You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pirk.apache.org by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> on 2017/03/22 21:06:12 UTC
[VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
before we bring this to the IPMC.
+1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
-1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
- Josh
[1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Yes, time to close the vote.
Tim
On 06/04/17 18:52, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> There hasn't been any activity for the last week and a half - would suggest
> that we close the vote.
>
> Mentors - Are we ready to call the vote?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ellison Anne
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> No rush on my part...
>>
>>
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>
>>> Josh,
>>>
>>> I assume there is no rush to complete this decision. If we could keep
>>> the vote open for a few days longer that would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On 22/03/17 21:06, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
>>>> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>>>>
>>>> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
>>>> before we bring this to the IPMC.
>>>>
>>>> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
>>>> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>>>>
>>>> - Josh
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Ellison Anne Williams <ea...@apache.org>.
Hi Guys,
There hasn't been any activity for the last week and a half - would suggest
that we close the vote.
Mentors - Are we ready to call the vote?
Thanks,
Ellison Anne
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> No rush on my part...
>
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>> Josh,
>>
>> I assume there is no rush to complete this decision. If we could keep
>> the vote open for a few days longer that would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>> On 22/03/17 21:06, Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
>>> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>>>
>>> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
>>> before we bring this to the IPMC.
>>>
>>> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
>>> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>>>
>>> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
No rush on my part...
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Josh,
>
> I assume there is no rush to complete this decision. If we could keep
> the vote open for a few days longer that would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> On 22/03/17 21:06, Josh Elser wrote:
>> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
>> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>>
>> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
>> before we bring this to the IPMC.
>>
>> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
>> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>>
>> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Josh,
I assume there is no rush to complete this decision. If we could keep
the vote open for a few days longer that would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Tim
On 22/03/17 21:06, Josh Elser wrote:
> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>
> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
> before we bring this to the IPMC.
>
> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>
> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Joe Witt <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1. It appears prudent given the drop in momentum though the initial
growth and efforts were highly encouraging.
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>
> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement before
> we bring this to the IPMC.
>
> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>
> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
I was recently reading this article about using Homomorphic Encryption for
encrypted Deep Learning and building safe A.I. -
https://iamtrask.github.io/2017/03/17/safe-ai/
and Pirk with Pallier Encryption was the first thing that came to mind; and
the high relevance of Pirk as AI becomes more commonplace.
A very reluctant +1 (maybe :-) )
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 Alas, poor Pirk, we hardy knew ye!
>
> Tim
>
> On 22/03/17 21:06, Josh Elser wrote:
> > It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
> > time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
> >
> > As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
> > before we bring this to the IPMC.
> >
> > +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
> > -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
> >
> > This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> > [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
>
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
+1 Alas, poor Pirk, we hardy knew ye!
Tim
On 22/03/17 21:06, Josh Elser wrote:
> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>
> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
> before we bring this to the IPMC.
>
> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>
> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Jacob Wilder <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1, with a heavy heart
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 21:03 Walter Ray-Dulany <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 If (when, really) I have cycles again, this would be fun.
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
> eawilliams@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 - It's my hope that we have cycles to bring it out of retirement at
> some
> > point
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > (forgot to include my) +1
> > >
> > >
> > > Josh Elser wrote:
> > >
> > >> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
> > >> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
> > >>
> > >> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
> > >> before we bring this to the IPMC.
> > >>
> > >> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
> > >> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
> > >>
> > >> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
> > >>
> > >> - Josh
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
--
—
Jacob Wilder
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Walter Ray-Dulany <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1 If (when, really) I have cycles again, this would be fun.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliams@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 - It's my hope that we have cycles to bring it out of retirement at some
> point
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > (forgot to include my) +1
> >
> >
> > Josh Elser wrote:
> >
> >> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
> >> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
> >>
> >> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
> >> before we bring this to the IPMC.
> >>
> >> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
> >> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
> >>
> >> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
> >>
> >> - Josh
> >>
> >> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Ellison Anne Williams <ea...@apache.org>.
+1 - It's my hope that we have cycles to bring it out of retirement at some
point
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> (forgot to include my) +1
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>
>> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
>> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>>
>> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
>> before we bring this to the IPMC.
>>
>> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
>> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>>
>> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Pirk (incubating)
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
(forgot to include my) +1
Josh Elser wrote:
> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with
> time/ability/interest to continue the podling.
>
> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement
> before we bring this to the IPMC.
>
> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling
> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because...
>
> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT)
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html