and "internal" managed repos get the same directory
> >> structure created bu archiva on artifact requests. This is not a blocker,
> >> but the "internal" one will get many useless empty folders.
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicolas.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2008/7/8 Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> I ran through the binaries and here are some of my findings:
> >>> 1. the source bundle builds successfully
> >>> 2. in the repo groups page, the line in the footer seems to be broken
> >>> 3. upload form is working nicely (tested with released & snapshot
> >>> artifacts)
> >>> 4. no problems with proxying and virtual repos
> >>>
> >>> #2 isn't a blocker so here's my +1 :)
> >>>
> >>> -Deng
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, John Tolentino <john.tolentino@gmail.com
> >>> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> tested it. works out of the box.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fabrice Bellingard <
> >>>> bellingard@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it
> >>>>>
> >>>> works
> >>>
> >>>> fine, so definitely +1 !!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Fabrice
> >>>>> bellingard@apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> checksums
> >>>>
> >>>>> and signatures can be downloaded at:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This release consists of new features such as web UI form for
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> uploading
> >>>
> >>>> artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> >>>>>> The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> bug
> >>>
> >>>> fixes
> >>>>>> are included. You can view the release notes here:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> >>>
> >>>> or
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> >>> <
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >>> >
> >>> <
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While the site is staged here:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >>>
> >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >>>>
> >>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it!
> >>>>>> [ ] 0
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Deng
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org>.
MRM-869 created. I'll try to find time to investigate on this one
2008/7/8 James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>:
> Could you file an issue for that one Nicolas ?
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>
>
> On 08/07/2008, at 8:35 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>
> Great work done guys, sorry not to have much time to help :-/
>>
>> I've updated my archiva corporate instance and it works fine, so here is
>> my
>> +1
>>
>>
>> I just noticed I get many empty folder created in my managed repo, due to
>> repository group :
>>
>> my conf is :
>> (group) "maven" =
>> |__ (managed) "releases"
>> | |_ proxy connector to central, jboss ...
>> |__ (managed) "internal"
>> |_ proxy to some private repositories
>>
>> Both my "releases" and "internal" managed repos get the same directory
>> structure created bu archiva on artifact requests. This is not a blocker,
>> but the "internal" one will get many useless empty folders.
>>
>>
>> Nicolas.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/7/8 Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>:
>>
>> I ran through the binaries and here are some of my findings:
>>> 1. the source bundle builds successfully
>>> 2. in the repo groups page, the line in the footer seems to be broken
>>> 3. upload form is working nicely (tested with released & snapshot
>>> artifacts)
>>> 4. no problems with proxying and virtual repos
>>>
>>> #2 isn't a blocker so here's my +1 :)
>>>
>>> -Deng
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, John Tolentino <john.tolentino@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> tested it. works out of the box.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fabrice Bellingard <
>>>> bellingard@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it
>>>>>
>>>> works
>>>
>>>> fine, so definitely +1 !!
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> - Fabrice
>>>>> bellingard@apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources,
>>>>>>
>>>>> checksums
>>>>
>>>>> and signatures can be downloaded at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This release consists of new features such as web UI form for
>>>>>>
>>>>> uploading
>>>
>>>> artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
>>>>>> The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of
>>>>>>
>>>>> bug
>>>
>>>> fixes
>>>>>> are included. You can view the release notes here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
>>>
>>>> or
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
>>> <
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>>> >
>>> <
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>>>
>>>>
>>>> <
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> <
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While the site is staged here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>>>>>
>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>>
>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>>>
>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it!
>>>>>> [ ] 0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Deng
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
Could you file an issue for that one Nicolas ?
Cheers
James
On 08/07/2008, at 8:35 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> Great work done guys, sorry not to have much time to help :-/
>
> I've updated my archiva corporate instance and it works fine, so
> here is my
> +1
>
>
> I just noticed I get many empty folder created in my managed repo,
> due to
> repository group :
>
> my conf is :
> (group) "maven" =
> |__ (managed) "releases"
> | |_ proxy connector to central, jboss ...
> |__ (managed) "internal"
> |_ proxy to some private repositories
>
> Both my "releases" and "internal" managed repos get the same directory
> structure created bu archiva on artifact requests. This is not a
> blocker,
> but the "internal" one will get many useless empty folders.
>
>
> Nicolas.
