You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/04 03:09:00 UTC

Time for 1.2.1?

Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?


-David

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

...so you accept to not follow the spec and breaks apps?

I dont! I dont know for openjpa but owb is clearly blocking...1.5.2 is
unusable, i dont want another dead release
Le 6 nov. 2013 21:42, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a
> release or always for a bug to fix.
> We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if we
> identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to
> release more than once a year.
>
> So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully
> fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do.
>
> For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we
> did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out.
>
> Any thoughts/objections?
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the
> > users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from their
> > product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>  Seems
> > there cutoff is Friday.
> >
> > Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two
> > releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA
> > 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression
> > which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps
> which
> > run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently
> > failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> > >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hey,
> > >>
> > >> Still there at least for the moment lol
> > >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain
> > but
> > >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
> > >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks a lot
> > >> Jean Louis
> > >>
> > >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> > >>
> > >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it
> > needs
> > >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> > misunderstand).
> > >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> > >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.
>  But
> > I
> > >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
> > :)  I
> > >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him
> to
> > >>> get
> > >>>> the release started.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -David
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> > >>>>>> Should be really easy.
> > >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> > >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
> > short
> > >>>> this
> > >>>>>> week...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> LieGrue,
> > >>>>>> strub
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> Cc:
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Lol
> > >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
> > >>> fixes
> > >>>>>> but
> > >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>> a écrit :
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> -David
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>.

Hi Jean-Louis,


The renaming is fine for me

Arne

Am 08.11.13 09:37 schrieb "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" unter <je...@gmail.com>:

>OK added the module in the parent pom.
>Temporary added -preview to the artifact id.
>
>ArtifactId changed from openwebbeans-cdi11 to openwebbeans-cdi11-preview.
>Is that ok for everybody?
>
>If yes, I'm ready to create binaries and cast a vote.
>
>Jean-Louis
>
>
>2013/11/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
>> PS: if you release 1.2.1 please activate the cdi11 module. Maybe we
>> should append prealpha to the version but it is needed by batchee and
>> bval N+1
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > reviewed it for what i was able to do, some review from
>> > Gerhard/Mark/Arne would be great too
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> Trying to prepare the release.
>> >> Was cleaning up JIRA
>> >>
>> 
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20re
>>solution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for"
>>attribute is
>> >> not set.
>> >> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix
>>for"
>> >> field to XXX.
>> >> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are
>>really
>> >> resolved?
>> >>
>> >> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>> >>
>> >> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long
>> nor
>> >> hard.
>> >> Thanks for your help.
>> >>
>> >> Jean-Louis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> *tested
>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad
>>as I
>> >>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>> >>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the
>> fix.
>> >>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that
>>was
>> my
>> >>> main
>> >>> >> purpose.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> JLouis
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> sure, go on.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> LieGrue,
>> >>> >>> strub
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >________________________________
>> >>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>> >>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always
>>wait
>> >>> for a
>> >>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>> >>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release
>>more
>> even
>> >>> if
>> >>> >>> we
>> >>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we
>>are
>> able
>> >>> to
>> >>> >>> >release more than once a year.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is
>> not
>> >>> fully
>> >>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>> >>> fix/do.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can
>> fork
>> >>> as we
>> >>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it
>>gets
>> >>> out.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >JLouis
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds
>> guys
>> >>> on the
>> >>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE
>> from
>> >>> >>> their
>> >>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since
>> July.
>> >>> >>> Seems
>> >>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is
>>to
>> do
>> >>> two
>> >>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed
>>and
>> >>> OpenJPA
>> >>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> -David
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg
>><st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>> >>> regression
>> >>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my
>>old
>> >>> apps
>> >>> >>> which
>> >>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>> >>> (currently
>> >>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
>> >>> >>> >> > strub
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> >>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >> Hey,
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>> >>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss
>> with
>> >>> Romain
>> >>> >>> >> but
>> >>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a
>> look we
>> >>> >>> could
>> >>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>> >>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>> >>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>> >>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a
>> patch
>> >>> but
>> >>> >>> it
>> >>> >>> >> needs
>> >>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>> >>> >>> >> misunderstand).
>> >>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >>> a
>> >>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would
>>release
>> >>> today.
>> >>> >>> But
>> >>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few
>>days
>> >>> overdue
>> >>> >>> >> :)  I
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping
>> in for
>> >>> >>> him to
>> >>> >>> >> >>> get
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> -David
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> >>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time
>> is a
>> >>> bit
>> >>> >>> >> short
>> >>> >>> >> >>>> this
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were
>> waiting
>> >>> some
>> >>> >>> >> >>> fixes
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe
>>today
>> or
>> >>> so.
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>> >>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1
>>release?
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >--
>> >>> >>> >Jean-Louis
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> Jean-Louis
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

OK added the module in the parent pom.
Temporary added -preview to the artifact id.

ArtifactId changed from openwebbeans-cdi11 to openwebbeans-cdi11-preview.
Is that ok for everybody?

If yes, I'm ready to create binaries and cast a vote.

