You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> on 2008/06/06 14:55:08 UTC
Camel 1.4 release
Hi,
It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127
fixes and improvements. I believe it's time to start thinking about a
1.4 release. If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate for
us to check out. Please let us know what other issues you think
should absolutely be fixed in the 1.4 release.
Thanks
Hadrian
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
I just wanted to say that I am absolutely impressed how active camel is.
127 issues in 2 months probably makes camel one of the most active
projects out there. You guys are really doing great work.
Greetings
Christian
----
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Hadrian Zbarcea schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127
> fixes and improvements. I believe it's time to start thinking about a
> 1.4 release. If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate for
> us to check out. Please let us know what other issues you think
> should absolutely be fixed in the 1.4 release.
>
> Thanks
> Hadrian
>
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sure - lets build an RC! :)
I've just fixed up missing spring jars in the assembly. An RC always
helps flesh out those little issues you forget about until a release
comes along :)
2008/6/6 Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127 fixes and
> improvements. I believe it's time to start thinking about a 1.4 release.
> If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate for us to check out.
> Please let us know what other issues you think should absolutely be fixed
> in the 1.4 release.
>
> Thanks
> Hadrian
>
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Agreed, once the JMX stuff is sorted, lets get 1.4 out!
2008/6/17 Claus Ibsen <ci...@silverbullet.dk>:
> Hi
>
> I have been closing or rescheduling some 1.4 issues to 1.5
> We should start to get the last stuff fixed so we could cut another RC.
>
> Would be cool to get a final out before the summer break.
> Hadrian must have time for his bikes in the mountains or stuff he likes that doesn't involves a computer.
>
> So please update the issues in JIRA and commit the stuff you think should be in the release.
>
> I do think we could postpone the intercept() suff for 1.5. We got the most blockers fixed with the latest OSGi fixes from our friends at ServiceMix (thanks Freemand and Guillaume).
>
> Only outstanding is some JMX related stuff.
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]
> Sent: 9. juni 2008 18:24
> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Camel 1.4 release
>
> 2008/6/6 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>:
>> I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing. This is
>> about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
>> I'll try to have a look next week.
>
> Agreed - it'd be good to have this fixed. There's a JIRA already...
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-558
>
> I was wondering if there was some neat way we could patch the
> FactoryFinder stuff to work nicely in OSGI as there's a few things we
> use that for (type converters and so forth). If noone beats me to it
> I'll try take a look tomorrow
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://open.iona.com
>
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by William Tam <em...@gmail.com>.
I am getting close to have the JMX stuff patched.
- William
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Claus Ibsen <ci...@silverbullet.dk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been closing or rescheduling some 1.4 issues to 1.5
> We should start to get the last stuff fixed so we could cut another RC.
>
> Would be cool to get a final out before the summer break.
> Hadrian must have time for his bikes in the mountains or stuff he likes that doesn't involves a computer.
>
> So please update the issues in JIRA and commit the stuff you think should be in the release.
>
> I do think we could postpone the intercept() suff for 1.5. We got the most blockers fixed with the latest OSGi fixes from our friends at ServiceMix (thanks Freemand and Guillaume).
>
> Only outstanding is some JMX related stuff.
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]
> Sent: 9. juni 2008 18:24
> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Camel 1.4 release
>
> 2008/6/6 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>:
>> I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing. This is
>> about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
>> I'll try to have a look next week.
>
> Agreed - it'd be good to have this fixed. There's a JIRA already...
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-558
>
> I was wondering if there was some neat way we could patch the
> FactoryFinder stuff to work nicely in OSGI as there's a few things we
> use that for (type converters and so forth). If noone beats me to it
> I'll try take a look tomorrow
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://open.iona.com
>
RE: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by Claus Ibsen <ci...@silverbullet.dk>.
Hi
I have been closing or rescheduling some 1.4 issues to 1.5
We should start to get the last stuff fixed so we could cut another RC.
Would be cool to get a final out before the summer break.
Hadrian must have time for his bikes in the mountains or stuff he likes that doesn't involves a computer.
So please update the issues in JIRA and commit the stuff you think should be in the release.
I do think we could postpone the intercept() suff for 1.5. We got the most blockers fixed with the latest OSGi fixes from our friends at ServiceMix (thanks Freemand and Guillaume).
Only outstanding is some JMX related stuff.
Med venlig hilsen
Claus Ibsen
......................................
Silverbullet
Skovsgårdsvænget 21
8362 Hørning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk
-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]
Sent: 9. juni 2008 18:24
To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Camel 1.4 release
2008/6/6 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>:
> I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing. This is
> about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
> I'll try to have a look next week.
