You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@crunch.apache.org by Micah Whitacre <mk...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/24 22:37:29 UTC
Crunch 0.7 Expected Release?
Is there a documented release plan for the upcoming 0.7 version of Crunch?
Or an expected date?
There are a few fixes that have been resolved (CRUNCH-217) specifically
that I know would be useful to have released.
Micah
Re: Crunch 0.7 Expected Release?
Posted by Josh Wills <jw...@cloudera.com>.
Filed CRUNCH-244 and wrote a patch for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-244
Seems like this should be the last thing to go in before we start on the
0.7.0 release.
J
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Matthias Friedrich <ma...@mafr.de> wrote:
> Thanks! MRunit is another example. It looks like we have to take
> special care of the release assemblies, but other than that I don't
> see anything out of the ordinary.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Victor Iacoban wrote:
> > Avro is doing this for avro-mapred, might use as a reference
> >
> > --victor
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Matthias Friedrich <ma...@mafr.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I don't think Maven allows you to create both hadoop1 and hadoop2
> > > artifacts from the same execution. And we obviously can't just rename
> > > the built artifacts because the jars contain Maven metadata and the
> > > POMs are signed. I've never needed to do this before but my guess is
> > > that we have to configure the maven-jar-plugin to set the classifier
> > > to hadoop1 or hadoop2 depending on the profile.
> > >
> > > We'll have to check whether we can run "mvn release:perform" twice
> (once
> > > for each profile) or if that requires some extra trickery.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Josh Wills wrote:
> > > > We haven't really been in the habit of planning the releases-- my
> sense
> > > has
> > > > been that we do a release when it feels like there's enough good
> stuff in
> > > > the snapshot to merit doing one, and I certainly feel like that's the
> > > case
> > > > now.
> > > >
> > > > My one question for the devs on the next release would be if (and
> how) we
> > > > should go about creating both hadoop1 and hadoop2-based binary
> > > > releases/Maven artifacts. If anyone has strong feelings on it either
> way,
> > > > I'd like to hear them, along with a recommendations of the best way
> to
> > > > express it in the version for the release (e.g., 0.7.0-hadoop1 and
> > > > 0.7.0-hadoop2? Or maybe use profiles in some way that I don't really
> > > > understand?)
> > > >
> > > > J
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Micah Whitacre <mk...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is there a documented release plan for the upcoming 0.7 version of
> > > Crunch?
> > > > > Or an expected date?
> > > > >
> > > > > There are a few fixes that have been resolved (CRUNCH-217)
> specifically
> > > > > that I know would be useful to have released.
> > > > >
> > > > > Micah
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Director of Data Science
> > > > Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
> > > > Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
> > >
>
--
Director of Data Science
Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
Re: Crunch 0.7 Expected Release?
Posted by Matthias Friedrich <ma...@mafr.de>.
Thanks! MRunit is another example. It looks like we have to take
special care of the release assemblies, but other than that I don't
see anything out of the ordinary.
Regards,
Matthias
On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Victor Iacoban wrote:
> Avro is doing this for avro-mapred, might use as a reference
>
> --victor
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Matthias Friedrich <ma...@mafr.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't think Maven allows you to create both hadoop1 and hadoop2
> > artifacts from the same execution. And we obviously can't just rename
> > the built artifacts because the jars contain Maven metadata and the
> > POMs are signed. I've never needed to do this before but my guess is
> > that we have to configure the maven-jar-plugin to set the classifier
> > to hadoop1 or hadoop2 depending on the profile.
> >
> > We'll have to check whether we can run "mvn release:perform" twice (once
> > for each profile) or if that requires some extra trickery.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html
> >
> > On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Josh Wills wrote:
> > > We haven't really been in the habit of planning the releases-- my sense
> > has
> > > been that we do a release when it feels like there's enough good stuff in
> > > the snapshot to merit doing one, and I certainly feel like that's the
> > case
> > > now.
> > >
> > > My one question for the devs on the next release would be if (and how) we
> > > should go about creating both hadoop1 and hadoop2-based binary
> > > releases/Maven artifacts. If anyone has strong feelings on it either way,
> > > I'd like to hear them, along with a recommendations of the best way to
> > > express it in the version for the release (e.g., 0.7.0-hadoop1 and
> > > 0.7.0-hadoop2? Or maybe use profiles in some way that I don't really
> > > understand?)
> > >
> > > J
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Micah Whitacre <mk...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a documented release plan for the upcoming 0.7 version of
> > Crunch?