Jean-Louis


2013/11/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>

> PS: if you release 1.2.1 please activate the cdi11 module. Maybe we
> should append prealpha to the version but it is needed by batchee and
> bval N+1
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > reviewed it for what i was able to do, some review from
> > Gerhard/Mark/Arne would be great too
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> Trying to prepare the release.
> >> Was cleaning up JIRA
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >>
> >>
> >> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
> >> not set.
> >> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
> >> field to XXX.
> >> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
> >> resolved?
> >>
> >> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
> >>
> >> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long
> nor
> >> hard.
> >> Thanks for your help.
> >>
> >> Jean-Louis
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> *tested
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
> >>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
> >>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the
> fix.
> >>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was
> my
> >>> main
> >>> >> purpose.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> JLouis
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> sure, go on.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> >>> strub
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> >________________________________
> >>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
> >>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait
> >>> for a
> >>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
> >>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more
> even
> >>> if
> >>> >>> we
> >>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are
> able
> >>> to
> >>> >>> >release more than once a year.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is
> not
> >>> fully
> >>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
> >>> fix/do.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can
> fork
> >>> as we
> >>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets
> >>> out.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >JLouis
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds
> guys
> >>> on the
> >>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE
> from
> >>> >>> their
> >>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since
> July.
> >>> >>> Seems
> >>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to
> do
> >>> two
> >>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
> >>> OpenJPA
> >>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> -David
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
> >>> regression
> >>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old
> >>> apps
> >>> >>> which
> >>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
> >>> (currently
> >>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
> >>> >>> >> > strub
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
> >>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> >>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >> Hey,
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
> >>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss
> with
> >>> Romain
> >>> >>> >> but
> >>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a
> look we
> >>> >>> could
> >>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
> >>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
> >>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
> >>> >>> >> écrit :
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a
> patch
> >>> but
> >>> >>> it
> >>> >>> >> needs
> >>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> >>> >>> >> misunderstand).
> >>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> >>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <
> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >>> a
> >>> >>> >> écrit :
> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
> >>> today.
> >>> >>> But
> >>> >>> >> I
> >>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days
> >>> overdue
> >>> >>> >> :)  I
> >>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping
> in for
> >>> >>> him to
> >>> >>> >> >>> get
> >>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
> >>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>> -David
> >>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> >>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time
> is a
> >>> bit
> >>> >>> >> short
> >>> >>> >> >>>> this
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were
> waiting
> >>> some
> >>> >>> >> >>> fixes
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today
> or
> >>> so.
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
> >>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>> --
> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >--
> >>> >>> >Jean-Louis
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Jean-Louis
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

PS: if you release 1.2.1 please activate the cdi11 module. Maybe we
should append prealpha to the version but it is needed by batchee and
bval N+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> reviewed it for what i was able to do, some review from
> Gerhard/Mark/Arne would be great too
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Trying to prepare the release.
>> Was cleaning up JIRA
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>
>>
>> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
>> not set.
>> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
>> field to XXX.
>> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
>> resolved?
>>
>> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>>
>> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor
>> hard.
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> *tested
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
>>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
>>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>>> >>
>>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my
>>> main
>>> >> purpose.
>>> >>
>>> >> JLouis
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> >>
>>> >>> sure, go on.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> LieGrue,
>>> >>> strub
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >________________________________
>>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait
>>> for a
>>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even
>>> if
>>> >>> we
>>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able
>>> to
>>> >>> >release more than once a year.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not
>>> fully
>>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>>> fix/do.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork
>>> as we
>>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets
>>> out.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >JLouis
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys
>>> on the
>>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
>>> >>> their
>>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>>> >>> Seems
>>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do
>>> two
>>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
>>> OpenJPA
>>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> -David
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>>> regression
>>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old
>>> apps
>>> >>> which
>>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>>> (currently
>>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
>>> >>> >> > strub
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
>>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Hey,
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with
>>> Romain
>>> >>> >> but
>>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
>>> >>> could
>>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>>> >>> >> écrit :
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch
>>> but
>>> >>> it
>>> >>> >> needs
>>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>>> >>> >> misunderstand).
>>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>>> a
>>> >>> >> écrit :
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
>>> today.
>>> >>> But
>>> >>> >> I
>>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days
>>> overdue
>>> >>> >> :)  I
>>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
>>> >>> him to
>>> >>> >> >>> get
>>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> -David
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a
>>> bit
>>> >>> >> short
>>> >>> >> >>>> this
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting
>>> some
>>> >>> >> >>> fixes
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or
>>> so.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >--
>>> >>> >Jean-Louis
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

reviewed it for what i was able to do, some review from
Gerhard/Mark/Arne would be great too
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> Hey guys,
>
> Trying to prepare the release.
> Was cleaning up JIRA
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
> not set.
> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
> field to XXX.
> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
> resolved?
>
> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>
> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor
> hard.
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
>> *tested
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>> >>
>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my
>> main
>> >> purpose.
>> >>
>> >> JLouis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>
>> >>> sure, go on.
>> >>>
>> >>> LieGrue,
>> >>> strub
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> >________________________________
>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait
>> for a
>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even
>> if
>> >>> we
>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able
>> to
>> >>> >release more than once a year.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not
>> fully
>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>> fix/do.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork
>> as we
>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets
>> out.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >JLouis
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys
>> on the
>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
>> >>> their
>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>> >>> Seems
>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do
>> two
>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
>> OpenJPA
>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> -David
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>> regression
>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old
>> apps
>> >>> which
>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>> (currently
>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
>> >>> >> > strub
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Hey,
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with
>> Romain
>> >>> >> but
>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
>> >>> could
>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch
>> but
>> >>> it
>> >>> >> needs
>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>> >>> >> misunderstand).
>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>> a
>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
>> today.
>> >>> But
>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days
>> overdue
>> >>> >> :)  I
>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
>> >>> him to
>> >>> >> >>> get
>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> -David
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a
>> bit
>> >>> >> short
>> >>> >> >>>> this
>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting
>> some
>> >>> >> >>> fixes
>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or
>> so.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >--
>> >>> >Jean-Louis
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

