[GitHub] [pinot] somandal commented on issue #10318: [multistage] Return type for AVG() aggregation function

["somandal (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

somandal commented on issue #10318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/10318#issuecomment-1447137611

   +1 for PostgreSQL behavior if possible. @vvivekiyer any luck in figuring out how "numeric" in PostgreSQL maps to Pinot data types?
   
   Also one more concern that came up was that the default behavior of AVG() in v1 engine will differ in v2 engine if we take a different approach. Will that be acceptable? This is a behavior change which will need to be called out for customers.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@pinot.apache.org