> > > > Or an expected date?
> > > >
> > > > There are a few fixes that have been resolved (CRUNCH-217) specifically
> > > > that I know would be useful to have released.
> > > >
> > > > Micah
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Director of Data Science
> > > Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
> > > Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
> >
Re: Crunch 0.7 Expected Release?
Posted by Victor Iacoban <vi...@gmail.com>.
Avro is doing this for avro-mapred, might use as a reference
--victor
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Matthias Friedrich <ma...@mafr.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think Maven allows you to create both hadoop1 and hadoop2
> artifacts from the same execution. And we obviously can't just rename
> the built artifacts because the jars contain Maven metadata and the
> POMs are signed. I've never needed to do this before but my guess is
> that we have to configure the maven-jar-plugin to set the classifier
> to hadoop1 or hadoop2 depending on the profile.
>
> We'll have to check whether we can run "mvn release:perform" twice (once
> for each profile) or if that requires some extra trickery.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html
>
> On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Josh Wills wrote:
> > We haven't really been in the habit of planning the releases-- my sense
> has
> > been that we do a release when it feels like there's enough good stuff in
> > the snapshot to merit doing one, and I certainly feel like that's the
> case
> > now.
> >
> > My one question for the devs on the next release would be if (and how) we
> > should go about creating both hadoop1 and hadoop2-based binary
> > releases/Maven artifacts. If anyone has strong feelings on it either way,
> > I'd like to hear them, along with a recommendations of the best way to
> > express it in the version for the release (e.g., 0.7.0-hadoop1 and
> > 0.7.0-hadoop2? Or maybe use profiles in some way that I don't really
> > understand?)
> >
> > J
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Micah Whitacre <mk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a documented release plan for the upcoming 0.7 version of
> Crunch?
> > > Or an expected date?
> > >
> > > There are a few fixes that have been resolved (CRUNCH-217) specifically
> > > that I know would be useful to have released.
> > >
> > > Micah
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Director of Data Science
> > Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
> > Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
>
Re: Crunch 0.7 Expected Release?
Posted by Matthias Friedrich <ma...@mafr.de>.
Hi,
I don't think Maven allows you to create both hadoop1 and hadoop2
artifacts from the same execution. And we obviously can't just rename
the built artifacts because the jars contain Maven metadata and the
POMs are signed. I've never needed to do this before but my guess is
that we have to configure the maven-jar-plugin to set the classifier
to hadoop1 or hadoop2 depending on the profile.
We'll have to check whether we can run "mvn release:perform" twice (once
for each profile) or if that requires some extra trickery.
Regards,
Matthias
[1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html
On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Josh Wills wrote:
> We haven't really been in the habit of planning the releases-- my sense has
> been that we do a release when it feels like there's enough good stuff in
> the snapshot to merit doing one, and I certainly feel like that's the case
> now.
>
> My one question for the devs on the next release would be if (and how) we
> should go about creating both hadoop1 and hadoop2-based binary
> releases/Maven artifacts. If anyone has strong feelings on it either way,
> I'd like to hear them, along with a recommendations of the best way to
> express it in the version for the release (e.g., 0.7.0-hadoop1 and
> 0.7.0-hadoop2? Or maybe use profiles in some way that I don't really
> understand?)
>
> J
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Micah Whitacre <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a documented release plan for the upcoming 0.7 version of Crunch?
> > Or an expected date?
> >
> > There are a few fixes that have been resolved (CRUNCH-217) specifically
> > that I know would be useful to have released.
> >
> > Micah
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Director of Data Science
> Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
> Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
Re: Crunch 0.7 Expected Release?
Posted by Josh Wills <jw...@cloudera.com>.
We haven't really been in the habit of planning the releases-- my sense has
been that we do a release when it feels like there's enough good stuff in
the snapshot to merit doing one, and I certainly feel like that's the case
now.
My one question for the devs on the next release would be if (and how) we
should go about creating both hadoop1 and hadoop2-based binary
releases/Maven artifacts. If anyone has strong feelings on it either way,
I'd like to hear them, along with a recommendations of the best way to
express it in the version for the release (e.g., 0.7.0-hadoop1 and
0.7.0-hadoop2? Or maybe use profiles in some way that I don't really
understand?)
J
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Micah Whitacre <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a documented release plan for the upcoming 0.7 version of Crunch?
> Or an expected date?
>
> There are a few fixes that have been resolved (CRUNCH-217) specifically
> that I know would be useful to have released.
>
> Micah
>
--
Director of Data Science
Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>