JDK 1.4 compatibility

[Guy Pardon <gu...@atomikos.com>]

Hi,

We might want to use SDO instead of JAXB for the XML to Java  
conversion. Since SDO is 1.4 compatible I was hoping that the  
resulting SOAP stack would also be JDK1.4.

Is this correct?

Thanks,
Guy

Re: JDK 1.4 compatibility

[Guy Pardon <gu...@atomikos.com>]

Thanks, no problem;-)

I think SDO could be nice, assuming that there is no interference  
with the normal CXF stack (is this the case?).

If we can access the XML stream then it should be OK. JDK 1.4 is nice  
to have but not essential...

Guy

On 26-mrt-07, at 18:16, Dan Diephouse wrote:

> Unfortunately no. The CXF core module is still written in Java5.
>
> Have you thought about using retrotranslator? Retrotranslator + SDO  
> might
> make an OK solution.
>
> http://retrotranslator.sourceforge.net/
>
> - Dan
>
> On 3/26/07, Guy Pardon <gu...@atomikos.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We might want to use SDO instead of JAXB for the XML to Java
>> conversion. Since SDO is 1.4 compatible I was hoping that the
>> resulting SOAP stack would also be JDK1.4.
>>
>> Is this correct?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guy
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Re: JDK 1.4 compatibility

[Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>]

Unfortunately no. The CXF core module is still written in Java5.

Have you thought about using retrotranslator? Retrotranslator + SDO might
make an OK solution.

http://retrotranslator.sourceforge.net/

- Dan

On 3/26/07, Guy Pardon <gu...@atomikos.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We might want to use SDO instead of JAXB for the XML to Java
> conversion. Since SDO is 1.4 compatible I was hoping that the
> resulting SOAP stack would also be JDK1.4.
>
> Is this correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Guy
>



-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog