You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/02 08:45:02 UTC

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
doesn't contain it :(

And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?

Thanks in advance

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>
> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you also
> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>> will do migration and examine examples
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  sorry, most probably missed that email
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
>>>>> improve it tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>
>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thanks Martin :)
>>>>>> will look through sources :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
>>>>>>
>>>>> this
>>>>
>>>>> question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>
>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Everything is possible.
>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wicket7
>>>>
>>>>> examples as well?
>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>
>>>>> lots
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Component?
>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

Please see http://markmail.org/message/ji4nixgscvnbgi7z

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the clarifications Martin
> This seems to be caching issue on my side
>
> Could you please answer additional question regarding ListView
> It seems to be impossible in latest snapshot to create ListView<A>("list",
> new List<? extends A>())
> It was working as expected in M6 and previous versions ....
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > There is a new build. The snapshots should be updated.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Maxim,
> > >
> > > no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> your
> > > suggestions! :-)
> > >
> > > Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > buildbot
> > > server. However the build was triggered already.
> > >
> > > kind regards
> > >
> > > Tobias
> > >
> > > > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> seems
> > > > doesn't contain it :(
> > > >
> > > > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> PageParameters
> > > > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> > it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > >>
> > > >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > >>
> > > >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> you
> > > also
> > > >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> is
> > > >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> information
> > > >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > >>
> > > >> kind regards
> > > >>
> > > >> Tobias
> > > >>
> > > >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > >>>>> Thanks!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> > to
> > > >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> used
> > > in
> > > >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > > answer
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> this
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> question?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> lots
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed
> > from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>> WBR
> > > >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> WBR
> > > >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Thanks for the clarifications Martin
This seems to be caching issue on my side

Could you please answer additional question regarding ListView
It seems to be impossible in latest snapshot to create ListView<A>("list",
new List<? extends A>())
It was working as expected in M6 and previous versions ....

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> There is a new build. The snapshots should be updated.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> > suggestions! :-)
> >
> > Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> buildbot
> > server. However the build was triggered already.
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> > > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >:
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > > doesn't contain it :(
> > >
> > > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> it?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Maxim,
> > >>
> > >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > >>
> > >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> > also
> > >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> > >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> > >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > >>
> > >> kind regards
> > >>
> > >> Tobias
> > >>
> > >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks a lot!
> > >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax666@gmail.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > >>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> to
> > >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> > in
> > >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > answer
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> this
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> question?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> examples as well?
> > >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> found
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> lots
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed
> from
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> WBR
> > >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> WBR
> > >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

There is a new build. The snapshots should be updated.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> suggestions! :-)
>
> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
> server. However the build was triggered already.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > doesn't contain it :(
> >
> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>
> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> also
> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> in
> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> answer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> question?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> examples as well?
> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> found
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> lots
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> WBR
> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.

Hi,

just wanted to mention that there are getter / setter for the 
PageParameters, now.

kind regards

Tobias

Am 02.07.15 um 16:21 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> I also doing this regularly :)
>
> WBR, Maxim
> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> On Jul 2, 2015 8:09 PM, "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro" <re...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Doing it all the time :-)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to
>>> bring enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam.
>>>
>>> So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam
>> Mail"
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
>>> reiern70@gmail.com>:
>>>> @Tobias,
>>>>
>>>> OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span
>> account
>>>> at gmail...
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>
>>>>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
>> your
>>>>> suggestions! :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
>>> buildbot
>>>>> server. However the build was triggered already.
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>> :
>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>>>>>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>> seems
>>>>>> doesn't contain it :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
>> PageParameters
>>>>>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
>>> it?
>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>>>>>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
>> you
>>>>> also
>>>>>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
>> is
>>>>>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
>> information
>>>>>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>>>>>>>> will do migration and examine examples
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
>> used
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>> question?
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket7
>>>>>>>>>>> examples as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>> lots
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed
>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

I also doing this regularly :)

WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Jul 2, 2015 8:09 PM, "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro" <re...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Doing it all the time :-)
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to
> > bring enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam.
> >
> > So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam
> Mail"
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> > > Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reiern70@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > @Tobias,
> > >
> > > OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span
> account
> > > at gmail...
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Maxim,
> > >>
> > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> your
> > >> suggestions! :-)
> > >>
> > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > buildbot
> > >> server. However the build was triggered already.
> > >>
> > >> kind regards
> > >>
> > >> Tobias
> > >>
> > >>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > >>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> seems
> > >>> doesn't contain it :(
> > >>>
> > >>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> PageParameters
> > >>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> > it?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks in advance
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > >>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Maxim,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> you
> > >> also
> > >>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> is
> > >>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> information
> > >>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> kind regards
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Tobias
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks a lot!
> > >>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > >>>>> will do migration and examine examples
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigorov@apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > >>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> > to
> > >>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > >>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> used
> > >> in
> > >>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > >> answer
> > >>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> question?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > >>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > >>>>>>>>>> wicket7
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> examples as well?
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > >>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> found
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> lots
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed
> > from
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> WBR
> > >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> WBR
> > >>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <re...@gmail.com>.

Doing it all the time :-)

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to
> bring enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam.
>
> So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam Mail"
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reiern70@gmail.com>:
> >
> > @Tobias,
> >
> > OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span account
> > at gmail...
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> >> suggestions! :-)
> >>
> >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> buildbot
> >> server. However the build was triggered already.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> >>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> >>> doesn't contain it :(
> >>>
> >>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> >>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> it?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>
> >>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>>>
> >>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> >> also
> >>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> >>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> >>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>>>
> >>>> kind regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Tobias
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks a lot!
> >>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>>>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> to
> >>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> >>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> >> answer
> >>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> question?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> >>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >>>>>>>>>> wicket7
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> examples as well?
> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> found
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> lots
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed
> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> WBR
> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.

Hi,

I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to bring enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam. 

