Re: Release 9 tickets

[Dammina Sahabandu <dm...@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

Shall we start working on these pointers or is there anything else that is
more important for the next release? I will be able to start working on
these pointers within next few days, please join the discussion if you are
able to contribute with any of these changes. Other than these things I
guess we can include the work, that is to be reviewed by the PMC, for the
next BH release.

Thanks,
Dammina

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been looking at the tickets that are currently in release 9 and I
> want to get them completed as soon as possible to get towards a new
> release. With that in mind, I'd like to discuss a few of the tickets now to
> get some opinions.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/634 seems to really detail 4
> issues (as listed in full by #745 - I haven't checked if these are separate
> tickets anywhere yet):
>   a) the visual artefact of the comments hiding the draft view status
> dropdown when this gets wide
>   b) on submit, any warning about the submission is out of sight at the top
> of the page
>   c) you need to re-select the duplicate resolution to make the input for
> the duplicate id to appear
>   d) clicking cancel keeps the draft image in view
>
> For b) we could look at showing warnings and messages in the sticky header
> though it would be nice to be able to highlight fields that are causing
> problems.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/841 is in a similar area to
> #634 above so it might make sense for one person to look at both.
>
> I was never able to observe the behaviour described in
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/840 about milestones going
> missing. This will probably have to be resolved as worksforme unless anyone
> else has seen such issues.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/842 appears to have a fix from
> Thimal (thanks for that!) though this appears to have only made it to trac.
> While we might update our trac version, I would not be averse to committing
> a patch direct to bloodhound and revert the change if necessary later.
>
> I'll stop at that for now. Hope to hear some opinions from others on these
> or other issues.
>
> Cheers,
>     Gary
>



-- 
Dammina Sahabandu
SSE, AdroitLogic (pvt) Ltd.
Committer, Apache Software Foundation
AMIE (SL)
Bsc Eng Hons (Moratuwa)
+94716422775

Re: Release 9 tickets

[Ryan J Ollos <rj...@apache.org>]

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM Dammina Sahabandu <dm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Shall we start working on these pointers or is there anything else that is
> more important for the next release? I will be able to start working on
> these pointers within next few days, please join the discussion if you are
> able to contribute with any of these changes. Other than these things I
> guess we can include the work, that is to be reviewed by the PMC, for the
> next BH release.
>
> Thanks,
> Dammina
>

Release 9 had tickets that looked important to me when I was planning the
milestone. You should feel free to work on those if you'd like, but since
you are the key person working on Bloodhound these days, you should feel
free to set your own priorities that you think will be good for the project.

- Ryan