+1, thks JL!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> Ok, if everyone is ok, I gonna try to roll the 1.2.1.
> Even if the vote gets canceled, it's still a good exercise for me :D
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>> No problem, let it as is.
>>
>> It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the
>> release imo.
>> Especially if you have to reroll.
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >To: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <
>> struberg@yahoo.de>
>> >Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00
>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >
>> >
>> >oops sorry :s
>> >Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>> >> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.
>> >>
>> >> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally
>> shipped the release.
>> >>
>> >> LieGrue,
>> >> strub
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>________________________________
>> >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>>Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>>Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
>> >>>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Hey guys,
>> >>>
>> >>>Trying to prepare the release.
>> >>>Was cleaning up JIRA
>> >>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
>> >>>not set.
>> >>>Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
>> >>>field to XXX.
>> >>>Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
>> >>>resolved?
>> >>>
>> >>>Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>> >>>
>> >>>Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long
>> nor
>> >>>hard.
>> >>>Thanks for your help.
>> >>>
>> >>>Jean-Louis
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>>> *tested
>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as
>> I
>> >>>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>> >>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the
>> fix.
>> >>>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was
>> my
>> >>>> main
>> >>>> >> purpose.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> JLouis
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>> sure, go on.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> LieGrue,
>> >>>> >>> strub
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> >________________________________
>> >>>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>> >>>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always
>> wait
>> >>>> for a
>> >>>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>> >>>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more
>> even
>> >>>> if
>> >>>> >>> we
>> >>>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are
>> able
>> >>>> to
>> >>>> >>> >release more than once a year.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is
>> not
>> >>>> fully
>> >>>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>> >>>> fix/do.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can
>> fork
>> >>>> as we
>> >>>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it
>> gets
>> >>>> out.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >JLouis
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds
>> guys
>> >>>> on the
>> >>>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE
>> from
>> >>>> >>> their
>> >>>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since
>> July.
>> >>>> >>> Seems
>> >>>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to
>> do
>> >>>> two
>> >>>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
>> >>>> OpenJPA
>> >>>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> -David
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>> >>>> regression
>> >>>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my
>> old
>> >>>> apps
>> >>>> >>> which
>> >>>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>> >>>> (currently
>> >>>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
>> >>>> >>> >> > strub
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >>>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Hey,
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss
>> with
>> >>>> Romain
>> >>>> >>> >> but
>> >>>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a
>> look we
>> >>>> >>> could
>> >>>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>> >>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>> >>>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a
>> patch
>> >>>> but
>> >>>> >>> it
>> >>>> >>> >> needs
>> >>>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>> >>>> >>> >> misunderstand).
>> >>>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >>>> a
>> >>>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
>> >>>> today.
>> >>>> >>> But
>> >>>> >>> >> I
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few
>> days
>> >>>> overdue
>> >>>> >>> >> :)  I
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping
>> in for
>> >>>> >>> him to
>> >>>> >>> >> >>> get
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> -David
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> >>>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time
>> is a
>> >>>> bit
>> >>>> >>> >> short
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> this
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were
>> waiting
>> >>>> some
>> >>>> >>> >> >>> fixes
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe
>> today or
>> >>>> so.
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>> >>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >> >>
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >>
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >--
>> >>>> >>> >Jean-Louis
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> --
>> >>>> >> Jean-Louis
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>--
>> >>>Jean-Louis
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

All done.
VOTE sent, please review and give feedback please.

First release ever in OpenWebBeans for me, so something may has failed :D

Jean-Louis


2013/11/8 Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com>

> 1+
>
>
> On 8 November 2013 11:52, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 :)
> >
> >
> > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, if everyone is ok, I gonna try to roll the 1.2.1.
> > > Even if the vote gets canceled, it's still a good exercise for me :D
> > >
> > > JLouis
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >
> > >> No problem, let it as is.
> > >>
> > >> It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the
> > >> release imo.
> > >> Especially if you have to reroll.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <
> > >> struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >>> Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00
> > >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> oops sorry :s
> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> > >>>> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we
> finally
> > >> shipped the release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> LieGrue,
> > >>>> strub
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>>>> Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hey guys,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Trying to prepare the release.
> > >>>>> Was cleaning up JIRA
> > >>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for"
> > attribute is
> > >>>>> not set.
> > >>>>> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix
> > for"
> > >>>>> field to XXX.
> > >>>>> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are
> > really
> > >>>>> resolved?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that
> long
> > >> nor
> > >>>>> hard.
> > >>>>> Thanks for your help.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> *tested
> > >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > >>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > >>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>> testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad
> as
> > >> I
> > >>>>>>> thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
> > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > >>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > >>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the
> > >> fix.
> > >>>>>>>> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that
> was
> > >> my
> > >>>>>> main
> > >>>>>>>> purpose.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> JLouis
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> sure, go on.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> > >>>>>>>>> strub
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always
> > >> wait
> > >>>>>> for a
> > >>>>>>>>>> release or always for a bug to fix.
> > >>>>>>>>>> We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release
> more
> > >> even
> > >>>>>> if
> > >>>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>> identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we
> are
> > >> able
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> release more than once a year.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912
> is
> > >> not
> > >>>>>> fully
> > >>>>>>>>>> fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things
> to
> > >>>>>> fix/do.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can
> > >> fork
> > >>>>>> as we
> > >>>>>>>>>> did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it
> > >> gets
> > >>>>>> out.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/objections?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds
> > >> guys
> > >>>>>> on the
> > >>>>>>>>>>> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache
> TomEE
> > >> from
> > >>>>>>>>> their
> > >>>>>>>>>>> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since
> > >> July.
> > >>>>>>>>> Seems
> > >>>>>>>>>>> there cutoff is Friday.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is
> to
> > >> do
> > >>>>>> two
> > >>>>>>>>>>> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed
> and
> > >>>>>> OpenJPA
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> -David
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <
> struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
> > >>>>>> regression
> > >>>>>>>>>>> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my
> > >> old
> > >>>>>> apps
> > >>>>>>>>> which
> > >>>>>>>>>>> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
> > >>>>>> (currently
> > >>>>>>>>>>> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> strub
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still there at least for the moment lol
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss
> > >> with
> > >>>>>> Romain
> > >>>>>>>>>>> but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a
> > >> look we
> > >>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Louis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
> > >>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a
> > >> patch
> > >>>>>> but
> > >>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>> needs
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> > >>>>>>>>>>> misunderstand).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <
> > >> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
> > >>>>>> today.
> > >>>>>>>>> But
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few
> > >> days
> > >>>>>> overdue
> > >>>>>>>>>>> :)  I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping
> > >> in for
> > >>>>>>>>> him to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release started.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> > >>>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should be really easy.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time
> > >> is a
> > >>>>>> bit
> > >>>>>>>>>>> short
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lol
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were
> > >> waiting
> > >>>>>> some
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe
> > >> today or
> > >>>>>> so.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
> > >>>>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com>.

