svn commit: r1445035 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

[wr...@apache.org]

Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Feb 12 05:17:06 2013
New Revision: 1445035

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1445035
Log:
Propose a cgi-examples/ compromise?

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1445035&r1=1445034&r2=1445035&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Feb 12 05:17:06 2013
@@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
           existing ones and I'll be satisified that enough people
           considered this addition as an appropriate solution for a
           real httpd usability problem.)
+     wrowe: I'd agree with trawick, and suggest that these scripts can begin
+            their life somewhere in the manual/ tree.  This really seems like
+            the place where /usr/share/httpd/examples/ would be useful, but
+            there isn't an ordinary directory for that.  Since we want none
+            of the scripts to function 'out of the box', what about a new
+            cgi-examples/ dir alongside cgi-bin/? Otherwise manual/cgi/examples
+            might work?
 
    * mod_proxy: Allow balancers to be server-specific, as they should have
      been. Inheritance causes too many behind-the-scene interactions