You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@climate.apache.org by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/28 19:23:26 UTC

Roadmap for 1.1

Hi Folks,
Can we set a release roadmap for 1.1 with the aim of getting some key
metrics in and pushing another release in the short term?
I am going to focus on the issues assigned to me. That is all.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-562?jql=project%20%3D%20CLIMATE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20%3D%20lewismc%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC

Anyone else? Once we can decide on issues we can push the remaining issues
to 1.2.
Thanks
Lewis

-- 
*Lewis*

Re: Roadmap for 1.1

Posted by "Lee, Kyo (398L)" <Hu...@jpl.nasa.gov>.

I agree with that CLIMATE-611 is a critical issue.

For me, these are important issues to be addressed before releasing a new
version.

I. 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-679
: Without working examples, we should not mention statistical downscaling
capability.

II.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-680
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-681
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-682
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-683
: We still have issues on handling original climate model output using OCW
routines.

III.
CLI needs to be updated.

IV.
We do need to update the Virtual Box image with the updated OCW and some
datasets to run examples.

V. 
How can we host some model output files on JPL servers?

VI.  

Also Jinwon has been working hard with some model output for National
Climate Assessment.

We need to wait until he adds new metrics to the OCW-based RCMES and
completes tests. 

Thanks,
Kyo

On 10/1/15, 7:40 AM, "mltjoyce@gmail.com on behalf of Michael Joyce"
<mltjoyce@gmail.com on behalf of joyce@apache.org> wrote:

>Hey Lewis,
>
>There's a few things on my plate that I would like to see get addressed at
>some point soon. I think the most likely candidates for this would be
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-367
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-611
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-616
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-617
>
>That being said I'm fine with 1.1.0 being a reasonably quick release to
>address any missing functionality that people want to get in quickly.
>
>
>-- Jimmy
>
>On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>> Did anyone see this thread?
>> Is there any desire to set a roadmap?
>> I feel that this has been a major barrier for us in the past... it's
>>meant
>> that we've been very indecisive when it comes to releases. I think
>>setting
>> a roadmap would be a new chapter for us and would help obtain consensus
>>on
>> when the codebase is ready for release?
>> Any thoughts?
>> Thanks
>> Lewis
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Folks,
>> > Can we set a release roadmap for 1.1 with the aim of getting some key
>> > metrics in and pushing another release in the short term?
>> > I am going to focus on the issues assigned to me. That is all.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-562?jql=project%20%3D%20CLI
>>MATE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20%3D%20lewis
>>mc%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> >
>> > Anyone else? Once we can decide on issues we can push the remaining
>> issues
>> > to 1.2.
>> > Thanks
>> > Lewis
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Lewis*
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Lewis*
>>

Re: Roadmap for 1.1

Posted by Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>.

Hey Lewis,

There's a few things on my plate that I would like to see get addressed at
some point soon. I think the most likely candidates for this would be

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-367
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-611
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-616
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-617

That being said I'm fine with 1.1.0 being a reasonably quick release to
address any missing functionality that people want to get in quickly.


-- Jimmy

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> Did anyone see this thread?
> Is there any desire to set a roadmap?
> I feel that this has been a major barrier for us in the past... it's meant
> that we've been very indecisive when it comes to releases. I think setting
> a roadmap would be a new chapter for us and would help obtain consensus on
> when the codebase is ready for release?
> Any thoughts?
> Thanks
> Lewis
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> > Can we set a release roadmap for 1.1 with the aim of getting some key
> > metrics in and pushing another release in the short term?
> > I am going to focus on the issues assigned to me. That is all.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-562?jql=project%20%3D%20CLIMATE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20%3D%20lewismc%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >
> > Anyone else? Once we can decide on issues we can push the remaining
> issues
> > to 1.2.
> > Thanks
> > Lewis
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>

Re: Roadmap for 1.1

Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.

Hi Folks,
Did anyone see this thread?
Is there any desire to set a roadmap?
I feel that this has been a major barrier for us in the past... it's meant
that we've been very indecisive when it comes to releases. I think setting
a roadmap would be a new chapter for us and would help obtain consensus on
when the codebase is ready for release?
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Lewis

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> Can we set a release roadmap for 1.1 with the aim of getting some key
> metrics in and pushing another release in the short term?
> I am going to focus on the issues assigned to me. That is all.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-562?jql=project%20%3D%20CLIMATE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20%3D%20lewismc%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> Anyone else? Once we can decide on issues we can push the remaining issues
> to 1.2.
> Thanks
> Lewis
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>

-- 
*Lewis*