So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam Mail"

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <re...@gmail.com>:
> 
> @Tobias,
> 
> OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span account
> at gmail...
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Maxim,
>> 
>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
>> suggestions! :-)
>> 
>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
>> server. However the build was triggered already.
>> 
>> kind regards
>> 
>> Tobias
>> 
>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
>>> doesn't contain it :(
>>> 
>>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
>>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>> 
>>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>>>> 
>>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
>> also
>>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
>>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
>>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>>>> 
>>>> kind regards
>>>> 
>>>> Tobias
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>>>>> will do migration and examine examples
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
>>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
>>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
>> in
>>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
>> answer
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> question?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
>>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
>>>>>>>>>> wicket7
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> examples as well?
>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> lots
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <re...@gmail.com>.

@Tobias,

OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span account
at gmail...

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> suggestions! :-)
>
> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
> server. However the build was triggered already.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > doesn't contain it :(
> >
> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>
> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> also
> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> in
> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> answer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> question?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> examples as well?
> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> found
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> lots
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> WBR
> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.

I also did changes in Wicket jQuery UI, all seems to be ok too, I will test
further the coming days...

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> I have made the changes in Wicket Bootstrap and all seems to be fine!
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be
> > > > migrated :/.
> > > >
> > > > > We can try though!
> > > >
> > > > I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and
> > > > respond()-methods kept their ART.
> > > > All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a
> > > > IPartialPageRequestHandler now.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I've missed that ModalWindow#close() is changed too.
> > > I'll do a grep as well.
> > >
> > > Since this change is done for Wicket then it should be done for other
> > more
> > > important UI libraries like Wicket jQuery UI, Wicket Bootstrap and
> > > WicketStuff Foundation.
> > > I suggest to postpone the release of Wicket 7.0.0 with few weeks until
> we
> > > make the changes and test them for few days.
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> >
> > +1, would be a wise decision...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods
> in
> > > > wicket-jquery-ui.
> > > >
> > > > Sven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 09.07.2015 22:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>  Ok. you're partially right :/
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  The compilation error would happen if an application extends
> > > ModalWindow
> > > >> and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra
> > tasks. I
> > > >> have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
> > > >> applications.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>  #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type
> > has
> > > >>> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
> > > >>> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
> > > >>> recompiled anyway.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
> > > >> candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too
> late.
> > > We
> > > >> can try though!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> Sven
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Hi Martin,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>  This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the
> > type
> > > of
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> the parameter from ART
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have
> to
> > > fix
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> the compilation error.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>   If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API
> break.
> > > >>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>  Nope, see above.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards
> > > >>>> Sven
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>  Hi Sven,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>   Hi,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from
> > > AjaxRequestTarget
> > > >>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>  - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART,
> > e.g.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>  modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>   What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually
> > > >>>>>> changes
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
> > > >>>>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window)
> > > from
> > > >>>>> WebSocket response.
> > > >>>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the
> > type
> > > of
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses
> > > >>>>> ModalWindow
> > > >>>>> will have to fix the compilation error.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>   - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>       AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>   It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so
> > this
> > > is
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> OK.
> > > >>>>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something
> like
> > > this
> > > >>>>> is
> > > >>>>> needed.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>   - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
> > > >>>>>>       find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>   Those are good changes!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>   If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their
> > > >>>>> signature
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
> > > >>>>>> without breaking the API.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>  No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> > > >>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API
> break.
> > > >>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>     we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a
> > > little
> > > >>>>>> bit
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>  concerned
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>   So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step
> > further
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> instead
> > > >>>>>> of 2 steps back.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>   IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI
> (Sebastien
> > > does
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> this
> > > >>>>> from time to time).
> > > >>>>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as
> I
> > > >>>>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH
> to
> > > ART:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> MyComponent.java:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
> > > >>>>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
> > > >>>>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
> > > >>>>>       {
> > > >>>>>          AjaxRequestTarget target =
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > >
> >
> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>          modalWindow.close(target);
> > > >>>>>       }
> > > >>>>> });
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>   Regards
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Sven
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>   Hi Sven,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>    But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of
> > this
> > > >>>>>>> kind?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>     True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>  "on"-prefix).
> > > >>>>>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed
> (like
> > > >>>>>>> #open,
> > > >>>>>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls
> to
> > > >>>>>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
> > > >>>>>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to
> > > >>>>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote
> > > "worried"
> > > >>>>>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something
> here...
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks & best regards,
> > > >>>>>>> Sebastien.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

I have made the changes in Wicket Bootstrap and all seems to be fine!

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be
> > > migrated :/.
> > >
> > > > We can try though!
> > >
> > > I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and
> > > respond()-methods kept their ART.
> > > All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a
> > > IPartialPageRequestHandler now.
> > >
> >
> > I've missed that ModalWindow#close() is changed too.
> > I'll do a grep as well.
> >
> > Since this change is done for Wicket then it should be done for other
> more
> > important UI libraries like Wicket jQuery UI, Wicket Bootstrap and
> > WicketStuff Foundation.
> > I suggest to postpone the release of Wicket 7.0.0 with few weeks until we
> > make the changes and test them for few days.
> > WDYT?
> >
>
> +1, would be a wise decision...
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods in
> > > wicket-jquery-ui.
> > >
> > > Sven
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 09.07.2015 22:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  Ok. you're partially right :/
> > >>>
> > >>>  The compilation error would happen if an application extends
> > ModalWindow
> > >> and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra
> tasks. I
> > >> have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
> > >> applications.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)
> > >>>>
> > >>> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type
> has
> > >>> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
> > >>> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
> > >>> recompiled anyway.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
> > >> candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late.
> > We
> > >> can try though!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Sven
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  Hi Martin,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the
> type
> > of
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> the parameter from ART
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to
> > fix
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> the compilation error.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>   If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
> > >>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  Nope, see above.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> Sven
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  Hi Sven,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from
> > AjaxRequestTarget
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>  - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART,
> e.g.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>   What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually
> > >>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
> > >>>>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window)
> > from
> > >>>>> WebSocket response.
> > >>>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the
> type
> > of
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses
> > >>>>> ModalWindow
> > >>>>> will have to fix the compilation error.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>       AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>   It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so
> this
> > is
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> OK.
> > >>>>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like
> > this
> > >>>>> is
> > >>>>> needed.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
> > >>>>>>       find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>   Those are good changes!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their
> > >>>>> signature
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
> > >>>>>> without breaking the API.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>  No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> > >>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
> > >>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>     we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a
> > little
> > >>>>>> bit
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>  concerned
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>   So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step
> further
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> instead
> > >>>>>> of 2 steps back.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>   IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien
> > does
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> this
> > >>>>> from time to time).
> > >>>>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
> > >>>>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to
> > ART:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> MyComponent.java:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
> > >>>>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
> > >>>>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
> > >>>>>       {
> > >>>>>          AjaxRequestTarget target =
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> >
> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>          modalWindow.close(target);
> > >>>>>       }
> > >>>>> });
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   Regards
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Sven
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>   Hi Sven,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>    But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of
> this
> > >>>>>>> kind?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>     True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  "on"-prefix).
> > >>>>>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like
> > >>>>>>> #open,
> > >>>>>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
> > >>>>>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
> > >>>>>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to
> > >>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote
> > "worried"
> > >>>>>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks & best regards,
> > >>>>>>> Sebastien.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.