>
>
>
>
> 2008/7/8 Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>:
>
>> I ran through the binaries and here are some of my findings:
>> 1. the source bundle builds successfully
>> 2. in the repo groups page, the line in the footer seems to be broken
>> 3. upload form is working nicely (tested with released & snapshot
>> artifacts)
>> 4. no problems with proxying and virtual repos
>>
>> #2 isn't a blocker so here's my +1 :)
>>
>> -Deng
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, John Tolentino <john.tolentino@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> tested it. works out of the box.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fabrice Bellingard <bellingard@gmail.com
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it
>> works
>>>> fine, so definitely +1 !!
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> - Fabrice
>>>> bellingard@apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@apache.org
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources,
>>> checksums
>>>>> and signatures can be downloaded at:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
>>>>>
>>>>> This release consists of new features such as web UI form for
>> uploading
>>>>> artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
>>>>> The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of
>> bug
>>>>> fixes
>>>>> are included. You can view the release notes here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
>>>>> or
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>> >
>> <
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>>>
>>> <
>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>>>>
>>>> <
>>>>
>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> While the site is staged here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/
>>>>> >
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it!
>>>>> [ ] 0
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Deng
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org>.
Great work done guys, sorry not to have much time to help :-/
I've updated my archiva corporate instance and it works fine, so here is my
+1
I just noticed I get many empty folder created in my managed repo, due to
repository group :
my conf is :
(group) "maven" =
|__ (managed) "releases"
| |_ proxy connector to central, jboss ...
|__ (managed) "internal"
|_ proxy to some private repositories
Both my "releases" and "internal" managed repos get the same directory
structure created bu archiva on artifact requests. This is not a blocker,
but the "internal" one will get many useless empty folders.
Nicolas.
2008/7/8 Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>:
> I ran through the binaries and here are some of my findings:
> 1. the source bundle builds successfully
> 2. in the repo groups page, the line in the footer seems to be broken
> 3. upload form is working nicely (tested with released & snapshot
> artifacts)
> 4. no problems with proxying and virtual repos
>
> #2 isn't a blocker so here's my +1 :)
>
> -Deng
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, John Tolentino <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > tested it. works out of the box.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fabrice Bellingard <bellingard@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it
> works
> > > fine, so definitely +1 !!
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > - Fabrice
> > > bellingard@apache.org
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources,
> > checksums
> > > > and signatures can be downloaded at:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> > > >
> > > > This release consists of new features such as web UI form for
> uploading
> > > > artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> > > > The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of
> bug
> > > > fixes
> > > > are included. You can view the release notes here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> > > > or
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >
> > <
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> > >
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While the site is staged here:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > > > [ ] 0
> > > > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Deng
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
I ran through the binaries and here are some of my findings:
1. the source bundle builds successfully
2. in the repo groups page, the line in the footer seems to be broken
3. upload form is working nicely (tested with released & snapshot artifacts)
4. no problems with proxying and virtual repos
#2 isn't a blocker so here's my +1 :)
-Deng
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, John Tolentino <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> tested it. works out of the box.
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fabrice Bellingard <be...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it works
> > fine, so definitely +1 !!
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > - Fabrice
> > bellingard@apache.org
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources,
> checksums
> > > and signatures can be downloaded at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> > >
> > > This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> > > artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> > > The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> > > fixes
> > > are included. You can view the release notes here:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> > > or
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >
> > <
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> > >
> > >
> > > While the site is staged here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> > >
> > >
> > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > > [ ] 0
> > > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Deng
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by John Tolentino <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1
tested it. works out of the box.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fabrice Bellingard <be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it works
> fine, so definitely +1 !!
>
> :-)
>
> - Fabrice
> bellingard@apache.org
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
> > and signatures can be downloaded at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
> >
> > This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> > artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> > The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> > fixes
> > are included. You can view the release notes here:
> >
> >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> > or
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html
> >
> >
> > While the site is staged here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
> >
> >
> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > [ ] 0
> > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Deng
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Posted by Fabrice Bellingard <be...@gmail.com>.
I've been using 1.1-SNAPSHOT in my company for quite a while and it works
fine, so definitely +1 !!
:-)
- Fabrice
bellingard@apache.org
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Archiva 1.1 has been staged for release. The binaries, sources, checksums
> and signatures can be downloaded at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1/
>
> This release consists of new features such as web UI form for uploading
> artifacts, virtual repositories and RSS feeds.
> The webdav module has also been migrated to Jackrabbit and lots of bug
> fixes
> are included. You can view the release notes here:
>
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13861&styleName=Text&projectId=10980&Create=Create
> or
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/release-notes.html>
>
> While the site is staged here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/stage-repo/archiva-site-1.1/>
>
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback :)
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>