You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tephra.apache.org by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> on 2017/09/14 03:31:39 UTC
[VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13.0-incubating-rc1/src
The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
The Nexus Staging URL:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1009
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Thanks,
Andreas
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>.
Thanks, Alan. I have updated the PR (
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tephra/pull/60) with the suggested
changes.
Gokul
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Alan.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > From https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b, looks like
> EPL
> > license in binary should be alright.
> >
> > I will modify the PR to put the LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY and the
> > licenses directory under tephra-distribution directory. I will also
> remove
> > any references to LGPL/FindBugsJSR305 in those files. Also, I will add a
> > README in tephra-distribution directory that mentions that the
> dependencies
> > with the licenses mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE/licenses will be included
> in
> > the distribution that will be generated when the user builds it manually
> > (and that the binary distribution is not distributed by Apache Tephra).
> >
> > Let me know if that sounds good to you.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gokul
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, so I think you are saying all of these licenses only apply to the
> > > binary release. I am skeptical about packaging LGPL even in a binary
> > > release and would want input from those more steeped in Apache rules
> than
> > > me. But the others are ok once combined with the stuff in the
> > > tephra-distribution directory. I’d just combine the licenses directory
> > > with that directory and perhaps include a README so it’s clear how the
> > > pieces fit together.
> > >
> > > Alan.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alan,
> > > >
> > > > this is a pure source distribution, and it does not include binaries,
> > and
> > > > the top-level LICENSE file includes only the Apache license.
> > > >
> > > > However, we were advised in the previous release vote that we need to
> > > > include these licenses in the tephra-distribution directory. See here
> > for
> > > > reference:
> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> > general/201705.mbox/%
> > > > 3CCAOqetn-BFk8uHj89Rix2ozJYfuZ9FidSH7xRj
> EvKJ%3Dr0YbJdtA%40mail.gmail.
> > > > com%3E
> > > >
> > > > How do you advise we address this? Any guidance would be appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks -Andreas.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -1
> > > > >
> > > > > This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
> > > > > unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide
> > indicated
> > > > > which parts of the code are under which licenses.
> > > > >
> > > > > See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of
> > > allowed
> > > > > licenses.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not
> > > > allowed
> > > > > in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
> > > > > artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > > public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
> > > > >
> > > > > It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code
> > > Tephra
> > > > is
> > > > > using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I
> > don’t
> > > > > believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under
> > > which
> > > > > licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these
> > > other
> > > > > licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alan.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <
> > jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <anew@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > > found
> > > > > at:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > > > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > > > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > > > > git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachetephra-1009
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > > > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
Alan.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> From https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b, looks like EPL
> license in binary should be alright.
>
> I will modify the PR to put the LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY and the
> licenses directory under tephra-distribution directory. I will also remove
> any references to LGPL/FindBugsJSR305 in those files. Also, I will add a
> README in tephra-distribution directory that mentions that the dependencies
> with the licenses mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE/licenses will be included in
> the distribution that will be generated when the user builds it manually
> (and that the binary distribution is not distributed by Apache Tephra).
>
> Let me know if that sounds good to you.
>
> Thanks,
> Gokul
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, so I think you are saying all of these licenses only apply to the
> > binary release. I am skeptical about packaging LGPL even in a binary
> > release and would want input from those more steeped in Apache rules than
> > me. But the others are ok once combined with the stuff in the
> > tephra-distribution directory. I’d just combine the licenses directory
> > with that directory and perhaps include a README so it’s clear how the
> > pieces fit together.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alan,
> > >
> > > this is a pure source distribution, and it does not include binaries,
> and
> > > the top-level LICENSE file includes only the Apache license.
> > >
> > > However, we were advised in the previous release vote that we need to
> > > include these licenses in the tephra-distribution directory. See here
> for
> > > reference:
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> general/201705.mbox/%
> > > 3CCAOqetn-BFk8uHj89Rix2ozJYfuZ9FidSH7xRjEvKJ%3Dr0YbJdtA%40mail.gmail.
> > > com%3E
> > >
> > > How do you advise we address this? Any guidance would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks -Andreas.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > -1
> > > >
> > > > This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
> > > > unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide
> indicated
> > > > which parts of the code are under which licenses.
