You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "Timo Rantalaiho (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/11/03 06:43:12 UTC

[jira] Commented: (WICKET-1108) Inherited Pages don't include components from super page.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539875 ] 

Timo Rantalaiho commented on WICKET-1108:
-----------------------------------------

For what it's worth, I always just assumed that of course
Wicket components follow the normal java way of
construction, so the normal rules of which constructor gets
called when do apply. It's a similar thing to Hibernate
following the java idiom on two-way relationships being
handled manually. 

Life is easier when we all play by the same rules, so I
think that this "bug" is actually a good feature.



> Inherited Pages don't include components from super page.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-1108
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1108
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0-beta3
>            Reporter: Brill Pappin
>            Assignee: Igor Vaynberg
>             Fix For: 1.3.0-beta5
>
>         Attachments: test-wicket-1108.zip
>
>
> I've got two pages:
> an abstract base page that has items included in all pages (BasePAge in this spike), and a concrete page (Index in this spike):
> - BasePage includes items like the title
> - Index only has content that applies to the index page.
> What I expected to happen was that the BasePage would include its components and the index page would include its one component.
> However when run, I get an error that not all the wicket tags have components.
> This was unexpected and counter intuitive to a java developer.
> Of course, being very new to Wicket, I may simply have done something wrong (which is why this is not marked as a bug).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.