You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by ep...@apache.org on 2004/11/23 20:37:26 UTC

cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/security/adapters/turbine project.xml

epugh       2004/11/23 11:37:26

  Modified:    security/adapters/turbine project.xml
  Log:
  add xstream
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.15      +11 -2     jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/security/adapters/turbine/project.xml
  
  Index: project.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/security/adapters/turbine/project.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.14
  retrieving revision 1.15
  diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
  --- project.xml	6 Nov 2004 12:33:07 -0000	1.14
  +++ project.xml	23 Nov 2004 19:37:25 -0000	1.15
  @@ -49,8 +49,17 @@
       <dependency>
         <groupId>turbine</groupId>
         <artifactId>turbine</artifactId>
  -      <version>2.3</version>
  -    </dependency>    
  +      <!--version>2.3</version-->
  +      <version>20041018.180618</version>
  +    </dependency>   
  +    <dependency>
  +      <groupId>xstream</groupId>
  +      <artifactId>xstream</artifactId>
  +      <version>1.0.2</version>
  +      <url>http://xstream.codehaus.org/</url>
  +
  +    </dependency>
  +
       <dependency>
         <groupId>servletapi</groupId>
         <artifactId>servletapi</artifactId>
  
  
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


RE: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/security/adapters/turbine project.xml

Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@upstate.com>.
I agree.  Maven the next version of so has a lot more information in the
version, including tag information.  I am debating on the Fulcrum front of
moving things like the Turbine adapter for security back into Turbine CVS as
an extension...

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:hps@intermeta.de]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 3:22 PM
> To: turbine-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cvs commit:
> jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/security/adapters/turbine project.xml
>
>
> epugh@apache.org writes:
>
> >         <artifactId>turbine</artifactId>
> >  -      <version>2.3</version>
> >  -    </dependency>
> >  +      <!--version>2.3</version-->
> >  +      <version>20041018.180618</version>
> >  +    </dependency>
>
> *Cough*. And this is, where Maven (again) breaks down. Your
> 20041018.180618 jar is newer than my 20041016.123304 jar but it is not
> a 2.3 Branch jar, but a 2.4 Branch jar...
>
> This whole snapshot / time version jar business was a bad idea from
> the start.
>
> 	Regards
> 		Henning
>
> --
> Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
> hps@intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
>
> RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
>    Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
>
> What is more important to you...
>    [ ] Product Security
> or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
>               -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/security/adapters/turbine project.xml

Posted by "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hp...@intermeta.de>.
epugh@apache.org writes:

>         <artifactId>turbine</artifactId>
>  -      <version>2.3</version>
>  -    </dependency>    
>  +      <!--version>2.3</version-->
>  +      <version>20041018.180618</version>
>  +    </dependency>   

*Cough*. And this is, where Maven (again) breaks down. Your
20041018.180618 jar is newer than my 20041016.123304 jar but it is not
a 2.3 Branch jar, but a 2.4 Branch jar...

This whole snapshot / time version jar business was a bad idea from
the start.

	Regards
		Henning

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

What is more important to you...
   [ ] Product Security
or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
              -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org