> > > >
> > > > See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of
> > allowed
> > > > licenses.
> > > >
> > > > In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not
> > > allowed
> > > > in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
> > > > artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code
> into
> > > the
> > > > public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
> > > >
> > > > It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code
> > Tephra
> > > is
> > > > using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I
> don’t
> > > > believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
> > > >
> > > > And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under
> > which
> > > > licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these
> > other
> > > > licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
> > > > https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
> > > >
> > > > Alan.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > found
> > > > at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > > > git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachetephra-1009
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>.
Hi Alan,
From https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b, looks like EPL
license in binary should be alright.
I will modify the PR to put the LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY and the
licenses directory under tephra-distribution directory. I will also remove
any references to LGPL/FindBugsJSR305 in those files. Also, I will add a
README in tephra-distribution directory that mentions that the dependencies
with the licenses mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE/licenses will be included in
the distribution that will be generated when the user builds it manually
(and that the binary distribution is not distributed by Apache Tephra).
Let me know if that sounds good to you.
Thanks,
Gokul
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, so I think you are saying all of these licenses only apply to the
> binary release. I am skeptical about packaging LGPL even in a binary
> release and would want input from those more steeped in Apache rules than
> me. But the others are ok once combined with the stuff in the
> tephra-distribution directory. I’d just combine the licenses directory
> with that directory and perhaps include a README so it’s clear how the
> pieces fit together.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > this is a pure source distribution, and it does not include binaries, and
> > the top-level LICENSE file includes only the Apache license.
> >
> > However, we were advised in the previous release vote that we need to
> > include these licenses in the tephra-distribution directory. See here for
> > reference:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201705.mbox/%
> > 3CCAOqetn-BFk8uHj89Rix2ozJYfuZ9FidSH7xRjEvKJ%3Dr0YbJdtA%40mail.gmail.
> > com%3E
> >
> > How do you advise we address this? Any guidance would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks -Andreas.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > -1
> > >
> > > This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
> > > unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide indicated
> > > which parts of the code are under which licenses.
> > >
> > > See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of
> allowed
> > > licenses.
> > >
> > > In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not
> > allowed
> > > in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
> > > artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code into
> > the
> > > public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
> > >
> > > It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code
> Tephra
> > is
> > > using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I don’t
> > > believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
> > >
> > > And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under
> which
> > > licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these
> other
> > > licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
> > > https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
> > >
> > > Alan.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > >
> > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found
> > > at:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> > > > >
> > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > >
> > > > > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > > git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> > > > >
> > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachetephra-1009
> > > > >
> > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > >
> > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andreas
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>.
Ok, so I think you are saying all of these licenses only apply to the
binary release. I am skeptical about packaging LGPL even in a binary
release and would want input from those more steeped in Apache rules than
me. But the others are ok once combined with the stuff in the
tephra-distribution directory. I’d just combine the licenses directory
with that directory and perhaps include a README so it’s clear how the
pieces fit together.
Alan.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> this is a pure source distribution, and it does not include binaries, and
> the top-level LICENSE file includes only the Apache license.
>
> However, we were advised in the previous release vote that we need to
> include these licenses in the tephra-distribution directory. See here for
> reference:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201705.mbox/%
> 3CCAOqetn-BFk8uHj89Rix2ozJYfuZ9FidSH7xRjEvKJ%3Dr0YbJdtA%40mail.gmail.
> com%3E
>
> How do you advise we address this? Any guidance would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks -Andreas.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > -1
> >
> > This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
> > unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide indicated
> > which parts of the code are under which licenses.
> >
> > See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of allowed
> > licenses.
> >
> > In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not
> allowed
> > in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
> > artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code into
> the
> > public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
> >
> > It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code Tephra
> is
> > using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I don’t
> > believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
> >
> > And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under which
> > licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these other
> > licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
> > https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> > > >
> > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachetephra-1009
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andreas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>.
Hi Alan,
this is a pure source distribution, and it does not include binaries, and
the top-level LICENSE file includes only the Apache license.
