You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/07/16 22:47:39 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow-site] potiuk opened a new pull request, #639: Unprotect main branch in aurflow-site

potiuk opened a new pull request, #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/639

   We pretty much never are able to review airflow-sites changes anyway
   and we do not need to protect the branch as we do not release
   software from it - just produce documentation


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [airflow-site] ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #639: Unprotect main branch in airflow-site

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ephraimbuddy commented on PR #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/639#issuecomment-1186818723

   Won't this make it possible for someone to push a commit directly to main without making a pull request? If it will, I would suggest still protecting main because I have occasionally iterated changes on a repo main and tried pushing only to realize that I'm on main. Some other persons may also be facing this issue


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [airflow-site] potiuk commented on pull request #639: Change protection rules for airflow-site repository

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on PR #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/639#issuecomment-1186993306

   I updated subject and description of the commit/PR to reflect that.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [airflow-site] potiuk merged pull request #639: Change protection rules for airflow-site repository

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk merged PR #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/639


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [airflow-site] potiuk commented on pull request #639: Change protection rules for airflow-site repository

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on PR #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/639#issuecomment-1186993695

   BTW. you can read more about asf.yaml at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-Branchprotection


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [airflow-site] potiuk commented on pull request #639: Change protection rules for airflow-site repository

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on PR #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/639#issuecomment-1186992309

   > Won't this make it possible for someone to push a commit directly to main without making a pull request? If it will, I would suggest still protecting main because I have occasionally iterated changes on a repo main and tried pushing only to realize that I'm on main. Some other persons may also be facing this issue
   
   Yep. you are absolutely right.
   
   I changed it now, to still require a PR and status checks to pass, but no longer require an approval.
   
   This is - I think - the best approach. We won't be able to force-push to master, we will always have to go through PR which will have to pass all the checks (I.e. the site shoudl build), and the PR will have to be based on latest `main` - keeping linear history and forcing the contributor to rebase before merge.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org