1+


On 8 November 2013 11:52, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 :)
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, if everyone is ok, I gonna try to roll the 1.2.1.
> > Even if the vote gets canceled, it's still a good exercise for me :D
> >
> > JLouis
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >
> >> No problem, let it as is.
> >>
> >> It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the
> >> release imo.
> >> Especially if you have to reroll.
> >>
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <
> >> struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>> Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00
> >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> oops sorry :s
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> >>>> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.
> >>>>
> >>>> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally
> >> shipped the release.
> >>>>
> >>>> LieGrue,
> >>>> strub
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>>> Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hey guys,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Trying to prepare the release.
> >>>>> Was cleaning up JIRA
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for"
> attribute is
> >>>>> not set.
> >>>>> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix
> for"
> >>>>> field to XXX.
> >>>>> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are
> really
> >>>>> resolved?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long
> >> nor
> >>>>> hard.
> >>>>> Thanks for your help.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> *tested
> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>> testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as
> >> I
> >>>>>>> thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the
> >> fix.
> >>>>>>>> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was
> >> my
> >>>>>> main
> >>>>>>>> purpose.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> sure, go on.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always
> >> wait
> >>>>>> for a
> >>>>>>>>>> release or always for a bug to fix.
> >>>>>>>>>> We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more
> >> even
> >>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>> identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are
> >> able
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> release more than once a year.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is
> >> not
> >>>>>> fully
> >>>>>>>>>> fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
> >>>>>> fix/do.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can
> >> fork
> >>>>>> as we
> >>>>>>>>>> did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it
> >> gets
> >>>>>> out.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/objections?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds
> >> guys
> >>>>>> on the
> >>>>>>>>>>> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE
> >> from
> >>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since
> >> July.
> >>>>>>>>> Seems
> >>>>>>>>>>> there cutoff is Friday.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to
> >> do
> >>>>>> two
> >>>>>>>>>>> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
> >>>>>> OpenJPA
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
> >>>>>> regression
> >>>>>>>>>>> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my
> >> old
> >>>>>> apps
> >>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
> >>>>>> (currently
> >>>>>>>>>>> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still there at least for the moment lol
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss
> >> with
> >>>>>> Romain
> >>>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a
> >> look we
> >>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
> >>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
> >>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a
> >> patch
> >>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>> needs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> >>>>>>>>>>> misunderstand).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <
> >> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
> >>>>>> today.
> >>>>>>>>> But
> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few
> >> days
> >>>>>> overdue
> >>>>>>>>>>> :)  I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping
> >> in for
> >>>>>>>>> him to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release started.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> >>>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should be really easy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time
> >> is a
> >>>>>> bit
> >>>>>>>>>>> short
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lol
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were
> >> waiting
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe
> >> today or
> >>>>>> so.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
> >>>>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
>
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.

+1 :)


On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, if everyone is ok, I gonna try to roll the 1.2.1.
> Even if the vote gets canceled, it's still a good exercise for me :D
> 
> JLouis
> 
> 
> 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> 
>> No problem, let it as is.
>> 
>> It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the
>> release imo.
>> Especially if you have to reroll.
>> 
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> To: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <
>> struberg@yahoo.de>
>>> Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00
>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> oops sorry :s
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.
>>>> 
>>>> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally
>> shipped the release.
>>>> 
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>>> Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Trying to prepare the release.
>>>>> Was cleaning up JIRA
>>>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
>>>>> not set.
>>>>> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
>>>>> field to XXX.
>>>>> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
>>>>> resolved?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long
>> nor
>>>>> hard.
>>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> *tested
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as
>> I
>>>>>>> thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the
>> fix.
>>>>>>>> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was
>> my
>>>>>> main
>>>>>>>> purpose.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> sure, go on.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always
>> wait
>>>>>> for a
>>>>>>>>>> release or always for a bug to fix.
>>>>>>>>>> We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more
>> even
>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are
>> able
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> release more than once a year.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is
>> not
>>>>>> fully
>>>>>>>>>> fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>>>>>> fix/do.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can
>> fork
>>>>>> as we
>>>>>>>>>> did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it
>> gets
>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/objections?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds
>> guys
>>>>>> on the
>>>>>>>>>>> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE
>> from
>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since
>> July.
>>>>>>>>> Seems
>>>>>>>>>>> there cutoff is Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to
>> do
>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>>>> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
>>>>>> OpenJPA
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>>>>>> regression
>>>>>>>>>>> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my
>> old
>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>>>>>> (currently
>>>>>>>>>>> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still there at least for the moment lol
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss
>> with
>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a
>> look we
>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a
>> patch
>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstand).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
>>>>>> today.
>>>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few
>> days
>>>>>> overdue
>>>>>>>>>>> :)  I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping
>> in for
>>>>>>>>> him to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release started.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>>>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should be really easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time
>> is a
>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>> short
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were
>> waiting
>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe
>> today or
>>>>>> so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>>>>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