Hi Martin,

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>
> > Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be
> > migrated :/.
> >
> > > We can try though!
> >
> > I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and
> > respond()-methods kept their ART.
> > All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a
> > IPartialPageRequestHandler now.
> >
>
> I've missed that ModalWindow#close() is changed too.
> I'll do a grep as well.
>
> Since this change is done for Wicket then it should be done for other more
> important UI libraries like Wicket jQuery UI, Wicket Bootstrap and
> WicketStuff Foundation.
> I suggest to postpone the release of Wicket 7.0.0 with few weeks until we
> make the changes and test them for few days.
> WDYT?
>

+1, would be a wise decision...


>
>
> >
> > If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods in
> > wicket-jquery-ui.
> >
> > Sven
> >
> >
> >
> > On 09.07.2015 22:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>  Ok. you're partially right :/
> >>>
> >>>  The compilation error would happen if an application extends
> ModalWindow
> >> and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra tasks. I
> >> have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
> >> applications.
> >>
> >>
> >>  #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)
> >>>>
> >>> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has
> >>> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
> >>> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
> >>> recompiled anyway.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
> >> candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late.
> We
> >> can try though!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Sven
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Hi Martin,
> >>>>
> >>>>  This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type
> of
> >>>>>
> >>>> the parameter from ART
> >>>>
> >>>>> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to
> fix
> >>>>>
> >>>> the compilation error.
> >>>>
> >>>> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
> >>>>
> >>>>   If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> >>>>
> >>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
> >>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Nope, see above.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Sven
> >>>>
> >>>> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>  Hi Sven,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from
> AjaxRequestTarget
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually
> >>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
> >>>>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window)
> from
> >>>>> WebSocket response.
> >>>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type
> of
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses
> >>>>> ModalWindow
> >>>>> will have to fix the compilation error.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>       AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this
> is
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> OK.
> >>>>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like
> this
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
> >>>>>>       find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   Those are good changes!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their
> >>>>> signature
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
> >>>>>> without breaking the API.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> >>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
> >>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a
> little
> >>>>>> bit
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  concerned
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>   So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> instead
> >>>>>> of 2 steps back.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien
> does
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> this
> >>>>> from time to time).
> >>>>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
> >>>>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to
> ART:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> MyComponent.java:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
> >>>>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
> >>>>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
> >>>>>       {
> >>>>>          AjaxRequestTarget target =
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          modalWindow.close(target);
> >>>>>       }
> >>>>> });
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Regards
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   Hi Sven,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this
> >>>>>>> kind?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>     True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  "on"-prefix).
> >>>>>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like
> >>>>>>> #open,
> >>>>>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
> >>>>>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
> >>>>>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to
> >>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote
> "worried"
> >>>>>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks & best regards,
> >>>>>>> Sebastien.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:

> Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be
> migrated :/.
>
> > We can try though!
>
> I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and
> respond()-methods kept their ART.
> All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a
> IPartialPageRequestHandler now.
>

I've missed that ModalWindow#close() is changed too.
I'll do a grep as well.

Since this change is done for Wicket then it should be done for other more
important UI libraries like Wicket jQuery UI, Wicket Bootstrap and
WicketStuff Foundation.
I suggest to postpone the release of Wicket 7.0.0 with few weeks until we
make the changes and test them for few days.
WDYT?


>
> If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods in
> wicket-jquery-ui.
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 09.07.2015 22:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>
>>  Ok. you're partially right :/
>>>
>>>  The compilation error would happen if an application extends ModalWindow
>> and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra tasks. I
>> have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
>> applications.
>>
>>
>>  #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)
>>>>
>>> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has
>>> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
>>> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
>>> recompiled anyway.
>>>
>>
>> The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
>> candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late. We
>> can try though!
>>
>>
>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Martin,
>>>>
>>>>  This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>>>>>
>>>> the parameter from ART
>>>>
>>>>> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to fix
>>>>>
>>>> the compilation error.
>>>>
>>>> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
>>>>
>>>>   If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>>>
>>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Nope, see above.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sven
>>>>
>>>> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Sven,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>>>>>
>>>>>  modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually
>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>
>>>>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
>>>>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
>>>>> WebSocket response.
>>>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>>>>> the
>>>>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses
>>>>> ModalWindow
>>>>> will have to fix the compilation error.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
>>>>>
>>>>>>       AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is
>>>>>>
>>>>> OK.
>>>>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this
>>>>> is
>>>>> needed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
>>>>>
>>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
>>>>>>       find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Those are good changes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their
>>>>> signature
>>>>>
>>>>>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
>>>>>> without breaking the API.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little
>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  concerned
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> instead
>>>>>> of 2 steps back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does
>>>>>>
>>>>> this
>>>>> from time to time).
>>>>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
>>>>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:
>>>>>
>>>>> MyComponent.java:
>>>>>
>>>>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
>>>>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
>>>>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
>>>>>       {
>>>>>          AjaxRequestTarget target =
>>>>>
>>>>> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
>>>>>
>>>>>          modalWindow.close(target);
>>>>>       }
>>>>> });
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Regards
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Hi Sven,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this
>>>>>>> kind?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  "on"-prefix).
>>>>>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like
>>>>>>> #open,
>>>>>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
>>>>>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
>>>>>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
>>>>>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks & best regards,
>>>>>>> Sebastien.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.

