Re: status 4.0 svn part

[Thomas Vandahl <tv...@apache.org>]

Thomas Fischer wrote:
> The following needs to be done

I'd suggest to copy the village part over as well. It would be easier to
integrate then. I'd like to fix the long-standing blob-NPE with oracle.
Should I do this in the old area or in the new one?

Bye, Thomas.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org

Re: status 4.0 svn part

[Thomas Fischer <tf...@apache.org>]

> I'd suggest to copy the village part over as well. It would be easier to
> integrate then. I'd like to fix the long-standing blob-NPE with oracle.
> Should I do this in the old area or in the new one?

For my part, I'd say in the old part. The reasoning is this:

We like to get Torque 4 out without village. So why do we need to put more 
work in ? we can just treat it as external dependency in the torque 4 
part.

If, on the other hand, we do fixes on 3.3, this should be done in 
the old 3.3 part.

Just my personal opinion, feel free to do it otherwise.

     Thomas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org