[vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

[scott comer <we...@mac.com>]

currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a 
fix for
this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so long ago,
what do you say for putting it in 1.1?

it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and
built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.

i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the issue)
if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might be rick.

+1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)

scott out

Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

[James Dixson <di...@gmail.com>]

+1 from me too.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Gaurav Sandhir (gsandhir)
<gs...@cisco.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manoj Ganesan [mailto:manoj.ganesan@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:05 PM
> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1
>
> + 1 for the inclusion.
> Manoj.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM, scott comer <we...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> ok, folks, i need some votes to proceed...
>>
>> scott out
>>
>>
>> scott comer wrote:
>>
>>> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a
>
>>> fix for this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so
>>> long ago, what do you say for putting it in 1.1?
>>>
>>> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and
>
>>> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.
>>>
>>> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the
>>> issue) if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might
> be rick.
>>>
>>> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)
>>>
>>> scott out
>>>
>>>
>>
>

RE: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

["Gaurav Sandhir (gsandhir)" <gs...@cisco.com>]

+1 

-----Original Message-----
From: Manoj Ganesan [mailto:manoj.ganesan@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:05 PM
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

+ 1 for the inclusion.
Manoj.


On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM, scott comer <we...@mac.com> wrote:

> ok, folks, i need some votes to proceed...
>
> scott out
>
>
> scott comer wrote:
>
>> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a

>> fix for this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so 
>> long ago, what do you say for putting it in 1.1?
>>
>> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and

>> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.
>>
>> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the 
>> issue) if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might
be rick.
>>
>> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)
>>
>> scott out
>>
>>
>

Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

[Manoj Ganesan <ma...@gmail.com>]

+ 1 for the inclusion.
Manoj.


On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM, scott comer <we...@mac.com> wrote:

> ok, folks, i need some votes to proceed...
>
> scott out
>
>
> scott comer wrote:
>
>> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a fix
>> for
>> this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so long ago,
>> what do you say for putting it in 1.1?
>>
>> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and
>> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.
>>
>> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the issue)
>> if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might be rick.
>>
>> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)
>>
>> scott out
>>
>>
>

Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

[scott comer <we...@mac.com>]

ok, folks, i need some votes to proceed...

scott out

scott comer wrote:
> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a 
> fix for
> this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so long ago,
> what do you say for putting it in 1.1?
>
> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and
> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.
>
> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the issue)
> if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might be rick.
>
> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)
>
> scott out
>

Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

[scott comer <we...@mac.com>]

ok, thanks for voting everyone. i'm gonna move this fix into release 1.1.

scott comer wrote:
> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a 
> fix for
> this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so long ago,
> what do you say for putting it in 1.1?
>
> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and
> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.
>
> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the issue)
> if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might be rick.
>
> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)
>
> scott out
>

Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

[scott comer <we...@mac.com>]

here's the link if anyone needs it:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ETCH-69

scott comer wrote:
> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a 
> fix for
> this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so long ago,
> what do you say for putting it in 1.1?
>
> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and
> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.
>
> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the issue)
> if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might be rick.
>
> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)
>
> scott out
>