You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org> on 2007/02/03 09:39:28 UTC
[VOTE] Upgrade Derby dependency from 10.2.1.6 to 10.2.2.0
In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I propose
we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby database &
JDBC driver for our testing and distribution zip from Derby 10.2.1.6
to the latest public version 10.2.2.0. This won't affect any core
code or behavior at all, it will only affect the testing and the
Derby database jar we provide with the distribution.
A vote of +1 approves the upgrade, a vote of -1 indicates that you
don't think we should upgrade.
Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Derby dependency from 10.2.1.6 to 10.2.2.0
Posted by Bruce Benfield <bb...@us.ibm.com>.
+1
lurking
Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>
02/03/2007 06:25 PM
Please respond to
open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Derby dependency from 10.2.1.6 to 10.2.2.0
+1
-dain
On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I
> propose we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby
> database & JDBC driver for our testing and distribution zip from
> Derby 10.2.1.6 to the latest public version 10.2.2.0. This won't
> affect any core code or behavior at all, it will only affect the
> testing and the Derby database jar we provide with the distribution.
>
> A vote of +1 approves the upgrade, a vote of -1 indicates that you
> don't think we should upgrade.
>
Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Derby dependency from 10.2.1.6 to 10.2.2.0
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1
-dain
On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I
> propose we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby
> database & JDBC driver for our testing and distribution zip from
> Derby 10.2.1.6 to the latest public version 10.2.2.0. This won't
> affect any core code or behavior at all, it will only affect the
> testing and the Derby database jar we provide with the distribution.
>
> A vote of +1 approves the upgrade, a vote of -1 indicates that you
> don't think we should upgrade.
>
[VOTE RESULT] Upgrade Derby dependency from 10.2.1.6 to 10.2.2.0
Posted by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org>.
With 5 votes in favor, and none opposed, the vote passes. I've
updated the dependencies in the appropriate pom.xml files and committed.
Thanks to all who voted!
On Feb 9, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
> +1 (belated).
>
> On 2/4/07, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I
>> > propose we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby
>> > database & JDBC driver for our testing and distribution zip from
>> > Derby 10.2.1.6 to the latest public version 10.2.2.0. This won't
>> > affect any core code or behavior at all, it will only affect the
>> > testing and the Derby database jar we provide with the
>> distribution.
>> >
>> > A vote of +1 approves the upgrade, a vote of -1 indicates that you
>> > don't think we should upgrade.
>> >
>>
>> Craig Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/
>> jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>> --
> -Michael Dick
Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Derby dependency from 10.2.1.6 to 10.2.2.0
Posted by Michael Dick <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1 (belated).
On 2/4/07, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Craig
>
> On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> >
> > In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I
> > propose we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby
> > database & JDBC driver for our testing and distribution zip from
> > Derby 10.2.1.6 to the latest public version 10.2.2.0. This won't
> > affect any core code or behavior at all, it will only affect the
> > testing and the Derby database jar we provide with the distribution.
> >
> > A vote of +1 approves the upgrade, a vote of -1 indicates that you
> > don't think we should upgrade.
> >
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
> --
-Michael Dick
Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Derby dependency from 10.2.1.6 to 10.2.2.0
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
+1
Craig
On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I
> propose we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby
> database & JDBC driver for our testing and distribution zip from
> Derby 10.2.1.6 to the latest public version 10.2.2.0. This won't
> affect any core code or behavior at all, it will only affect the
> testing and the Derby database jar we provide with the distribution.
>
> A vote of +1 approves the upgrade, a vote of -1 indicates that you
> don't think we should upgrade.
>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!