Hi Sven,


On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:

> Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be
> migrated :/.
>
> > We can try though!
>
> I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and
> respond()-methods kept their ART.
> All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a
> IPartialPageRequestHandler now.
>
> If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods in
> wicket-jquery-ui.
>

Thank you very much for your offer but I will handle it :)


>
> Sven
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.

Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be 
migrated :/.

 > We can try though!

I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and 
respond()-methods kept their ART.
All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a 
IPartialPageRequestHandler now.

If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods in 
wicket-jquery-ui.

Sven


On 09.07.2015 22:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>
>> Ok. you're partially right :/
>>
> The compilation error would happen if an application extends ModalWindow
> and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra tasks. I
> have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
> applications.
>
>
>>> #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)
>> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has
>> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
>> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
>> recompiled anyway.
>
> The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
> candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late. We
> can try though!
>
>
>>
>> Sven
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>>> the parameter from ART
>>>> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to fix
>>> the compilation error.
>>>
>>> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
>>>
>>>   If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>>
>>> Nope, see above.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sven
>>>
>>> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sven,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Hi,
>>>>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget
>>>>> to
>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
>>>>>
>>>> - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>>>>
>>>>> modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>>>>>
>>>>>   What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
>>>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
>>>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
>>>> WebSocket response.
>>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>>>> the
>>>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
>>>> will have to fix the compilation error.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
>>>>>       AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>>>>>
>>>>>   It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is
>>>> OK.
>>>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this
>>>> is
>>>> needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
>>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
>>>>>       find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>>>>>
>>>>>   Those are good changes!
>>>>
>>>>   If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature
>>>>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
>>>>> without breaking the API.
>>>>>
>>>> No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>    we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little
>>>>> bit
>>>>>
>>>>>> concerned
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further
>>>>> instead
>>>>> of 2 steps back.
>>>>>
>>>>>   IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does
>>>> this
>>>> from time to time).
>>>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
>>>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:
>>>>
>>>> MyComponent.java:
>>>>
>>>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
>>>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
>>>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
>>>>       {
>>>>          AjaxRequestTarget target =
>>>> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
>>>>
>>>>          modalWindow.close(target);
>>>>       }
>>>> });
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Regards
>>>>> Sven
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi Sven,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> "on"-prefix).
>>>>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like
>>>>>> #open,
>>>>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
>>>>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
>>>>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
>>>>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
>>>>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks & best regards,
>>>>>> Sebastien.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:

> Ok. you're partially right :/
>

The compilation error would happen if an application extends ModalWindow
and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra tasks. I
have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
applications.


>
> >#close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)
>
> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has
> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
> recompiled anyway.


The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late. We
can try though!


>
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> > This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>> the parameter from ART
>> > to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to fix
>> the compilation error.
>>
>> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
>>
>>  If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, see above.
>>
>> Regards
>> Sven
>>
>> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sven,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget
>>>> to
>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
>>>>
>>> - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>>>
>>>> modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>>>>
>>>>  What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
>>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
>>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
>>> WebSocket response.
>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>>> the
>>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
>>> will have to fix the compilation error.
>>>
>>>
>>>  - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
>>>>      AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>>>>
>>>>  It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is
>>> OK.
>>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this
>>> is
>>> needed.
>>>
>>>
>>>  - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
>>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
>>>>      find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>>>>
>>>>  Those are good changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>  If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature
>>>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
>>>> without breaking the API.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>   we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little
>>>> bit
>>>>
>>>>> concerned
>>>>>
>>>>>  So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further
>>>> instead
>>>> of 2 steps back.
>>>>
>>>>  IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does
>>> this
>>> from time to time).
>>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
>>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:
>>>
>>> MyComponent.java:
>>>
>>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
>>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
>>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
>>>      {
>>>         AjaxRequestTarget target =
>>> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
>>>
>>>         modalWindow.close(target);
>>>      }
>>> });
>>>
>>>
>>>  Regards
>>>> Sven
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Sven,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>>>>>>
>>>>> "on"-prefix).
>>>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like
>>>>> #open,
>>>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
>>>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
>>>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
>>>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
>>>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & best regards,
>>>>> Sebastien.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.

Ok. you're partially right :/

 >#close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)

Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has 
changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be 
recompiled anyway.

Sven


On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type 
> of the parameter from ART
> > to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to 
> fix the compilation error.
>
> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
>
>> If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>
> Nope, see above.
>
> Regards
> Sven
>
> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from 
>>> AjaxRequestTarget to
>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>>
>>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
>> - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>>> modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>>>
>> What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
>> WebSocket response.
>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type 
>> of the
>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
>> will have to fix the compilation error.
>>
>>
>>> - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
>>>      AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>>>
>> It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is OK.
>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like 
>> this is
>> needed.
>>
>>
>>> - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
>>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
>>>      find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>>>
>> Those are good changes!
>>
>>
>>> If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their 
>>> signature
>>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
>>> without breaking the API.
>>
>> No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>   we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a 
>>> little bit
>>>> concerned
>>>>
>>> So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further 
>>> instead
>>> of 2 steps back.
>>>
>> IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does 
>> this
>> from time to time).
>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:
>>
>> MyComponent.java:
>>
>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
>>      {
>>         AjaxRequestTarget target =
>> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage()); 
>>
>>         modalWindow.close(target);
>>      }
>> });
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sven,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this 
>>>> kind?
>>>>>
>>>>>   True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>>>> "on"-prefix).
>>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like 
>>>> #open,
>>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
>>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
>>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
>>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
>>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & best regards,
>>>> Sebastien.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.

Hi Martin,

 > This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type 
of the parameter from ART
 > to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to 
fix the compilation error.

but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.

> If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>Every application will both at compile time and runtime.

Nope, see above.

Regards
Sven

On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget to
>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>
>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
> - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>>      modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>>
> What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
> WebSocket response.
> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of the
> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
> will have to fix the compilation error.
>
>
>> - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
>>      AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>>
> It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is OK.
> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this is
> needed.
>
>
>> - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
>>      find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>>
> Those are good changes!
>
>
>> If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature
>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
>> without breaking the API.
>
> No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>
>
>>
>>   we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit
>>> concerned
>>>
>> So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further instead
>> of 2 steps back.
>>
> IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does this
> from time to time).
> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:
>
> MyComponent.java:
>
> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
>      {
>         AjaxRequestTarget target =
> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
>         modalWindow.close(target);
>      }
> });
>
>
>> Regards
>> Sven
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sven,
>>>
>>>
>>>   But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>>>>
>>>>   True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>>> "on"-prefix).
>>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
>>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
>>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
>>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
>>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
>>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>>>
>>> Thanks & best regards,
>>> Sebastien.
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Thanks a million!
Could you please publish SNAPSHOT so I can test it?

