You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@day.com> on 2009/10/16 12:01:57 UTC
Re: should we have mixin type or add new non mandatory properties to
the primary type node
hi,
i would add them as mixin, especially if the new properties belong to
a new semantic group. if you just forgot to add some properties on
the primary, i would just add them there.
regards toby
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Vijay K Pandey <VP...@mdes.ms.gov> wrote:
> Hello Users,
>
> We have been using JackRabbit in production env from last couple of years (currently 1.5) and we have around 5 million nodes in the repository.
>
> We have come across a new business rule in our system where we have to add couple of "new properties" on some specific condition to any new node that we add to the repository.
>
> My question is should we go ahead and have a mixin type for this or add these properties as non mandatory to the primary node type.
>
> Any advise will be really appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Vijay
>