You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stanbol.apache.org by Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> on 2015/05/26 12:16:49 UTC
Partial Bundle Lists superseed?
Hi,
I read:
Bundle lists are superseded by Sling's new provisioning model and SlingStart
> <https://sling.apache.org/documentation/development/slingstart.html>.
> And a Maven goal for creating slingfeatures from Sling's Karaf Features
> is very specific to Sling and should be implemented thus at Sling.
>
on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2468
Is there a plan to use the new provisioning model in Stanbol?
Cheers,
Reto
Re: Partial Bundle Lists superseed?
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Reto,
Reads interesting. Using this would even allow to replace some Stanbol
modules (e.g. "enhancer/defaults/" or "entityhub/defaults"). Hope I
can find some time to test those things on a small example
best
Rupert
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read:
>
> Bundle lists are superseded by Sling's new provisioning model and SlingStart
>> <https://sling.apache.org/documentation/development/slingstart.html>.
>> And a Maven goal for creating slingfeatures from Sling's Karaf Features
>> is very specific to Sling and should be implemented thus at Sling.
>>
>
> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2468
>
> Is there a plan to use the new provisioning model in Stanbol?
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
| REDLINK.CO ..........................................................................
| http://redlink.co/