You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net> on 2004/05/05 21:05:45 UTC

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

jorton@apache.org wrote:
> jorton      2004/05/05 09:29:59

>   Index: STATUS

>        *) Readd suexec setuid and user check (now APR supports it)
>             os/unix/unixd.c: r1.69
>           +1: nd, trawick
>   +       +1: jorton, if surrounded with #ifdef APR_USETID to retain
>   +           compatibility with APR <0.9.5

why the compatibility restriction?

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:05:45PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > jorton@apache.org wrote:
> > >jorton      2004/05/05 09:29:59
> > 
> > >  Index: STATUS
> > 
> > >       *) Readd suexec setuid and user check (now APR supports it)
> > >            os/unix/unixd.c: r1.69
> > >          +1: nd, trawick
> > >  +       +1: jorton, if surrounded with #ifdef APR_USETID to retain
> > >  +           compatibility with APR <0.9.5
> > 
> > why the compatibility restriction?
> 
> APR 0.9.4 is the latest released version of APR, and it's desirable that
> the 2.0 branch is always usable with a released version of APR.

Just for the records: I agree with this argumentation :-)

nd

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

Posted by Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>.
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:05:45PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> jorton@apache.org wrote:
> >jorton      2004/05/05 09:29:59
> 
> >  Index: STATUS
> 
> >       *) Readd suexec setuid and user check (now APR supports it)
> >            os/unix/unixd.c: r1.69
> >          +1: nd, trawick
> >  +       +1: jorton, if surrounded with #ifdef APR_USETID to retain
> >  +           compatibility with APR <0.9.5
> 
> why the compatibility restriction?

APR 0.9.4 is the latest released version of APR, and it's desirable that
the 2.0 branch is always usable with a released version of APR.

joe