Ok, if everyone is ok, I gonna try to roll the 1.2.1.
Even if the vote gets canceled, it's still a good exercise for me :D

JLouis


2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>

> No problem, let it as is.
>
> It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the
> release imo.
> Especially if you have to reroll.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >To: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <
> struberg@yahoo.de>
> >Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00
> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >
> >
> >oops sorry :s
> >Romain Manni-Bucau
> >Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> >> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.
> >>
> >> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally
> shipped the release.
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>________________________________
> >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
> >>>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>>Trying to prepare the release.
> >>>Was cleaning up JIRA
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
> >>>not set.
> >>>Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
> >>>field to XXX.
> >>>Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
> >>>resolved?
> >>>
> >>>Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
> >>>
> >>>Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long
> nor
> >>>hard.
> >>>Thanks for your help.
> >>>
> >>>Jean-Louis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>> *tested
> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >>>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as
> I
> >>>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
> >>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> >>>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the
> fix.
> >>>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was
> my
> >>>> main
> >>>> >> purpose.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> JLouis
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> sure, go on.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> LieGrue,
> >>>> >>> strub
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> >________________________________
> >>>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
> >>>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always
> wait
> >>>> for a
> >>>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
> >>>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more
> even
> >>>> if
> >>>> >>> we
> >>>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are
> able
> >>>> to
> >>>> >>> >release more than once a year.
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is
> not
> >>>> fully
> >>>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
> >>>> fix/do.
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can
> fork
> >>>> as we
> >>>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it
> gets
> >>>> out.
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >JLouis
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds
> guys
> >>>> on the
> >>>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE
> from
> >>>> >>> their
> >>>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since
> July.
> >>>> >>> Seems
> >>>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
> >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to
> do
> >>>> two
> >>>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
> >>>> OpenJPA
> >>>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
> >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> >>> >> -David
> >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
> >>>> regression
> >>>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my
> old
> >>>> apps
> >>>> >>> which
> >>>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
> >>>> (currently
> >>>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
> >>>> >>> >> > strub
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
> >>>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> >>>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >> Hey,
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
> >>>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss
> with
> >>>> Romain
> >>>> >>> >> but
> >>>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a
> look we
> >>>> >>> could
> >>>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
> >>>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
> >>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
> >>>> >>> >> écrit :
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a
> patch
> >>>> but
> >>>> >>> it
> >>>> >>> >> needs
> >>>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> >>>> >>> >> misunderstand).
> >>>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> >>>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <
> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >>>> a
> >>>> >>> >> écrit :
> >>>> >>> >> >>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
> >>>> today.
> >>>> >>> But
> >>>> >>> >> I
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few
> days
> >>>> overdue
> >>>> >>> >> :)  I
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping
> in for
> >>>> >>> him to
> >>>> >>> >> >>> get
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> -David
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> >>>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time
> is a
> >>>> bit
> >>>> >>> >> short
> >>>> >>> >> >>>> this
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were
> waiting
> >>>> some
> >>>> >>> >> >>> fixes
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe
> today or
> >>>> so.
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
> >>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> --
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>>
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >--
> >>>> >>> >Jean-Louis
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> Jean-Louis
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Jean-Louis
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.

No problem, let it as is. 

It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the release imo.
Especially if you have to reroll.


LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>To: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> 
>Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00
>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> 
>
>oops sorry :s
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
>2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.
>>
>> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally shipped the release.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
>>>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>
>>>
>>>Hey guys,
>>>
>>>Trying to prepare the release.
>>>Was cleaning up JIRA
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>>
>>>
>>>Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
>>>not set.
>>>Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
>>>field to XXX.
>>>Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
>>>resolved?
>>>
>>>Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>>>
>>>Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor
>>>hard.
>>>Thanks for your help.
>>>
>>>Jean-Louis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> *tested
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
>>>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>>>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
>>>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my
>>>> main
>>>> >> purpose.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> JLouis
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> sure, go on.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> LieGrue,
>>>> >>> strub
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> >________________________________
>>>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>>>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait
>>>> for a
>>>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>>>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even
>>>> if
>>>> >>> we
>>>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able
>>>> to
>>>> >>> >release more than once a year.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not
>>>> fully
>>>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>>>> fix/do.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork
>>>> as we
>>>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets
>>>> out.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >JLouis
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys
>>>> on the
>>>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
>>>> >>> their
>>>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>>>> >>> Seems
>>>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do
>>>> two
>>>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
>>>> OpenJPA
>>>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> -David
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>>>> regression
>>>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old
>>>> apps
>>>> >>> which
>>>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>>>> (currently
>>>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
>>>> >>> >> > strub
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
>>>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>>>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >> Hey,
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>>>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with
>>>> Romain
>>>> >>> >> but
>>>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
>>>> >>> could
>>>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>>>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>>>> >>> >> écrit :
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch
>>>> but
>>>> >>> it
>>>> >>> >> needs
>>>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>>>> >>> >> misunderstand).
>>>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>>>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> a
>>>> >>> >> écrit :
>>>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
>>>> today.
>>>> >>> But
>>>> >>> >> I
>>>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days
>>>> overdue
>>>> >>> >> :)  I
>>>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
>>>> >>> him to
>>>> >>> >> >>> get
>>>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
>>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>> -David
>>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>>>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a
>>>> bit
>>>> >>> >> short
>>>> >>> >> >>>> this
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting
>>>> some
>>>> >>> >> >>> fixes
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or
>>>> so.
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >--
>>>> >>> >Jean-Louis
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Jean-Louis
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Jean-Louis
>>>
>>>
>
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