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> The change is rather big:
>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to use
> them with WebSocket.
> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason
> for
> > > the change :-)
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > > >
> > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > instead of
> > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> used
> > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > > > updated
> > > > > > component .....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank
> you
> > > for
> > > > > your
> > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of
> > the
> > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > seems
> > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > > getter
> > > > > for
> > > > > > >> it?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> > > because
> > > > > you
> > > > > > >> also
> > > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > > > resource
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > > > information
> > > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
> GMail...
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he
> > is
> > > > > going
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is
> > > being
> > > > > > used
> > > > > > >> in
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
> > Tobias
> > > > can
> > > > > > >> answer
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> this
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> question?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/
> > to
> > > > have
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> > > 7.0.0-M6
> > > > > and
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> lots
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
> "content-range"
> > > and
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this
> :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was
> > > > removed
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
> > *PackageResourceReference*
> > > as
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new
> > Video
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> --
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> --
> > > > > > >> >>>>> WBR
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > --
> > > > > > >> > WBR
> > > > > > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

Hi Sven,

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget to
> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>
> I don't think this change is too disruptive:

- client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>     modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>

What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
exactly like ModalWindow#close().
He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
WebSocket response.
This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of the
parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
will have to fix the compilation error.

> - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
>     AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>

It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is OK.
The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this is
needed.

> - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
>     find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>

Those are good changes!

>
> If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature
> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
> without breaking the API.

No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.

>
>
>  we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit
>> concerned
>>
>
> So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further instead
> of 2 steps back.
>

IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does this
from time to time).
Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:

MyComponent.java:

add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
IWebSocketPushMessage message)
    {
       AjaxRequestTarget target =
WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
       modalWindow.close(target);
    }
});

>
> Regards
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
>
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>>
>>  But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>>>
>>>
>>>  True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>> "on"-prefix).
>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>>
>> Thanks & best regards,
>> Sebastien.
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.

Hi,

I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget 
to IPartialPageRequestHandler.

I don't think this change is too disruptive:
- client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
     modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
- all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
     AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
- a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with 
IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
     find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)

If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature 
to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
without breaking the API.

>we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned

So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further instead 
of 2 steps back.

Regards
Sven


On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
>
>> But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>>
>>
> True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with "on"-prefix).
> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>
> Thanks & best regards,
> Sebastien.
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.

Hi Sven,


> But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>
>
True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with "on"-prefix).
In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
#close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
#find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.

Hi,

that change seems to have a hight impact - sorry, I didn't think of 
these implications.

 > But #add(Component...) is part of IPartialPageRequestHandler
 > so adding a component via websocket will not trigger 
IListener#onBeforeRespond

WebSockerRequestHandler#addListener() was a noop previously, so we don't 
lose anything here

 >I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
 >org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior#onTimer

Why, an Ajax timer is triggered by Ajax calls only, isn't it?

AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior#restart() and #stop() could be invoked from a 
WebSocket request though.

 >All signatures have to be checked ... AjaxRequestTarget or ... 
IPartialPageRequestHandler

I checked Wicket's code for methods that take ART as argument and having 
a name which doesn't start with an 'on'-prefix:
There are the two methods above and ModalWindow#show() and #close() that 
should be changed to IPartialPageRequestHandler. These are backwards 
compatible changes actually.

There are half a dozen calls to #find(AjaxRequestTarget.class) in Wicket 
classes which should switch from ART to IPartialPageRequestHandler, to 
restore cooperation with WebSockets.

But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?

Regards
Sven


On 08.07.2015 21:30, Sebastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, little bit late on the topic...
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> HI Maxim,
>>
>> This will lead to a big API break.
>> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
>> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
>> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>
> That's exactly the point I am worrying about... All signatures have to be
> checked to see whether or not it's an AjaxRequestTarget usage only or a
> method that can works with websockets too (and then change the signature to
> IPartialPageRequestHandler)... With the same idea,
> IListener/AbstractListener are part of ART. But #add(Component...) is part
> of IPartialPageRequestHandler, so adding a component via websocket will not
> trigger IListener#onBeforeRespond (1) ? This would probably lead to some
> unexpected behaviors, like for instance in Wicket jQuery UI where there is
> a "DestroyListener" (which handles the jquery #destroy of the widget)...
>
> Am I accurate on the analysis or did I missed a point?
>
> Thanks & best regards,
> Sebastien.
>
> (1) actually I never double checked this is the case, but on the
> principle/theoretically I guess it should be...
>
>
>
>> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
>> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Martin,
>>>
>>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>>
>>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The change is rather big:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>>>> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>>> use
>>>> them with WebSocket.
>>>> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>>>>
>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.

Hi,

Sorry, little bit late on the topic...

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> HI Maxim,
>
> This will lead to a big API break.
> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>

That's exactly the point I am worrying about... All signatures have to be
checked to see whether or not it's an AjaxRequestTarget usage only or a
method that can works with websockets too (and then change the signature to
IPartialPageRequestHandler)... With the same idea,
IListener/AbstractListener are part of ART. But #add(Component...) is part
of IPartialPageRequestHandler, so adding a component via websocket will not
trigger IListener#onBeforeRespond (1) ? This would probably lead to some
unexpected behaviors, like for instance in Wicket jQuery UI where there is
a "DestroyListener" (which handles the jquery #destroy of the widget)...

Am I accurate on the analysis or did I missed a point?

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

(1) actually I never double checked this is the case, but on the
principle/theoretically I guess it should be...

