You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by Pete Tyler <pe...@gmail.com> on 2011/04/06 05:06:44 UTC

Yet another Hadoop 0.20-append query ... sorry

Wow, what a shock when I starting at looking at bringing my HBase systems up
to date. Have Oracle taken over the Hadoop project? ;)

After a few attempts, I gave up trying to build hadoop-0.20-append on my MBP
and looked at the Cloudera option.

Please could someone confirm I am looking in the right place, here:

http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/3/

and help me determine which build I should take from those listed,

 hadoop-0.20.2+228/                    22-Feb-2011 01:18    -   
 hadoop-0.20.2+320/                    22-Feb-2011 01:20    -   
 hadoop-0.20.2+737/                    22-Feb-2011 01:21    -   
 hadoop-0.20.2-CDH3B4/               21-Feb-2011 19:55    - 

Is it as simple as taking the one with the latest timestamp or is there some
magic associated with the one named 'CDH3B4' that makes it more appealing
than the other three?

Many thanks,
Pete
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Yet-another-Hadoop-0.20-append-query-...-sorry-tp31329123p31329123.html
Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Yet another Hadoop 0.20-append query ... sorry

Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Hi Pete,

Go for CDH3B4 - it's the newest of the ones you've listed. Sorry that our
tarball archive is not well organized.

-Todd

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Pete Tyler <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Wow, what a shock when I starting at looking at bringing my HBase systems
> up
> to date. Have Oracle taken over the Hadoop project? ;)
>
> After a few attempts, I gave up trying to build hadoop-0.20-append on my
> MBP
> and looked at the Cloudera option.
>
> Please could someone confirm I am looking in the right place, here:
>
> http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/3/
>
> and help me determine which build I should take from those listed,
>
>  hadoop-0.20.2+228/                    22-Feb-2011 01:18    -
>  hadoop-0.20.2+320/                    22-Feb-2011 01:20    -
>  hadoop-0.20.2+737/                    22-Feb-2011 01:21    -
>  hadoop-0.20.2-CDH3B4/               21-Feb-2011 19:55    -
>
> Is it as simple as taking the one with the latest timestamp or is there
> some
> magic associated with the one named 'CDH3B4' that makes it more appealing
> than the other three?
>
> Many thanks,
> Pete
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Yet-another-Hadoop-0.20-append-query-...-sorry-tp31329123p31329123.html
> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Yet another Hadoop 0.20-append query ... sorry

Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Pete Tyler <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wow, what a shock when I starting at looking at bringing my HBase systems up
> to date. Have Oracle taken over the Hadoop project? ;)
>

Thats funny.


> After a few attempts, I gave up trying to build hadoop-0.20-append on my MBP
> and looked at the Cloudera option.
>

Not so funny.

Anything we can do here to help or failing that, let us know if you
run into any issue upgrading.  You saw this:
http://hbase.apache.org/book/upgrading.html

Sorry about the mess.
St.Ack