oops sorry :s
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.
>
> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally shipped the release.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
>>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>
>>
>>Hey guys,
>>
>>Trying to prepare the release.
>>Was cleaning up JIRA
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>
>>
>>Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
>>not set.
>>Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
>>field to XXX.
>>Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
>>resolved?
>>
>>Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>>
>>Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor
>>hard.
>>Thanks for your help.
>>
>>Jean-Louis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> *tested
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
>>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
>>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>>> >>
>>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my
>>> main
>>> >> purpose.
>>> >>
>>> >> JLouis
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> >>
>>> >>> sure, go on.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> LieGrue,
>>> >>> strub
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >________________________________
>>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait
>>> for a
>>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even
>>> if
>>> >>> we
>>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able
>>> to
>>> >>> >release more than once a year.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not
>>> fully
>>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>>> fix/do.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork
>>> as we
>>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets
>>> out.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >JLouis
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys
>>> on the
>>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
>>> >>> their
>>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>>> >>> Seems
>>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do
>>> two
>>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
>>> OpenJPA
>>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> -David
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>>> regression
>>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old
>>> apps
>>> >>> which
>>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>>> (currently
>>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
>>> >>> >> > strub
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
>>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Hey,
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with
>>> Romain
>>> >>> >> but
>>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
>>> >>> could
>>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>>> >>> >> écrit :
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch
>>> but
>>> >>> it
>>> >>> >> needs
>>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>>> >>> >> misunderstand).
>>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>>> a
>>> >>> >> écrit :
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
>>> today.
>>> >>> But
>>> >>> >> I
>>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days
>>> overdue
>>> >>> >> :)  I
>>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
>>> >>> him to
>>> >>> >> >>> get
>>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> -David
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a
>>> bit
>>> >>> >> short
>>> >>> >> >>>> this
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting
>>> some
>>> >>> >> >>> fixes
>>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or
>>> so.
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>>
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >--
>>> >>> >Jean-Louis
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Jean-Louis
>>
>>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.

nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed.

The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally shipped the release.

LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
>Cc: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> 
>Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49
>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> 
>
>Hey guys,
>
>Trying to prepare the release.
>Was cleaning up JIRA
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
>not set.
>Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
>field to XXX.
>Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
>resolved?
>
>Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.
>
>Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor
>hard.
>Thanks for your help.
>
>Jean-Louis
>
>
>
>
>
>2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
>> *tested
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>> >>
>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my
>> main
>> >> purpose.
>> >>
>> >> JLouis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>
>> >>> sure, go on.
>> >>>
>> >>> LieGrue,
>> >>> strub
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> >________________________________
>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait
>> for a
>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even
>> if
>> >>> we
>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able
>> to
>> >>> >release more than once a year.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not
>> fully
>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
>> fix/do.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork
>> as we
>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets
>> out.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >JLouis
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys
>> on the
>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
>> >>> their
>> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>> >>> Seems
>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do
>> two
>> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
>> OpenJPA
>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> -David
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
>> regression
>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old
>> apps
>> >>> which
>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
>> (currently
>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > LieGrue,
>> >>> >> > strub
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Hey,
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with
>> Romain
>> >>> >> but
>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
>> >>> could
>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch
>> but
>> >>> it
>> >>> >> needs
>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>> >>> >> misunderstand).
>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>> a
>> >>> >> écrit :
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
>> today.
>> >>> But
>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days
>> overdue
>> >>> >> :)  I
>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
>> >>> him to
>> >>> >> >>> get
>> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> -David
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a
>> bit
>> >>> >> short
>> >>> >> >>>> this
>> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting
>> some
>> >>> >> >>> fixes
>> >>> >> >>>>>> but
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or
>> so.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >--
>> >>> >Jean-Louis
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Jean-Louis
>
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

Hey guys,

Trying to prepare the release.
Was cleaning up JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC


Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is
not set.
Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for"
field to XXX.
Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really
resolved?

Then, I can finish the README from the release notes.

Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor
hard.
Thanks for your help.

Jean-Louis




2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>

> *tested
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
> >>
> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my
> main
> >> purpose.
> >>
> >> JLouis
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>
> >>> sure, go on.
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >________________________________
> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait
> for a
> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even
> if
> >>> we
> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able
> to
> >>> >release more than once a year.
> >>> >
> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not
> fully
> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to
> fix/do.
> >>> >
> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork
> as we
> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets
> out.
> >>> >
> >>> >Any thoughts/objections?
> >>> >
> >>> >JLouis
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>> >
> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys
> on the
> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
> >>> their
> >>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
> >>> Seems
> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do
> two
> >>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and
> OpenJPA
> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> -David
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a
> regression
> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old
> apps
> >>> which
> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test
> (currently
> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LieGrue,
> >>> >> > strub
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> ________________________________
> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Hey,
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with
> Romain
> >>> >> but
> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
> >>> could
> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot
> >>> >> >> Jean Louis
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com> a
> >>> >> écrit :
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch
> but
> >>> it
> >>> >> needs
> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> >>> >> misunderstand).
> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> a
> >>> >> écrit :
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release
> today.
> >>> But
> >>> >> I
> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days
> overdue
> >>> >> :)  I
> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
> >>> him to
> >>> >> >>> get
> >>> >> >>>> the release started.
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> -David
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> >>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> Hi,
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a
> bit
> >>> >> short
> >>> >> >>>> this
> >>> >> >>>>>> week...
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>> >> >>>>>> strub
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting
> some
> >>> >> >>> fixes
> >>> >> >>>>>> but
> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or
> so.
> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <
> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> --
> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >--
> >>> >Jean-Louis
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

