You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Doug Meil <do...@explorysmedical.com> on 2012/02/23 20:47:22 UTC
book -> 'ref guide' rename...
Hi folks-
Regarding the rename, the deployment of the book rename will happen by end
of day.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5465
The files on the website will still have the same names (e.g., book.html,
/book/book.html), so this is content-only at this point.
On 2/23/12 12:20 AM, "Stack" <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:14 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> Either way we need to update the book I think.
>>
>
>Its not 'the book'. Its the 'reference guide'. One if published by
>O'Reilly. The latter by our man Doug Meil.
>
>
>> As for the protobufs. This is trunk, and it looks like this is related
>>to HBASE-5394. Happens also in the non-secure branch.
>> Filed HBASE-5460. I assume we just add protobufs as jar dependency, I
>>will do that tonight.
>>
>
>Yeah, that should do it (above sounds reasonable).
>
>St.Ack
>
Re: book -> 'ref guide' rename...
Posted by Doug Meil <do...@explorysmedical.com>.
It's official.. it is now The Reference Guide.
On 2/23/12 2:47 PM, "Doug Meil" <do...@explorysmedical.com> wrote:
>
>Hi folks-
>
>Regarding the rename, the deployment of the book rename will happen by end
>of day.
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5465
>
>The files on the website will still have the same names (e.g., book.html,
>/book/book.html), so this is content-only at this point.
>
>
>
>On 2/23/12 12:20 AM, "Stack" <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:14 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>> Either way we need to update the book I think.
>>>
>>
>>Its not 'the book'. Its the 'reference guide'. One if published by
>>O'Reilly. The latter by our man Doug Meil.
>>
>>
>>> As for the protobufs. This is trunk, and it looks like this is related
>>>to HBASE-5394. Happens also in the non-secure branch.
>>> Filed HBASE-5460. I assume we just add protobufs as jar dependency, I
>>>will do that tonight.
>>>
>>
>>Yeah, that should do it (above sounds reasonable).
>>
>>St.Ack
>>
>
>
>