You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by jimsheffer <ji...@omnipilot.com> on 2005/03/11 19:27:16 UTC

Local.cf does this look right?

Hi everyone-

I've been using SpamAssassin on another mail server for about a year.
I've installed the new SpamAssassin version on naother mail server, and will
be testing this weekend.

I've got what I believe is a correct local.cf file set up, but want to make
sure with all the new syntax and everything.

Does anything here stand out as wrong?

Thanks for any help!

add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_
autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
add_header all Checker-Version SpamAssassin _VERSION_ (_SUBVERSION_) on
_HOSTNAME_
ok_language en
ok_locales all
trusted_networks xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
rbl_timeout 15
dns_available test: domain1.tld domain2.tld domain3.tld
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
auto_whitelist_factor 0.5
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 12
bayes_min_ham_num 200
bayes_min_spam_num 200
bayes_learn_during_report 1
bayes_expiry_max_db_size 150000
bayes_auto_expire 1
report_safe 0

Jim Sheffer,

OmniPilot Software            http://www.omnipilot.com
Systems Administrator         jimsheffer@omnipilot.com 



Re: Local.cf does this look right?

Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>.
At 01:27 PM 3/11/2005, jimsheffer wrote:
>Does anything here stand out as wrong?


>dns_available test: domain1.tld domain2.tld domain3.tld

I do hope that just modified the actual values and you don't literally have 
"domain1.tld" in there..


Other than that, it looks fine, but rather than ask us, why not ask 
spamassassin?
Just run:
         spamassassin --lint

If it runs quitely, you're likely OK. If it complains about a line, you 
have something to fix, and you know which line number to fix.