You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2011/06/02 17:17:45 UTC
Happy happy joy joy
Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
get very far.
This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
and argue about who-killed-who... :)
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:11 AM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote on 06/02/2011 10:25:20
> AM:
>
>>>
>>> I trust I do not need to explain at length to an Apache PMC the
> relative
>>> merits of the Apache 2.0 license or the strengths and stability of the
>>> ASF. I'll take it as granted that this is well-known to you all. In
> any
>>> case I am a strict adherent to the practical wisdom of not debating
> open
>>> source licenses while sober, and I decline to make an exception in
> this
>>> case.
>>
>> Rob, it may come as a surprise to you: But what I wrote was in no way
>> related to a particular license. I would have written just the same,
>> if Apache would use the LGPL/MPL and LibreOffice where ASL licensed.
>>
>> The point I am trying to make is that it is (IMO) in noone's interest
>> to create a second community (!), the exception (at least it seems)
>> being IBM. Everyone else would be just as happy or even happier if the
>> OO code base, trademarks, etc. where simply donated to TDF.
>>
>
> Respectfully, Jochen, that is your opinion, but it disproved with every
> non-IBM name added to the wiki.
>
> Despite TDF press releases, there was never unanimous support for
> LibreOffice among members of the OpenOffice.org community. We're seeing
> some of them stand up now and be counted.
>
> What is best for them? Really? Do you really want to tell them what is
> best for them, what will make everyone happy?!
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The butler did it.
:-)
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
>> and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
>> get very far.
>>
>> This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
>> and argue about who-killed-who... :)
+1
If anything needs recording then submit a (documentation) patch ;-)
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 04:31 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>
>> The butler did it.
>
> yeah, the new butler, jenkins, killed the old one, hudson as hudson was
> getting too noise for a staff member of the household.
ROFL :-)
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
On 06/02/2011 04:31 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> The butler did it.
yeah, the new butler, jenkins, killed the old one, hudson as hudson was
getting too noise for a staff member of the household.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com>.
The butler did it.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
> and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
> get very far.
>
> This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
> and argue about who-killed-who... :)
>
> On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:11 AM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>> Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote on 06/02/2011 10:25:20
>> AM:
>>
>>>>
>>>> I trust I do not need to explain at length to an Apache PMC the
>> relative
>>>> merits of the Apache 2.0 license or the strengths and stability of the
>>>> ASF. I'll take it as granted that this is well-known to you all. In
>> any
>>>> case I am a strict adherent to the practical wisdom of not debating
>> open
>>>> source licenses while sober, and I decline to make an exception in
>> this
>>>> case.
>>>
>>> Rob, it may come as a surprise to you: But what I wrote was in no way
>>> related to a particular license. I would have written just the same,
>>> if Apache would use the LGPL/MPL and LibreOffice where ASL licensed.
>>>
>>> The point I am trying to make is that it is (IMO) in noone's interest
>>> to create a second community (!), the exception (at least it seems)
>>> being IBM. Everyone else would be just as happy or even happier if the
>>> OO code base, trademarks, etc. where simply donated to TDF.
>>>
>>
>> Respectfully, Jochen, that is your opinion, but it disproved with every
>> non-IBM name added to the wiki.
>>
>> Despite TDF press releases, there was never unanimous support for
>> LibreOffice among members of the OpenOffice.org community. We're seeing
>> some of them stand up now and be counted.
>>
>> What is best for them? Really? Do you really want to tell them what is
>> best for them, what will make everyone happy?!
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 6/8/2011 11:12 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
>
> No definitive indicator for the latter, but if it consumes parts of
> the other, then it must be the former ...
I believe the proper question is "What is the airspeed velocity of an AL laden,
GPL swallow?" (seeing as an AL swallow can't lift GPL).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
No definitive indicator for the latter, but if it consumes parts of
the other, then it must be the former ...
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
everyone.
John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com>.
Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
>>> and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
>>> get very far.
>>>
>>> This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
>>> and argue about who-killed-who... :)
>>>
>>
>> If this is an attempt for reconciliation, it's somewhat poor ;-)
>> And the last paragraph, quite ambiguous.
>>
>> You say 'bicker', which can be interpreted as a way to dissuade people
>> from discussing.
>> Do you feel people are bickering? The whole affair is a big issue, and
>> what I detect
>> is an attitude that it would better just not to discuss the touchy
>> issues, as if they will go away.
>
> Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jun 7, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
>> and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
>> get very far.
>>
>> This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
>> and argue about who-killed-who... :)
>>
>
> If this is an attempt for reconciliation, it's somewhat poor ;-)
> And the last paragraph, quite ambiguous.
>
> You say 'bicker', which can be interpreted as a way to dissuade people
> from discussing.
> Do you feel people are bickering? The whole affair is a big issue, and
> what I detect
> is an attitude that it would better just not to discuss the touchy
> issues, as if they will go away.
Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Happy happy joy joy
Posted by Simos Xenitellis <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
> and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
> get very far.
>
> This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
> and argue about who-killed-who... :)
>
If this is an attempt for reconciliation, it's somewhat poor ;-)
And the last paragraph, quite ambiguous.
You say 'bicker', which can be interpreted as a way to dissuade people
from discussing.
Do you feel people are bickering? The whole affair is a big issue, and
what I detect
is an attitude that it would better just not to discuss the touchy
issues, as if they will go away.
Simos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org