You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Erick Erickson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/08 04:05:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10006) Cannot do a full sync (fetchindex) if the replica can't open a searcher

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16315644#comment-16315644 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-10006:
---------------------------------------

[~ichattopadhyaya] What's the status here? Are we pushing this forward or should we put it in the unassigned queue?

> Cannot do a full sync (fetchindex) if the replica can't open a searcher
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10006
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10006
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: 5.3.1, 6.4
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>         Attachments: SOLR-10006.patch, SOLR-10006.patch, solr.log, solr.log
>
>
> Doing a full sync or fetchindex requires an open searcher and if you can't open the searcher those operations fail.
> For discussion. I've seen a situation in the field where a replica's index became corrupt. When the node was restarted, the replica tried to do a full sync but fails because the core can't open a searcher. The replica went into an endless sync/fail/sync cycle.
> I couldn't reproduce that exact scenario, but it's easy enough to get into a similar situation. Create a 2x2 collection and index some docs. Then stop one of the instances and go in and remove a couple of segments files and restart.
> The replica stays in the "down" state, fine so far.
> Manually issue a fetchindex. That fails because the replica can't open a searcher. Sure, issuing a fetchindex is abusive.... but I think it's the same underlying issue: why should we care about the state of a replica's current index when we're going to completely replace it anyway?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org