>
> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Martin,
>>
>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>
>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The change is rather big:
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>> > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>> use
>> > them with WebSocket.
>> > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>> >
>> > Martin Grigorov
>> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> > Wicket Training and Consulting
>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >
>>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Just have tried :)
hopefully it'll help :)

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> May it helps when you add me to your contact list.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 05.07.2015 um 07:40 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hello Tobias,
> >
> > Everything seems to work as expected!
> > sorry for the late response, your emails are still going into Spam :(((
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> @Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components?
> >> Otherwise I am going to vote +1
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>
> >>> OK, will try
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> HI Maxim,
> >>>>
> >>>> This will lead to a big API break.
> >>>> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to
> >> keep
> >>>> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
> >>>> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with
> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
> >>>>
> >>>> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
> >>>> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello Martin,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The change is rather big:
> >>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> >>>>>> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs
> to
> >>>>> use
> >>>>>> them with WebSocket.
> >>>>>> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> >>>>>>> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> >>>>>>>> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
> >>>> reason
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> the change :-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
> >>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> >>>>>>>>> instead of
> >>>>>>>>> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> >>>>>>>>>> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> >>>>>> used
> >>>>>>>>>>> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> >>>>>>>>>>> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> >>>>> push
> >>>>>>>>> updated
> >>>>>>>>>>> component .....
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Tobias!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
> >>>> Thank
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestions! :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> >>>>>>> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>>>>>>>>> seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't contain it :(
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> >>>>>>>>>>> PageParameters
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add
> >>>> public
> >>>>>>>> getter
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best
> >>>> practice,
> >>>>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> resource
> >>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For
> >>>>> more
> >>>>>>>>>>> information
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
> >>>>>> GMail...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight
> >>>> and
> >>>>> he
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> going
> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
> >>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why
> >>>> PackageResourceReference
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> being
> >>>>>>>>>>> used
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
> >>>>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not
> >>>>> enough...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim
> >>>> Solodovnik
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update
> >>>>> http://www.wicket-library.com/
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket7
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples as well?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del
> >>>> bene <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project
> >>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> >>>>>>>> 7.0.0-M6
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
> >>>>>> "content-range"
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for
> >>>> this
> >>>>>> :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself
> >>>>> (was
> >>>>>>>>> removed
> >>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
> >>>>>>> *PackageResourceReference*
> >>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding
> >>>> new
> >>>>>>> Video
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>>>>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> WBR
> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> WBR
> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.

May it helps when you add me to your contact list. 

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 05.07.2015 um 07:40 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Hello Tobias,
> 
> Everything seems to work as expected!
> sorry for the late response, your emails are still going into Spam :(((
> 
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> @Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components?
>> Otherwise I am going to vote +1
>> 
>> kind regards
>> 
>> Tobias
>> 
>>> Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> OK, will try
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> HI Maxim,
>>>> 
>>>> This will lead to a big API break.
>>>> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to
>> keep
>>>> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
>>>> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>>> 
>>>> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
>>>> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>>>> 
>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Martin,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>>>> 
>>>>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The change is rather big:
>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>>>>>> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>>>>> use
>>>>>> them with WebSocket.
>>>>>> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
>>>>>>> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
>>>>>>>> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
>>>> reason
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the change :-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
>>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
>>>>>>>>>> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
>>>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>>> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
>>>>>>>>>>> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
>>>>> push
>>>>>>>>> updated
>>>>>>>>>>> component .....
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Tobias!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
>>>> Thank
>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestions! :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
>>>>> of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
>>>>>>> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't contain it :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
>>>>>>>>>>> PageParameters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add
>>>> public
>>>>>>>> getter
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best
>>>> practice,
>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> resource
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For
>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will do migration and examine examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
>>>>>> GMail...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight
>>>> and
>>>>> he
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why
>>>> PackageResourceReference
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not
>>>>> enough...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim
>>>> Solodovnik
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update
>>>>> http://www.wicket-library.com/
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del
>>>> bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
>>>>>>>> 7.0.0-M6
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
>>>>>> "content-range"
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for
>>>> this
>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself
>>>>> (was
>>>>>>>>> removed
>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
>>>>>>> *PackageResourceReference*
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding
>>>> new
>>>>>>> Video
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Hello Tobias,

Everything seems to work as expected!
sorry for the late response, your emails are still going into Spam :(((

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> @Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components?
> Otherwise I am going to vote +1
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > OK, will try
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> HI Maxim,
> >>
> >> This will lead to a big API break.
> >> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to
> keep
> >> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
> >> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
> >>
> >> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
> >> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Martin,
> >>>
> >>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The change is rather big:
> >>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> >>>> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
> >>> use
> >>>> them with WebSocket.
> >>>> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> >>>>> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> >>>>>> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
> >> reason
> >>>> for
> >>>>>> the change :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
> >> be
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> >>>>>>> instead of
> >>>>>>> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> >>>>>>>> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> >>>> used
> >>>>>>>>> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> >>>>>>>>> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> >>> push
> >>>>>>> updated
> >>>>>>>>> component .....
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Tobias!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
> >> Thank
> >>>> you
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>> suggestions! :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> >>> of
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> >>>>> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>>>>>>> seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't contain it :(
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> >>>>>>>>> PageParameters
> >>>>>>>>>>>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add
> >> public
> >>>>>> getter
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>> it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best
> >> practice,
> >>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option
> >>> the
> >>>>>>> resource
> >>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For
> >>> more
> >>>>>>>>> information
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
> >>>> GMail...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight
> >> and
> >>> he
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> going
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
> >> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why
> >> PackageResourceReference
> >>> is
> >>>>>> being
> >>>>>>>>> used
> >>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
> >>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>> answer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not
> >>> enough...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim
> >> Solodovnik
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update
> >>> http://www.wicket-library.com/
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket7
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples as well?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del
> >> bene <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> >>>>>> 7.0.0-M6
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
> >>>> "content-range"
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for
> >> this
> >>>> :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself
> >>> (was
> >>>>>>> removed
> >>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
> >>>>> *PackageResourceReference*
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding
> >> new
> >>>>> Video
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> WBR
> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> WBR
> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.

@Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components? Otherwise I am going to vote +1

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> 
> OK, will try
> Thanks
> 
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> HI Maxim,
>> 
>> This will lead to a big API break.
>> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
>> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
>> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>> 
>> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
>> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello Martin,
>>> 
>>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>> 
>>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The change is rather big:
>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>>>> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>>> use
>>>> them with WebSocket.
>>>> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>>>> 
>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
>>>>> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
>>>>>> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
>> reason
>>>> for
>>>>>> the change :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
>> be
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
>>>>>>>> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
>>>> used
>>>>>>>>> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
>>>>>>>>> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
>>> push
>>>>>>> updated
>>>>>>>>> component .....
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Tobias!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
>> Thank
>>>> you
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> suggestions! :-)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
>>> of
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
>>>>> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't contain it :(
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
>>>>>>>>> PageParameters
>>>>>>>>>>>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add
>> public
>>>>>> getter
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best
>> practice,
>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option
>>> the
>>>>>>> resource
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For
>>> more
>>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will do migration and examine examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
>>>> GMail...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight
>> and
>>> he
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improve it tonight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can you please tell me why
>> PackageResourceReference
>>> is
>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not
>>> enough...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim
>> Solodovnik
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible update
>>> http://www.wicket-library.com/
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del
>> bene <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
>>>>>> 7.0.0-M6
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
>>>> "content-range"
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for
>> this
>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself
>>> (was
>>>>>>> removed
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
>>>>> *PackageResourceReference*
>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding
>> new
>>>>> Video
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Component?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

OK, will try
Thanks

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> HI Maxim,
>
> This will lead to a big API break.
> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>
> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Martin,
> >
> > I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
> >
> > org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The change is rather big:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> > > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
> > use
> > > them with WebSocket.
> > > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > > > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
> reason
> > > for
> > > > > the change :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
> be
> > > > > >
> > > > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > > > instead of
> > > > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> > > used
> > > > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> > push
> > > > > > updated
> > > > > > > > component .....
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
> Thank
> > > you
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > > > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add
> public
> > > > > getter
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > >> it?
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best
> practice,
> > > > > because
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > >> also
> > > > > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option
> > the
> > > > > > resource
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For
> > more
> > > > > > > > information
> > > > > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > > > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
> > > GMail...
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > > > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight
> and
> > he
> > > > is
> > > > > > > going
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
> <
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why
> PackageResourceReference
> > is
> > > > > being
> > > > > > > > used
> > > > > > > > >> in
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
> > > > Tobias
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > >> answer
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> this
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> question?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not
> > enough...
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim
> Solodovnik
> > <
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update
> > http://www.wicket-library.com/
> > > > to
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del
> bene <
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project
> in
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> > > > > 7.0.0-M6
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> lots
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
> > > "content-range"
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for
> this
> > > :)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself
> > (was
> > > > > > removed
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
> > > > *PackageResourceReference*
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding
> new
> > > > Video
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> --
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> --
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> WBR
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > --
> > > > > > > > >> > WBR
> > > > > > > > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

Hi Sebastien,

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry, little bit late on the topic...
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> HI Maxim,
>>
>> This will lead to a big API break.
>> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
>> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
>> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>
>
> That's exactly the point I am worrying about... All signatures have to be
> checked to see whether or not it's an AjaxRequestTarget usage only or a
> method that can works with websockets too (and then change the signature to
> IPartialPageRequestHandler)... With the same idea,
> IListener/AbstractListener are part of ART. But #add(Component...) is part
> of IPartialPageRequestHandler, so adding a component via websocket will not
> trigger IListener#onBeforeRespond (1) ? This would probably lead to some
> unexpected behaviors, like for instance in Wicket jQuery UI where there is
> a "DestroyListener" (which handles the jquery #destroy of the widget)...
>
> Am I accurate on the analysis or did I missed a point?
>

You are correct!
But this is the case even now (in Wicket 6.x) because
WebSocketRequestHandler has empty implementations of the listener related
methods:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/wicket-6.x/wicket-native-websocket/wicket-native-websocket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/protocol/ws/api/WebSocketRequestHandler.java#L72-L82

There is a workaround though - it is very easy to create AjaxRequestHandler
out of IPartialPageRequestHandler and use it when this is needed.


>
> Thanks & best regards,
> Sebastien.
>
> (1) actually I never double checked this is the case, but on the
> principle/theoretically I guess it should be...
>
>
>
>>
>> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
>> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Martin,
>>>
>>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>>
>>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The change is rather big:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>>> > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>>> use
>>> > them with WebSocket.
>>> > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>>> >
>>> > Martin Grigorov
>>> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>> > Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>> >
>>>
>>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

HI Maxim,

This will lead to a big API break.
If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.

We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Martin,
>
> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>
> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > The change is rather big:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
> use
> > them with WebSocket.
> > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason
> > for
> > > > the change :-)
> > > >
> > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > > > >
> > > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > > instead of
> > > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> > used
> > > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> push
> > > > > updated
> > > > > > > component .....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank
> > you
> > > > for
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > > > getter
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > >> it?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> > > > because
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > >> also
> > > > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option
> the
> > > > > resource
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For
> more
> > > > > > > information
> > > > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
> > GMail...
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and
> he
> > > is
> > > > > > going
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference
> is
> > > > being
> > > > > > > used
> > > > > > > >> in
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
> > > Tobias
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > >> answer
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> this
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> question?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not
> enough...
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
> <
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update
> http://www.wicket-library.com/
> > > to
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> > > > 7.0.0-M6
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> lots
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
> > "content-range"
> > > > and
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this
> > :)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself
> (was
> > > > > removed
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
> > > *PackageResourceReference*
> > > > as
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new
> > > Video
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> --
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> --
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> WBR
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > --
> > > > > > > >> > WBR
> > > > > > > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Hello Martin,

I guess following method need to be additionally updated:

org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> The change is rather big:
>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to use
> them with WebSocket.
> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason
> for
> > > the change :-)
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > > >
> > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > instead of
> > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> used
> > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > > > updated
> > > > > > component .....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank
> you
> > > for
> > > > > your
> > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of
> > the
> > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > seems
> > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > > getter
> > > > > for
> > > > > > >> it?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> > > because
> > > > > you
> > > > > > >> also
> > > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > > > resource
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > > > information
> > > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by
> GMail...
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he
> > is
> > > > > going
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is
> > > being
> > > > > > used
> > > > > > >> in
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
> > Tobias
> > > > can
> > > > > > >> answer
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> this
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> question?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/
> > to
> > > > have
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> > > 7.0.0-M6
> > > > > and
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> lots
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports
> "content-range"
> > > and
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this
> :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was
> > > > removed
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
> > *PackageResourceReference*
> > > as
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new
> > Video
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> --
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> --
> > > > > > >> >>>>> WBR
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > --
> > > > > > >> > WBR
> > > > > > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