Agreed - it'd be good to have this fixed. There's a JIRA already...
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-558
I was wondering if there was some neat way we could patch the
FactoryFinder stuff to work nicely in OSGI as there's a few things we
use that for (type converters and so forth). If noone beats me to it
I'll try take a look tomorrow
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
2008/6/6 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>:
> I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing. This is
> about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
> I'll try to have a look next week.
Agreed - it'd be good to have this fixed. There's a JIRA already...
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-558
I was wondering if there was some neat way we could patch the
FactoryFinder stuff to work nicely in OSGI as there's a few things we
use that for (type converters and so forth). If noone beats me to it
I'll try take a look tomorrow
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I just checked the kit, we do not include the camel-spring-integration
and camel-scala into the java bin release kits.
I will commit a patch for it.
Willem.
Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find a first release candidate of apache-camel-1.4.0 here:
> http://people.apache.org/~hadrian/apache-camel-1.4.0-RC1/maven2/
>
> Most notable are the new Spring Integration support, improvements in
> camel-scala and other components, architecture cleanup and quite a few
> bug fixes. Many thanks to Claus for starting a release note draft
> here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+1.4.0+Release.
>
> Please play with it and let's close down any issues we may spot. If
> you know of issues that you thing must go in this release please let
> us know (thanks to those who did that already). I hope will be able
> to do a final release this month.
>
> Cheers
> Hadrian
>
> PS. I'll be out in the mountains for a week, not sure if i'll have
> connectivity over there.
>
>
> On Jun 6, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing. This is
>> about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
>> I'll try to have a look next week.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Claus Ibsen <ci...@silverbullet.dk> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Yep would be great with a 1.4 release before the summer or at least
>>> one on the way.
>>>
>>> We should rather release often than only 1 or 2 pr. year. At least
>>> now that some many activates is happening around Camel and we
>>> add/fix quite a lot of stuff - even though the roadmap is a bit fuzzy.
>>>
>>> Move tickets
>>> ============
>>> I would suggest that we should start moving issues to 1.5/2.0 so the
>>> roadmap for 1.4 is manageable to fix in a short time.
>>>
>>> I would like to give it a go, and move bigger issues for 2.0, such
>>> as the new DSL languages and other more exotic features - please
>>> feel free to move issues as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Must have
>>> ==========
>>> The must have features is for my point of view that we gave the
>>> "interceptor" issue a go. Hadrian you have a few tickets on this.
>>> Anything I can help with? In special cases you end up with
>>> duplicated messages and this is a blocker issue.
>>>
>>> And then we have the issues with resource/classloading in OSGi
>>> environments. Freeman Fang would try to provide a patch. Anyone can
>>> help him? Maybe more of the good people from ServiceMix?
>>>
>>> And we have one unit test failing on ActiveMQ 5.1.0 that worked in
>>> 5.0.0 - its some of the advanced stuff we got some patches for
>>> recently.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Med venlig hilsen
>>>
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> ......................................
>>> Silverbullet
>>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>>> 8362 Hørning
>>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbarcea@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 6. juni 2008 14:55
>>> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
>>> Subject: Camel 1.4 release
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127
>>> fixes and improvements. I believe it's time to start thinking about a
>>> 1.4 release. If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate for
>>> us to check out. Please let us know what other issues you think
>>> should absolutely be fixed in the 1.4 release.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Please find a first release candidate of apache-camel-1.4.0 here:
http://people.apache.org/~hadrian/apache-camel-1.4.0-RC1/maven2/
Most notable are the new Spring Integration support, improvements in
camel-scala and other components, architecture cleanup and quite a few
bug fixes. Many thanks to Claus for starting a release note draft
here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+1.4.0+Release
.
Please play with it and let's close down any issues we may spot. If
you know of issues that you thing must go in this release please let
us know (thanks to those who did that already). I hope will be able
to do a final release this month.
Cheers
Hadrian
PS. I'll be out in the mountains for a week, not sure if i'll have
connectivity over there.
On Jun 6, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing. This is
> about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
> I'll try to have a look next week.
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Claus Ibsen <ci...@silverbullet.dk>
> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Yep would be great with a 1.4 release before the summer or at least
>> one on the way.
>>
>> We should rather release often than only 1 or 2 pr. year. At least
>> now that some many activates is happening around Camel and we add/
>> fix quite a lot of stuff - even though the roadmap is a bit fuzzy.
>>
>> Move tickets
>> ============
>> I would suggest that we should start moving issues to 1.5/2.0 so
>> the roadmap for 1.4 is manageable to fix in a short time.
