You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> on 2005/08/14 09:06:19 UTC
[math] Houskeeping - committers, contributors please read
Today I created a MATH_1_1 branch that should be close to taggable for
the 1.1 release. The only thing remaining is a full resolution to BZ
36105. We should make the changes for this bug there and port them to
the trunk as well. Once we have resolution to this, I will roll a
final RC and we can vote to release.
I also committed the first batch of Xiaogang Zhang's SOC contributions
to trunk. This stuff looks very good to me. Thanks, Xiaogang! More
eyeballs are always a good thing, though, so all pls review. The
analysis package is getting too large, so we should be thinking about
how to split it up. For now, I am committing the integration, and
interpolation (which I am reviewing now) from Xiaogang into the main
analysis package. An obvious breakout would be solver, integration,
interpolation. Pls weigh in with ideas. We will need to address this
soon.
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [math] Houskeeping - committers, contributors please read
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
On 8/22/05, Brent Worden <br...@worden.org> wrote:
> "Phil Steitz" <ph...@gmail.com> wrote
> > Today I created a MATH_1_1 branch that should be close to taggable for
> > the 1.1 release. The only thing remaining is a full resolution to BZ
> > 36105. We should make the changes for this bug there and port them to
> > the trunk as well. Once we have resolution to this, I will roll a
> > final RC and we can vote to release.
>
> I've made a few bug fixes to the MATH_1_1 branch. Are there any objections
> to me merging these into the trunk at this time?
Not from me. That will get the fixes into the nightlies.
Other than 36266, where the patch looks OK to me (with a doc comment
saying how we handle the cut point 0), and 36232 where the patch also
looks OK to me (I agree that with the short-circuit and underflow
comments) is there anyting else blocking 1.1 at this time? I would
like to go ahead and cut a final release candidate and get the release
out.
Phil
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [math] Houskeeping - committers, contributors please read
Posted by Brent Worden <br...@worden.org>.
"Phil Steitz" <ph...@gmail.com> wrote
> Today I created a MATH_1_1 branch that should be close to taggable for
> the 1.1 release. The only thing remaining is a full resolution to BZ
> 36105. We should make the changes for this bug there and port them to
> the trunk as well. Once we have resolution to this, I will roll a
> final RC and we can vote to release.
I've made a few bug fixes to the MATH_1_1 branch. Are there any objections
to me merging these into the trunk at this time?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [math] Houskeeping - committers, contributors please read
Posted by Brent Worden <br...@worden.org>.
"Phil Steitz" <ph...@gmail.com> wrote
> I also committed the first batch of Xiaogang Zhang's SOC contributions
> to trunk. This stuff looks very good to me. Thanks, Xiaogang! More
> eyeballs are always a good thing, though, so all pls review. The
> analysis package is getting too large, so we should be thinking about
> how to split it up. For now, I am committing the integration, and
> interpolation (which I am reviewing now) from Xiaogang into the main
> analysis package. An obvious breakout would be solver, integration,
> interpolation. Pls weigh in with ideas. We will need to address this
> soon.
The code is very acceptable.
Also, your proposed package breakout seems fine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org