However, we were advised in the previous release vote that we need to
include these licenses in the tephra-distribution directory. See here for
reference:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201705.mbox/%3CCAOqetn-BFk8uHj89Rix2ozJYfuZ9FidSH7xRjEvKJ%3Dr0YbJdtA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
How do you advise we address this? Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks -Andreas.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
> unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide indicated
> which parts of the code are under which licenses.
>
> See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of allowed
> licenses.
>
> In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not allowed
> in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
> artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code into the
> public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
>
> It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code Tephra is
> using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I don’t
> believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
>
> And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under which
> licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these other
> licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
> https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> > >
> > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachetephra-1009
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>.
Not packaging findbugs is good. You should remove the reference to it from
the tephra-distribution/LICENSE file.
I don’t think putting the contents of tephra-distribution in the top level
directory is the best solution. I would just include the contents of the
license directory and the tephra-distribution library in the same place.
It doesn’t matter which directory you choose.
I’m not clear yet though whether the Logback Core Module (which is under
EPL) is included in binary or source form. If it’s in source form you
still have a problem.
Alan.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thanks for the review. In order to address the concerns that you have
> raised, can we do the following?
>
> i) Don't package findbugs jsr305 (LGPL) dependency in the tar.gz binary
> distribution (it is used only by IDE and it is not used in runtime, hence
> we can easily do this)
> ii) Move the LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY files to top directory (instead
> of placing them under tephra-distribution directory) for ease of access
>
> Let me know if the above two changes sufficiently address the concerns. I
> have opened a PR (https://github.com/apache/incubator-tephra/pull/60) that
> implements the above two changes, happy to make any further changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Gokul
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > -1
> >
> > This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
> > unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide indicated
> > which parts of the code are under which licenses.
> >
> > See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of allowed
> > licenses.
> >
> > In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not
> allowed
> > in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
> > artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code into
> the
> > public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
> >
> > It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code Tephra
> is
> > using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I don’t
> > believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
> >
> > And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under which
> > licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these other
> > licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
> > https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > > git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> > > >
> > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> > tephra-1009
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > > 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andreas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>.
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the review. In order to address the concerns that you have
raised, can we do the following?
i) Don't package findbugs jsr305 (LGPL) dependency in the tar.gz binary
distribution (it is used only by IDE and it is not used in runtime, hence
we can easily do this)
ii) Move the LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY files to top directory (instead
of placing them under tephra-distribution directory) for ease of access
Let me know if the above two changes sufficiently address the concerns. I
have opened a PR (https://github.com/apache/incubator-tephra/pull/60) that
implements the above two changes, happy to make any further changes.
Thanks,
Gokul
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
> unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide indicated
> which parts of the code are under which licenses.
>
> See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of allowed
> licenses.
>
> In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not allowed
> in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
> artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code into the
> public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
>
> It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code Tephra is
> using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I don’t
> believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
>
> And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under which
> licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these other
> licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
> https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> > git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> > >
> > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> tephra-1009
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> > 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>.
-1
This code appears to contain some artifacts that are licensed under
unnacceptable licenses. Further, I could not find any guide indicated
which parts of the code are under which licenses.
See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a summary of allowed
licenses.
In the licenses directory there is a copy of the LGPL (which is not allowed
in an Apache release), the EPL (which is allowed only for binary
artifacts), and Aopa.PL, which appears to be putting all the code into the
public domain (IANAL, so I might be reading it wrong).
It’s possible the Aopa part is ok as long it only applies to code Tephra is
using. The EPL might be ok if it’s only for binary artifacts. I don’t
believe there is any way that the LGPL is ok.
And a guide is needed to indicate which parts of the code are under which
licenses so it is clear to anyone who downloads the code that these other
licenses do not apply to the whole system. See
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/LICENSE for an example.
Alan.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> 13.0-incubating-rc1/src
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.
> git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
> >
> > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1009
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
> 13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc1]
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
+1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> release candidate 1. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13.0-incubating-rc1/src
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.git;a=commit;h=ae63ce233eb4b34eed03208322f17da941dee0f3
>
> The Nexus Staging URL:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1009
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>