You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/08/05 23:56:44 UTC

[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-3860) Compare name-node performance when journaling is performed into local hard-drives or nfs.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Konstantin Shvachko updated HADOOP-3860:
----------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
        Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

I just committed this.
Please feel free to comment, discuss the benchmark results.

> Compare name-node performance when journaling is performed into local hard-drives or nfs.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3860
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3860
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.19.0
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
>             Fix For: 0.19.0
>
>         Attachments: NNThruputMoreOps.patch
>
>
> The goal of this issue is to measure how the name-node performance depends on where the edits log is written to.
> Three types of the journal storage should be evaluated:
> # local hard drive;
> # remote drive mounted via nfs;
> # nfs filer.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.