You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by "KARR, DAVID (ATTSI)" <dk...@att.com> on 2010/11/18 17:53:36 UTC
JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS?
I've been working on separate efforts using CXF, one using JAX-RS in
WebLogic 10.3.3, and one using JAX-WS in WebLogic 10MP1. I've had no
real trouble with the first effort, but I've effectively given up on the
second effort.
The JAX-WS implementation in WebLogic 10MP1 fails because of classloader
problems with the Stax API. I've followed all the advice on solving
this problem, but it just doesn't work in WL 10MP1. It's possible these
problems were fixed in WL 10.3.3 because I read about some people
implementing particular solutions and having it work, but only in
10.3.3.
After I reached this conclusion with the JAX-WS implementation, I
wondered why I wasn't having trouble with the JAX-RS implementation. It
could very well be because I'm using WebLogic 10.3.3, but I also noticed
that the resulting set of libraries for the JAX-RS implementation has
the "geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar", but not the Woodstox jar (I
only added jars that resolved issues in my implementation). Does this
mean that the JAX-RS implementation doesn't use the Stax API?
Re: JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday 18 November 2010 4:04:02 pm KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:55 PM
> > To: users@cxf.apache.org
> > Cc: KARR, DAVID (ATTSI)
> > Subject: Re: JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS?
> >
> > On Thursday 18 November 2010 11:53:36 am KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) wrote:
> > > I've been working on separate efforts using CXF, one using JAX-RS in
> > > WebLogic 10.3.3, and one using JAX-WS in WebLogic 10MP1. I've had
>
> no
>
> > > real trouble with the first effort, but I've effectively given up on
> >
> > the
> >
> > > second effort.
> > >
> > > The JAX-WS implementation in WebLogic 10MP1 fails because of
> >
> > classloader
> >
> > > problems with the Stax API. I've followed all the advice on solving
> > > this problem, but it just doesn't work in WL 10MP1. It's possible
> >
> > these
> >
> > > problems were fixed in WL 10.3.3 because I read about some people
> > > implementing particular solutions and having it work, but only in
> > > 10.3.3.
> > >
> > > After I reached this conclusion with the JAX-WS implementation, I
> > > wondered why I wasn't having trouble with the JAX-RS implementation.
> >
> > It
> >
> > > could very well be because I'm using WebLogic 10.3.3, but I also
> >
> > noticed
> >
> > > that the resulting set of libraries for the JAX-RS implementation
>
> has
>
> > > the "geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar", but not the Woodstox jar
> >
> > (I
> >
> > > only added jars that resolved issues in my implementation). Does
> >
> > this
> >
> > > mean that the JAX-RS implementation doesn't use the Stax API?
> >
> > On any Java6 implementation, you likely don't need the stax-api jar at
> > all.
> > Likely, WL already has it as well. Thus, I'd just remove it in both
> > cases.
>
> Good to know, but WebLogic 10MP1 uses JDK 1.5, believe it or not.
Right, but if you are having classloader issues with stax-api, then it likely
has stax-api already built into it's classloaders. Thus, you wouldn't need
ours. I assume.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
RE: JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS?
Posted by "KARR, DAVID (ATTSI)" <dk...@att.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:55 PM
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Cc: KARR, DAVID (ATTSI)
> Subject: Re: JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS?
>
> On Thursday 18 November 2010 11:53:36 am KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) wrote:
> > I've been working on separate efforts using CXF, one using JAX-RS in
> > WebLogic 10.3.3, and one using JAX-WS in WebLogic 10MP1. I've had
no
> > real trouble with the first effort, but I've effectively given up on
> the
> > second effort.
> >
> > The JAX-WS implementation in WebLogic 10MP1 fails because of
> classloader
> > problems with the Stax API. I've followed all the advice on solving
> > this problem, but it just doesn't work in WL 10MP1. It's possible
> these
> > problems were fixed in WL 10.3.3 because I read about some people
> > implementing particular solutions and having it work, but only in
> > 10.3.3.
> >
> > After I reached this conclusion with the JAX-WS implementation, I
> > wondered why I wasn't having trouble with the JAX-RS implementation.
> It
> > could very well be because I'm using WebLogic 10.3.3, but I also
> noticed
> > that the resulting set of libraries for the JAX-RS implementation
has
> > the "geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar", but not the Woodstox jar
> (I
> > only added jars that resolved issues in my implementation). Does
> this
> > mean that the JAX-RS implementation doesn't use the Stax API?
>
> On any Java6 implementation, you likely don't need the stax-api jar at
> all.
> Likely, WL already has it as well. Thus, I'd just remove it in both
> cases.
Good to know, but WebLogic 10MP1 uses JDK 1.5, believe it or not.
Re: JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday 18 November 2010 11:53:36 am KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) wrote:
> I've been working on separate efforts using CXF, one using JAX-RS in
> WebLogic 10.3.3, and one using JAX-WS in WebLogic 10MP1. I've had no
> real trouble with the first effort, but I've effectively given up on the
> second effort.
>
> The JAX-WS implementation in WebLogic 10MP1 fails because of classloader
> problems with the Stax API. I've followed all the advice on solving
> this problem, but it just doesn't work in WL 10MP1. It's possible these
> problems were fixed in WL 10.3.3 because I read about some people
> implementing particular solutions and having it work, but only in
> 10.3.3.
>
> After I reached this conclusion with the JAX-WS implementation, I
> wondered why I wasn't having trouble with the JAX-RS implementation. It
> could very well be because I'm using WebLogic 10.3.3, but I also noticed
> that the resulting set of libraries for the JAX-RS implementation has
> the "geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar", but not the Woodstox jar (I
> only added jars that resolved issues in my implementation). Does this
> mean that the JAX-RS implementation doesn't use the Stax API?
On any Java6 implementation, you likely don't need the stax-api jar at all.
Likely, WL already has it as well. Thus, I'd just remove it in both cases.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Re: JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS?
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>.
Hi David
JAX-RS implementation can be configured to use but does not use it by
default.
For example, if JAX-RS JAXBElementProvider detects that an
XMLStreamReader/Writer Factory is available on the message then it will be
used to read from/write to the stream. One concrete example is the fast
infoset support, with the fastinfoset CXF interceptors dealing with stax
factories and with JAXBProvider using the same factories
cheers, Sergey
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) <dk...@att.com> wrote:
> I've been working on separate efforts using CXF, one using JAX-RS in
> WebLogic 10.3.3, and one using JAX-WS in WebLogic 10MP1. I've had no
> real trouble with the first effort, but I've effectively given up on the
> second effort.
>
> The JAX-WS implementation in WebLogic 10MP1 fails because of classloader
> problems with the Stax API. I've followed all the advice on solving
> this problem, but it just doesn't work in WL 10MP1. It's possible these
> problems were fixed in WL 10.3.3 because I read about some people
> implementing particular solutions and having it work, but only in
> 10.3.3.
>
> After I reached this conclusion with the JAX-WS implementation, I
> wondered why I wasn't having trouble with the JAX-RS implementation. It
> could very well be because I'm using WebLogic 10.3.3, but I also noticed
> that the resulting set of libraries for the JAX-RS implementation has
> the "geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar", but not the Woodstox jar (I
> only added jars that resolved issues in my implementation). Does this
> mean that the JAX-RS implementation doesn't use the Stax API?
>