The change is rather big:
https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to use
them with WebSocket.
The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason for
> > the change :-)
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > >
> > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > instead of
> > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > >
> > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > > updated
> > > > > component .....
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you
> > for
> > > > your
> > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of
> the
> > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > seems
> > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > getter
> > > > for
> > > > > >> it?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> > because
> > > > you
> > > > > >> also
> > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > > resource
> > > > > is
> > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > > information
> > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he
> is
> > > > going
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is
> > being
> > > > > used
> > > > > >> in
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe
> Tobias
> > > can
> > > > > >> answer
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> this
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> question?
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/
> to
> > > have
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> > 7.0.0-M6
> > > > and
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> lots
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range"
> > and
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was
> > > removed
> > > > > from
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires
> *PackageResourceReference*
> > as
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new
> Video
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> --
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> --
> > > > > >> >>>>> WBR
> > > > > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > --
> > > > > >> > WBR
> > > > > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason for
> the change :-)
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> >
> > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > instead of
> > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > updated
> > > > component .....
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you
> for
> > > your
> > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> kind regards
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Tobias
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > seems
> > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > PageParameters
> > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> getter
> > > for
> > > > >> it?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> because
> > > you
> > > > >> also
> > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > resource
> > > > is
> > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > information
> > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is
> > > going
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is
> being
> > > > used
> > > > >> in
> > > > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias
> > can
> > > > >> answer
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> this
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> question?
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to
> > have
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff
> 7.0.0-M6
> > > and
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> lots
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range"
> and
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was
> > removed
> > > > from
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference*
> as
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> --
> > > > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > > > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> --
> > > > >> >>>>> WBR
> > > > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > WBR
> > > > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

@Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason for
the change :-)

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
>
> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> instead of
> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> updated
> > > component .....
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > >>
> > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> > your
> > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > >>
> > > >> kind regards
> > > >>
> > > >> Tobias
> > > >>
> > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > seems
> > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > >> >
> > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > PageParameters
> > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter
> > for
> > > >> it?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> > you
> > > >> also
> > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> resource
> > > is
> > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > information
> > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> kind regards
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Tobias
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is
> > going
> > > to
> > > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> > > used
> > > >> in
> > > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias
> can
> > > >> answer
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> this
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> question?
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to
> have
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6
> > and
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> lots
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was
> removed
> > > from
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> --
> > > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> --
> > > >> >>>>> WBR
> > > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > WBR
> > > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

@Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be

public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
instead of
public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)

Thanks in advance!


On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push updated
> > component .....
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Maxim,
> > >>
> > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> your
> > >> suggestions! :-)
> > >>
> > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > >>
> > >> kind regards
> > >>
> > >> Tobias
> > >>
> > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> seems
> > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > >> >
> > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > PageParameters
> > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter
> for
> > >> it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks in advance
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > >> >>
> > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> you
> > >> also
> > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> > is
> > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > information
> > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> kind regards
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Tobias
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is
> going
> > to
> > >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> > >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> > used
> > >> in
> > >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > >> answer
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> this
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> question?
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> > >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> > >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6
> and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> lots
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> of
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed
> > from
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>> WBR
> > >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> --
> > >> >>>>> WBR
> > >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > WBR
> > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.

Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push updated
> component .....
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> >> suggestions! :-)
> >>
> >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> >> > doesn't contain it :(
> >> >
> >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> PageParameters
> >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> >> it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Maxim,
> >> >>
> >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >> >>
> >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> >> also
> >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> is
> >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> information
> >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >> >>
> >> >> kind regards
> >> >>
> >> >> Tobias
> >> >>
> >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> >> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax666@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >> >>>>> Thanks!
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> to
> >> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> >> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> used
> >> in
> >> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> >> answer
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> this
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> question?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> >> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> examples as well?
> >> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> found
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> lots
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> of
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed
> from
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>> WBR
> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> WBR
> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > WBR
> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push updated
component .....

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks a lot Tobias!
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
>> suggestions! :-)
>>
>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
>> > doesn't contain it :(
>> >
>> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
>> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
>> it?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Maxim,
>> >>
>> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>> >>
>> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
>> also
>> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
>> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
>> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>> >>
>> >> kind regards
>> >>
>> >> Tobias
>> >>
>> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks a lot!
>> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>> >>> will do migration and examine examples
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Martin Grigorov
>> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax666@gmail.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
>> >>>>> Thanks!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
>> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
>> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
>> in
>> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
>> answer
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> this
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> question?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
>> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> wicket7
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> examples as well?
>> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> found
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> lots
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>> WBR
>> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> WBR
>> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> WBR
>> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.

Thanks a lot Tobias!

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> suggestions! :-)
>
> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
> server. However the build was triggered already.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > doesn't contain it :(
> >
> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>
> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> also
> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> >>>>>> improve it tonight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
> >>>>>>> will look through sources :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> in
> >>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> answer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> question?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Everything is possible.
> >>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wicket7
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> examples as well?
> >>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> found
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> lots
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> improvements:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
> >>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Component?
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> WBR
> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.

Hi Maxim,

no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your suggestions! :-)

Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> doesn't contain it :(
> 
> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Maxim,
>> 
>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> 
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>> 
>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you also
>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>> 
>> kind regards
>> 
>> Tobias
>> 
>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>>> will do migration and examine examples
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>>>> 
>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> sorry, most probably missed that email
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
>>>>>> improve it tonight.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>> 
>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks Martin :)
>>>>>>> will look through sources :)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
>>>>>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> this
>>>>> 
>>>>>> question?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org
>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Everything is possible.
>>>>>>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wicket7
>>>>> 
>>>>>> examples as well?
>>>>>>>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> an.delbene@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>> 
>>>>>> lots
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> "accept-range"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>>>>>>>>>>> wicketstuff)
>>>>>>>>>>> which is great :))
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> resourceReference
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Component?
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org