*tested
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
> thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
>> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>>
>> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my main
>> purpose.
>>
>> JLouis
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>
>>> sure, go on.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >________________________________
>>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a
>>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if
>>> we
>>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to
>>> >release more than once a year.
>>> >
>>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully
>>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do.
>>> >
>>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we
>>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out.
>>> >
>>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>>> >
>>> >JLouis
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >
>>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the
>>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
>>> their
>>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>>> Seems
>>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>>> >>
>>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two
>>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA
>>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> -David
>>> >>
>>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression
>>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps
>>> which
>>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently
>>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > LieGrue,
>>> >> > strub
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> ________________________________
>>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Hey,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain
>>> >> but
>>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
>>> could
>>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>>> >> >> Jean Louis
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
>>> >> écrit :
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but
>>> it
>>> >> needs
>>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>>> >> misunderstand).
>>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
>>> >> écrit :
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.
>>> But
>>> >> I
>>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
>>> >> :)  I
>>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
>>> him to
>>> >> >>> get
>>> >> >>>> the release started.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> -David
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
>>> >> short
>>> >> >>>> this
>>> >> >>>>>> week...
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>>> >> >>>>>> strub
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
>>> >> >>> fixes
>>> >> >>>>>> but
>>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> --
>>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >Jean-Louis
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I
thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
>
> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my main
> purpose.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>> sure, go on.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >
>> >
>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a
>> >release or always for a bug to fix.
>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if
>> we
>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to
>> >release more than once a year.
>> >
>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully
>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do.
>> >
>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we
>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out.
>> >
>> >Any thoughts/objections?
>> >
>> >JLouis
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the
>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
>> their
>> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
>> Seems
>> >> there cutoff is Friday.
>> >>
>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two
>> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA
>> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -David
>> >>
>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression
>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps
>> which
>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently
>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>> >> >
>> >> > LieGrue,
>> >> > strub
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hey,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain
>> >> but
>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
>> could
>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks a lot
>> >> >> Jean Louis
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
>> >> écrit :
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but
>> it
>> >> needs
>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>> >> misunderstand).
>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
>> >> écrit :
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.
>> But
>> >> I
>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
>> >> :)  I
>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
>> him to
>> >> >>> get
>> >> >>>> the release started.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> -David
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Hi,
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
>> >> short
>> >> >>>> this
>> >> >>>>>> week...
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >> >>>>>> strub
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Lol
>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
>> >> >>> fixes
>> >> >>>>>> but
>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> -David
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Jean-Louis
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix.
You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.

If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my main
purpose.

JLouis


2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>

> sure, go on.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >
> >
> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a
> >release or always for a bug to fix.
> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if
> we
> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to
> >release more than once a year.
> >
> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully
> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do.
> >
> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we
> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out.
> >
> >Any thoughts/objections?
> >
> >JLouis
> >
> >
> >
> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the
> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from
> their
> >> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.
> Seems
> >> there cutoff is Friday.
> >>
> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two
> >> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA
> >> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression
> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps
> which
> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently
> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> >> >
> >> > LieGrue,
> >> > strub
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey,
> >> >>
> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain
> >> but
> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we
> could
> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks a lot
> >> >> Jean Louis
> >> >>
> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
> >> écrit :
> >> >>
> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but
> it
> >> needs
> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> >> misunderstand).
> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
> >> écrit :
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.
> But
> >> I
> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
> >> :)  I
> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for
> him to
> >> >>> get
> >> >>>> the release started.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -David
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Hi,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
> >> short
> >> >>>> this
> >> >>>>>> week...
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >> >>>>>> strub
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>> Cc:
> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Lol
> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
> >> >>> fixes
> >> >>>>>> but
> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>> a écrit :
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> -David
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Jean-Louis
> >
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.

sure, go on. 

LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
>Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41
>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> 
>
>here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a
>release or always for a bug to fix.
>We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if we
>identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to
>release more than once a year.
>
>So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully
>fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do.
>
>For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we
>did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out.
>
>Any thoughts/objections?
>
>JLouis
>
>
>
>2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the
>> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from their
>> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.  Seems
>> there cutoff is Friday.
>>
>> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two
>> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA
>> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression
>> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps which
>> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently
>> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hey,
>> >>
>> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
>> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain
>> but
>> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
>> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks a lot
>> >> Jean Louis
>> >>
>> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>> >>
>> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it
>> needs
>> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>> misunderstand).
>> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But
>> I
>> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
>> :)  I
>> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
>> >>> get
>> >>>> the release started.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -David
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
>> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
>> short
>> >>>> this
>> >>>>>> week...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >>>>>> strub
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >>>>>>> Cc:
>> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Lol
>> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
>> >>> fixes
>> >>>>>> but
>> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> a écrit :
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> -David
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Jean-Louis
>
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a
release or always for a bug to fix.
We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if we
identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to
release more than once a year.

So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully
fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do.

For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we
did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out.

Any thoughts/objections?

JLouis


2013/11/6 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>

> On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the
> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from their
> product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.  Seems
> there cutoff is Friday.
>
> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two
> releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA
> 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.
>
>
> -David
>
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression
> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps which
> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently
> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
> >
> >
> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>
> >>
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> Still there at least for the moment lol
> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain
> but
> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot
> >> Jean Louis
> >>
> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >>
> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it
> needs
> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> misunderstand).
> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But
> I
> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
> :)  I
> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
> >>> get
> >>>> the release started.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -David
> >>>>
> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >>>>>> Should be really easy.
> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
> short
> >>>> this
> >>>>>> week...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>>>>>> Cc:
> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Lol
> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
> >>> fixes
> >>>>>> but
> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> a écrit :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>


-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.

On the OPENJPA-2335 note.   Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from their product unless they get a release.  They've been asking since July.  Seems there cutoff is Friday.

Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two releases.  One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA 2.3.0 is released.  Then there's no need to rush.


