You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/13 16:44:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (IO-546) ClosedOutputStream#flush should throw

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16203826#comment-16203826 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IO-546:
-----------------------------------

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/42


> ClosedOutputStream#flush should throw
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IO-546
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-546
>             Project: Commons IO
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Streams/Writers
>            Reporter: Tomas Celaya
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: IO-546.patch
>
>
> While debugging an issue involving usage of {{CloseShieldOutputStream}} I discovered that {{ClosedOutputStream#flush}} is not overridden and will silently succeed. Not sure how much of a breaking change this might be but I think it makes more sense for {{ClosedOutputStream#flush}} to throw. This is only really meaningful in contexts where multiple streams are being chained together and some of the streams before {{CloseShieldOutputStream}} perform buffering, but it would make behavior more consistent for these more complex use-cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)