You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by m....@gmail.com on 2006/11/02 06:39:31 UTC
Re[4]: why this spam has a negative score?
I edit my setting to:
whitelist_from_rcvd * fw.muvalmez.cz
the spam with negative score is coming through spamassassin again
Return-Path: <ky...@muvalmez.cz>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on fw.muvalmez.cz
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-80.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO,
DC_IMAGE_SPAM_HTML,DC_IMAGE_SPAM_TEXT,DC_IMG_HTML_RATIO,
DC_IMG_TEXT_RATIO,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_90_100,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,MY_CID_AND_CLOSING,MY_CID_AND_STYLE,
SARE_GIF_ATTACH,SARE_GIF_STOX,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=no version=3.1.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Original-To: kys@muvalmez.cz
Received: from tm.net.my (unknown [219.95.18.47])
by fw.muvalmez.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3292C0EB
for <ky...@muvalmez.cz>; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:25:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailin.webmailer.de (port=1513 helo=ctwumfepkgu)
by tm.net.my with smtp
id 1856q-VwQ6-2u
for kys@muvalmez.cz; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:25:34 +0800
Message-ID: <00...@ctwumfepkgu>
From: "Curtis Lopez" <pa...@stb-finger.de>
To: kys@muvalmez.cz
Subject: high priest representative on Askone invent them.
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:25:34 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Security: MIME headers sanitized on fw.muvalmez.cz
See http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/sanitizer-intro.html
for details. $Revision: 1.139 $Date: 2003-09-07 10:14:23-07
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C6FDDA.B2AB33A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Virus-Status: No
X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.3 with clamscan / ClamAV 0.88.4/2137/Wed Nov 1 09:39:47 2006
Status:
X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 7.5.427 [268.13.21/510]
--
S pozdravem,
m.donicova@gmail.com
mailto:m.donicova@gmail.com
Re: why this spam has a negative score?
Posted by Alan Premselaar <al...@12inch.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
m.donicova@gmail.com wrote:
> I edit my setting to:
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd * fw.muvalmez.cz
>
> the spam with negative score is coming through spamassassin again
>
> Return-Path: <ky...@muvalmez.cz>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on fw.muvalmez.cz
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-80.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO,
> DC_IMAGE_SPAM_HTML,DC_IMAGE_SPAM_TEXT,DC_IMG_HTML_RATIO,
> DC_IMG_TEXT_RATIO,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_90_100,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,
> HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,MY_CID_AND_CLOSING,MY_CID_AND_STYLE,
> SARE_GIF_ATTACH,SARE_GIF_STOX,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_WHITELIST
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You don't happen to have *@muvalmez.cz in your whitelist do you?
Alan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFSYrvE2gsBSKjZHQRAuIyAKDsNuKCRJF1cediMAhFrlj/EPTuuwCgg1si
//6OQ9JjPbissU9bTrm/8lI=
=CRaS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----