You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@nuttx.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/04/01 03:18:48 UTC
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] Donny9 opened a new pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Donny9 opened a new pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925
## Summary
sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Signed-off-by: Jiuzhu Dong <do...@xiaomi.com>
## Impact
## Testing
Ci test
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085671211
>@masayuki2009 I just looked at our pipelines, all the ESP32 configs are passing.
How about the performance of the smp application with esp32-devkitc:smp on QEMU?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] Donny9 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Donny9 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085516053
>
too slow ? busy loop because this pr ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085520139
>too slow ? busy loop because this pr ?
@Donny9
Yes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] Donny9 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Donny9 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085526980
> > too slow ? busy loop because this pr ?
>
> @Donny9 Yes.
It looks very unlikely, nxsig_alloc_actionblock will alloc four new sigactq_t every time.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085731051
>I just tried locally as well. I didn't notice any performance issues. Is it timing out for your test?
@Ouss4
Thanks for your comments.
It seems that something is wrong with my environment.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] Ouss4 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Ouss4 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085683656
I just tried locally as well. I didn't notice any performance issues. Is it timing out for your test?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085513376
@Donny9
I noticed that my automatic test failed because the smp application with esp32-devkitc:smp (QEMU) runs too slow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085638537
> I noticed that my automatic test failed because the smp application with esp32-devkitc:smp (QEMU) runs too slow.
@Ouss4
Can you try the latest master and confirm if the above issue happens on esp32-qemu?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] Ouss4 commented on pull request #5925: sigact: get free sigact from freelist always successful
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Ouss4 commented on pull request #5925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5925#issuecomment-1085665524
@masayuki2009 I just looked at our pipelines, all the ESP32 configs are passing.
(in somewhat unrelated note, ESP32-C3 is failing, all the new RISC-V changes must have broken something. We are getting `up_assert: Assertion failed at file:common/riscv_exception.c line: 8`)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org