You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de> on 2006/11/22 21:10:55 UTC
Tagging plans for mod_jk 1.2.20
Hi,
I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturday.
Anyone else OK with that, or are there more outstanding changes, that
should go into this release? Anything in the works concerning IIS 6?
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: mod_jk environment variable handling in Apache
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
Oups forgot to respond
The unique case where an env var could be usefull is by VirtualHost
>2006/11/23, Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > I'm doing extensive use VirtualHost and no-jk directive on our Apache
> > 2.0.x servers so I'm very carefull about any changes in these area.
>
> There is one strange thing concerning apache and JkEnvVar. The mod_jk
> code handles them, as if it would make sense to have the same env var
> multiple times, with different default values. More precisely it uses
> "add table" instead of "set table" when JkEnvVar is being processed (so
> appending duplicates) and it also uses overlay tables to merge between
> base and vhost, which again appends all the base values to the vhost.
>
> This doesn't seem to make sense, because a servlet request attribute can
> only have one value.
>
> I would like to clean that up, so that later calls to JkEnvVar for the
> same variable overwrites earlier ones (using set table instead of add
> table), and all calls in vhost overwrite the ones in base (merging more
> carefully than table overlay does).
>
> Do you know any use case, where the current behaviour makes sense?
>
> I expect, that nobody really cared, because a config where the same env
> var is used with multiple default values doesn't really look reasonable.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
mod_jk environment variable handling in Apache
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Henri Gomez wrote:
> I'm doing extensive use VirtualHost and no-jk directive on our Apache
> 2.0.x servers so I'm very carefull about any changes in these area.
There is one strange thing concerning apache and JkEnvVar. The mod_jk
code handles them, as if it would make sense to have the same env var
multiple times, with different default values. More precisely it uses
"add table" instead of "set table" when JkEnvVar is being processed (so
appending duplicates) and it also uses overlay tables to merge between
base and vhost, which again appends all the base values to the vhost.
This doesn't seem to make sense, because a servlet request attribute can
only have one value.
I would like to clean that up, so that later calls to JkEnvVar for the
same variable overwrites earlier ones (using set table instead of add
table), and all calls in vhost overwrite the ones in base (merging more
carefully than table overlay does).
Do you know any use case, where the current behaviour makes sense?
I expect, that nobody really cared, because a config where the same env
var is used with multiple default values doesn't really look reasonable.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tagging plans for mod_jk 1.2.20
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I'll check these doc when available.
I'm doing extensive use VirtualHost and no-jk directive on our Apache
2.0.x servers so I'm very carefull about any changes in these area.
Thanks
2006/11/23, Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Did you update the documentation concerning 'apache integrations' ?
>
> I'm in the middle of doing it. I added information about vhost support
> to the main table of apache configs (not yet committed) and I'll add a
> new page concerning uri mapping (mainly uriworkermap.properties) on the
> copnfig dir adding to workers.properties, Apache and IIS a fourth menu item.
>
> > Regards
> >
> > 2006/11/23, Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>:
> >> Mladen Turk schrieb:
> >> > Rainer Jung wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
> >> >> additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
> >> >> apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
> >> >> me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturday.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > OK. Although I have to double check your changes to the
> >> > first retry handling ;)
> >>
> >> Great, just let me know if you think we need more time. We don't want to
> >> break it because of a couple of days more time.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tagging plans for mod_jk 1.2.20
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Did you update the documentation concerning 'apache integrations' ?
I'm in the middle of doing it. I added information about vhost support
to the main table of apache configs (not yet committed) and I'll add a
new page concerning uri mapping (mainly uriworkermap.properties) on the
copnfig dir adding to workers.properties, Apache and IIS a fourth menu item.
> Regards
>
> 2006/11/23, Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>:
>> Mladen Turk schrieb:
>> > Rainer Jung wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
>> >> additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
>> >> apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
>> >> me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturday.
>> >>
>> >
>> > OK. Although I have to double check your changes to the
>> > first retry handling ;)
>>
>> Great, just let me know if you think we need more time. We don't want to
>> break it because of a couple of days more time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tagging plans for mod_jk 1.2.20
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
Did you update the documentation concerning 'apache integrations' ?
Regards
2006/11/23, Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>:
> Mladen Turk schrieb:
> > Rainer Jung wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
> >> additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
> >> apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
> >> me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturday.
> >>
> >
> > OK. Although I have to double check your changes to the
> > first retry handling ;)
>
> Great, just let me know if you think we need more time. We don't want to
> break it because of a couple of days more time.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tagging plans for mod_jk 1.2.20
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Mladen Turk schrieb:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
>> additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
>> apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
>> me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturday.
>>
>
> OK. Although I have to double check your changes to the
> first retry handling ;)
Great, just let me know if you think we need more time. We don't want to
break it because of a couple of days more time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tagging plans for mod_jk 1.2.20
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
> additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
> apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
> me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturday.
>
OK. Although I have to double check your changes to the
first retry handling ;)
I'm just leaving Berlin, so not before tomorrow.
> Anyone else OK with that, or are there more outstanding changes, that
> should go into this release? Anything in the works concerning IIS 6?
>
IIS6 should be fine now. Tested that last week with multiple
workers and recycling.
Regards,
Mladen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org