>>
>> I would like to give it a go, and move bigger issues for 2.0, such
>> as the new DSL languages and other more exotic features - please
>> feel free to move issues as well.
>>
>>
>> Must have
>> ==========
>> The must have features is for my point of view that we gave the
>> "interceptor" issue a go. Hadrian you have a few tickets on this.
>> Anything I can help with? In special cases you end up with
>> duplicated messages and this is a blocker issue.
>>
>> And then we have the issues with resource/classloading in OSGi
>> environments. Freeman Fang would try to provide a patch. Anyone can
>> help him? Maybe more of the good people from ServiceMix?
>>
>> And we have one unit test failing on ActiveMQ 5.1.0 that worked in
>> 5.0.0 - its some of the advanced stuff we got some patches for
>> recently.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Med venlig hilsen
>>
>> Claus Ibsen
>> ......................................
>> Silverbullet
>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>> 8362 Hørning
>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbarcea@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 6. juni 2008 14:55
>> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
>> Subject: Camel 1.4 release
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127
>> fixes and improvements. I believe it's time to start thinking
>> about a
>> 1.4 release. If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate
>> for
>> us to check out. Please let us know what other issues you think
>> should absolutely be fixed in the 1.4 release.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Hadrian
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I think there is an issue I'd like to fix before releasing. This is
about resolving transformers in the OSGi runtime.
I'll try to have a look next week.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Claus Ibsen <ci...@silverbullet.dk> wrote:
> +1
>
> Yep would be great with a 1.4 release before the summer or at least one on the way.
>
> We should rather release often than only 1 or 2 pr. year. At least now that some many activates is happening around Camel and we add/fix quite a lot of stuff - even though the roadmap is a bit fuzzy.
>
> Move tickets
> ============
> I would suggest that we should start moving issues to 1.5/2.0 so the roadmap for 1.4 is manageable to fix in a short time.
>
> I would like to give it a go, and move bigger issues for 2.0, such as the new DSL languages and other more exotic features - please feel free to move issues as well.
>
>
> Must have
> ==========
> The must have features is for my point of view that we gave the "interceptor" issue a go. Hadrian you have a few tickets on this. Anything I can help with? In special cases you end up with duplicated messages and this is a blocker issue.
>
> And then we have the issues with resource/classloading in OSGi environments. Freeman Fang would try to provide a patch. Anyone can help him? Maybe more of the good people from ServiceMix?
>
> And we have one unit test failing on ActiveMQ 5.1.0 that worked in 5.0.0 - its some of the advanced stuff we got some patches for recently.
>
>
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbarcea@gmail.com]
> Sent: 6. juni 2008 14:55
> To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Camel 1.4 release
>
> Hi,
>
> It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127
> fixes and improvements. I believe it's time to start thinking about a
> 1.4 release. If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate for
> us to check out. Please let us know what other issues you think
> should absolutely be fixed in the 1.4 release.
>
> Thanks
> Hadrian
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
RE: Camel 1.4 release
Posted by Claus Ibsen <ci...@silverbullet.dk>.
+1
Yep would be great with a 1.4 release before the summer or at least one on the way.
We should rather release often than only 1 or 2 pr. year. At least now that some many activates is happening around Camel and we add/fix quite a lot of stuff - even though the roadmap is a bit fuzzy.
Move tickets
============
I would suggest that we should start moving issues to 1.5/2.0 so the roadmap for 1.4 is manageable to fix in a short time.
I would like to give it a go, and move bigger issues for 2.0, such as the new DSL languages and other more exotic features - please feel free to move issues as well.
Must have
==========
The must have features is for my point of view that we gave the "interceptor" issue a go. Hadrian you have a few tickets on this. Anything I can help with? In special cases you end up with duplicated messages and this is a blocker issue.
And then we have the issues with resource/classloading in OSGi environments. Freeman Fang would try to provide a patch. Anyone can help him? Maybe more of the good people from ServiceMix?
And we have one unit test failing on ActiveMQ 5.1.0 that worked in 5.0.0 - its some of the advanced stuff we got some patches for recently.
Med venlig hilsen
Claus Ibsen
......................................
Silverbullet
Skovsgårdsvænget 21
8362 Hørning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk
-----Original Message-----
From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbarcea@gmail.com]
Sent: 6. juni 2008 14:55
To: camel-dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Camel 1.4 release
Hi,
It's been 2 months from our 1.3 release and since then we made 127
fixes and improvements. I believe it's time to start thinking about a
1.4 release. If you guys agree I can push out a release candidate for
us to check out. Please let us know what other issues you think
should absolutely be fixed in the 1.4 release.
Thanks
Hadrian