You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by David Graham <dg...@hotmail.com> on 2002/11/18 04:08:02 UTC
[VOTE] Version Numbers in TLD URIs
Currently Struts defines the TLD URIs containing version numbers like this
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html-1.1
This means that you must change the uri in every jsp when upgrading. I
propose we define the uris like:
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html
making it easier for people to upgrade to newer versions.
There's a bug report with more info here:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13574
My main goal is to get this minor issue solved and move on :-).
Dave
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [POLL] Version Numbers in TLD URIs
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
Is this a 2.3 thing?
It used to be that you would make the hard reference in the
web.xml (the location), and then use a soft URI in the pages.
People often use the location for the URI, but I've always thought
that was sloppy.
Does the "simplified" configuration mean that deveopers lose
control over versioning? (a la Microsoft and Explorer)
-Ted.
11/17/2002 10:08:02 PM, David Graham <dg...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Currently Struts defines the TLD URIs containing version numbers
like this
>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html-1.1
>
>This means that you must change the uri in every jsp when
upgrading. I
>propose we define the uris like:
>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html
>
>making it easier for people to upgrade to newer versions.
>
>There's a bug report with more info here:
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13574
>
>My main goal is to get this minor issue solved and move on :-).
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-
unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-
help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Version Numbers in TLD URIs
Posted by "Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org>.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:08:02 -0700
> From: David Graham <dg...@hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <st...@jakarta.apache.org>
> To: struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Version Numbers in TLD URIs
>
> Currently Struts defines the TLD URIs containing version numbers like this
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html-1.1
>
> This means that you must change the uri in every jsp when upgrading. I
> propose we define the uris like:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html
>
> making it easier for people to upgrade to newer versions.
>
> There's a bug report with more info here:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13574
>
> My main goal is to get this minor issue solved and move on :-).
>
I've been dithering on this one ... and, even when consulting folks who
have set up DTD URIs for other things, practice is not conclusive either
way.
I'm game for removing the version number, but primarily because I suspect
we will obsolete the libraries before we run into potential version
incompatibility issues. So you have my +1 to go ahead and change these
URIs.
> Dave
>
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>