You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> on 2023/09/25 13:46:43 UTC
[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Hi dev,
This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Discuss thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
BR,
hzh
[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Posted by hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org>.
Close this vote with 3 +1(binding)
- Penghui
- Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
- Yunze
BR,
hzh
---- Replied Message ----
| From | guo jiwei<te...@apache.org> |
| Date | 10/23/2023 18:22 |
| To | <de...@pulsar.apache.org> |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level |
+1 (binding)
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yunze Xu <xy...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Yunze
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will
continue
to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved.
Due
to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding.
---- Replied Message ----
| From | Dave Fisher<wa...@apache.org> |
| Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 |
| To | dev@pulsar.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption
isolation level |
-1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is
the
proper course of action.
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi dev,
This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports
specifying
consumption isolation level
Discuss thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
BR,
hzh
Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Posted by guo jiwei <te...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yunze Xu <xy...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will
> continue
> > > to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved.
> Due
> > > to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---- Replied Message ----
> > > | From | Dave Fisher<wa...@apache.org> |
> > > | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 |
> > > | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org |
> > > | Cc | |
> > > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption
> > > isolation level |
> > > -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is
> the
> > > proper course of action.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi dev,
> > > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports
> specifying
> > > consumption isolation level
> > > > Discuss thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
> > > >
> > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
> > > >
> > > > BR,
> > > > hzh
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Posted by Yunze Xu <xy...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Yunze
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Penghui
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue
> > to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due
> > to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---- Replied Message ----
> > | From | Dave Fisher<wa...@apache.org> |
> > | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 |
> > | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org |
> > | Cc | |
> > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption
> > isolation level |
> > -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the
> > proper course of action.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> > > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi dev,
> > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying
> > consumption isolation level
> > > Discuss thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
> > >
> > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > hzh
> >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue
> to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due
> to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding.
>
>
>
> ---- Replied Message ----
> | From | Dave Fisher<wa...@apache.org> |
> | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 |
> | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org |
> | Cc | |
> | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption
> isolation level |
> -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the
> proper course of action.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi dev,
> > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying
> consumption isolation level
> > Discuss thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
> >
> > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
> >
> > BR,
> > hzh
>
[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Posted by hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org>.
Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding.
---- Replied Message ----
| From | Dave Fisher<wa...@apache.org> |
| Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 |
| To | dev@pulsar.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level |
-1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the proper course of action.
Regards,
Dave
> On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi dev,
> This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
> Discuss thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
>
> PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
>
> BR,
> hzh
Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Posted by Dave Fisher <wa...@apache.org>.
-1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the proper course of action.
Regards,
Dave
> On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi dev,
> This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
> Discuss thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
>
> PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
>
> BR,
> hzh