-David

On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:

> 
> 
> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps which run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. 
> 
> 
> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> 
>> 
>> Hey,
>> 
>> Still there at least for the moment lol
>> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain but
>> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
>> start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> 
>> Thanks a lot
>> Jean Louis
>> 
>> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> 
>>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it needs
>>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt misunderstand).
>>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But I
>>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue :)  I
>>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>>>> 
>>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
>>> get
>>>> the release started.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -David
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>>>>>> Should be really easy.
>>>>>> Anyone likes to take over?
>>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short
>>>> this
>>>>>> week...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Lol
>>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
>>> fixes
>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

the Instance issue is not yet fixed/committed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-912
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/6 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks Mark.
> What about OWB, can I give it a try to roll the 1.2.1?
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/6 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>>
>>
>> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression which
>> is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps which run
>> fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently failing
>> of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>>
>>
>> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >
>> >
>> >Hey,
>> >
>> >Still there at least for the moment lol
>> >Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain but
>> >we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
>> >start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>> >
>> >Thanks a lot
>> >Jean Louis
>> >
>> >Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>> >
>> >> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it
>> needs
>> >> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
>> misunderstand).
>> >> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>> >>
>> >> > Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But
>> I
>> >> > also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
>> :)  I
>> >> > suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >> >
>> >> > If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
>> >> get
>> >> > the release started.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > -David
>> >> >
>> >> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Hi,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Jean-Louis
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> >> > >> Should be really easy.
>> >> > >> Anyone likes to take over?
>> >> > >> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
>> short
>> >> > this
>> >> > >> week...
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> LieGrue,
>> >> > >> strub
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >> > >>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >> > >>> Cc:
>> >> > >>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> >> > >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Lol
>> >> > >>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
>> >> fixes
>> >> > >> but
>> >> > >>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> > >>> a écrit :
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> -David
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Jean-Louis
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

Thanks Mark.
What about OWB, can I give it a try to roll the 1.2.1?

JLouis


2013/11/6 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>

>
>
> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression which
> is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps which run
> fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently failing
> of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa.
>
>
> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >
> >
> >Hey,
> >
> >Still there at least for the moment lol
> >Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain but
> >we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
> >start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
> >
> >Thanks a lot
> >Jean Louis
> >
> >Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> >> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it
> needs
> >> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt
> misunderstand).
> >> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >>
> >> > Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But
> I
> >> > also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue
> :)  I
> >> > suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >> >
> >> > If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
> >> get
> >> > the release started.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -David
> >> >
> >> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >> > >
> >> > > Jean-Louis
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> > >
> >> > >> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >> > >> Should be really easy.
> >> > >> Anyone likes to take over?
> >> > >> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit
> short
> >> > this
> >> > >> week...
> >> > >>
> >> > >> LieGrue,
> >> > >> strub
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >> > >>> Cc:
> >> > >>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >> > >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Lol
> >> > >>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
> >> fixes
> >> > >> but
> >> > >>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> a écrit :
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> -David
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Jean-Louis
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.


Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps which run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. 


I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX.

LieGrue,
strub





>________________________________
> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
>Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49
>Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> 
>
>Hey,
>
>Still there at least for the moment lol
>Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain but
>we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
>start the release today and have binaries for vote today.
>
>Thanks a lot
>Jean Louis
>
>Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it needs
>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt misunderstand).
>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> > Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But I
>> > also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue :)  I
>> > suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>> >
>> > If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
>> get
>> > the release started.
>> >
>> >
>> > -David
>> >
>> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Ok lemme at least try this morning.
>> > >
>> > > Jean-Louis
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> > >
>> > >> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> > >> Should be really easy.
>> > >> Anyone likes to take over?
>> > >> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short
>> > this
>> > >> week...
>> > >>
>> > >> LieGrue,
>> > >> strub
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> > >>> Cc:
>> > >>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>> > >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Lol
>> > >>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
>> fixes
>> > >> but
>> > >>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> a écrit :
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> -David
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jean-Louis
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

Hey,

Still there at least for the moment lol
Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain but
we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
start the release today and have binaries for vote today.

Thanks a lot
Jean Louis
Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it needs
> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt misunderstand).
> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But I
> > also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue :)  I
> > suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >
> > If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
> get
> > the release started.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> > >
> > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >
> > >> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> > >> Should be really easy.
> > >> Anyone likes to take over?
> > >> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short
> > this
> > >> week...
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>> Cc:
> > >>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> > >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>
> > >>> Lol
> > >>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
> fixes
> > >> but
> > >>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> > >>>
> > >>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> > >>> a écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -David
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it needs
some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt misunderstand).
This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But I
> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue :)  I
> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
>
> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to get
> the release started.
>
>
> -David
>
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> >
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >
> >> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> >> Should be really easy.
> >> Anyone likes to take over?
> >> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short
> this
> >> week...
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> Cc:
> >>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >>>
> >>> Lol
> >>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some fixes
> >> but
> >>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> >>>
> >>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> >>> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -David
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
>
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.

Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But I also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue :)  I suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)

If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to get the release started.


-David

On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> 
> Jean-Louis
> 
> 
> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> 
>> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
>> Should be really easy.
>> Anyone likes to take over?
>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short this
>> week...
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
>>> 
>>> Lol
>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some fixes
>> but
>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
>>> 
>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
>>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -David
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

Hi,

Ok lemme at least try this morning.

Jean-Louis


2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>

> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> Should be really easy.
> Anyone likes to take over?
> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short this
> week...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> > Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> >
> > Lol
> > I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some fixes
> but
> > I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> >
> > Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> >>  Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> >>
> >>
> >>  -David
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.

We should fix the session destroy issue first.
Should be really easy.
Anyone likes to take over?
I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short this week...

LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> 
> Lol
> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some fixes but
> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> 
> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> 
> a écrit :
> 
>>  Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>> 
>> 
>>  -David
>> 
>> 
>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.

Lol
I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some fixes but
I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
>
>
> -David
>
>