You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by Daniel Gaddis <Da...@tlc.state.tx.us> on 2007/02/28 17:12:05 UTC
[users@httpd] Have you ever seen/resolved an issue with partial/incomplete apache access log entries?
Have you ever seen/resolved an issue with partial/incomplete apache
access log entries?
The middle entry below is an example of a partial/incomplete entry from
one of my web logs for yesterday...
75.53.37.148 - - [27/Feb/2007:11:30:03 -0600] "GET /favicon.ico
HTTP/1.1" 404 217
TP/1.1" 304 -
68.203.146.20 - - [27/Feb/2007:11:30:03 -0600] "GET
/graphics/senate/ltgovBtn.gif HTTP/1.1" 304 -
The following is all of the partial/incomplete entries for yesterday...
r16pt.gif HTTP/1.1" 304 -
/1.1" 200 5972
200 885
" 200 1934
tn.gif HTTP/1.1" 200 1938
0 46555
0
TP/1.1" 304 -
0 1994
P/1.1" 304 -
0" 200 1589
3325
200 7125
11921
P/1.1" 304 -
TP/1.1" 200 15008
1" 304 -
809
Gif HTTP/1.0" 200 2222
me_a.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 17327
tno.gif HTTP/1.1" 304 -
Btn.gif HTTP/1.1" 304 -
124144
pg HTTP/1.1" 200 11842
TTP/1.0" 304 -
" 200 5972
s HTTP/1.1" 200 15779
-
84
.1" 304 -
.1" 200 935
2/home_a.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 19152
1073
00 1978
P/1.1" 304 -
s HTTP/1.1" 200 12799
I'm running Apache 1.3.37 on Windows 2000 with Service Pack 4.
Thanks,
Daniel
Re: [users@httpd] RE: Compatible version on Apache, Tomcat and Openssl?
Posted by Davide Bianchi <da...@onlyforfun.net>.
On 03/02/2007 03:56 PM, Lisa Tan wrote:
> Do you know which mod_jk I should use? Mod_jk or mod_jk2?
mod_jk2 is no longer developed, use mod_jk.
Davide
--
[It] contains "vegetable stabilizer" which sounds ominous. How unstable
are vegetables? --Jeff Zahn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
RE: [users@httpd] RE: Compatible version on Apache, Tomcat and Openssl?
Posted by Lisa Tan <ag...@wayne.edu>.
Do you know which mod_jk I should use? Mod_jk or mod_jk2?
Thanks.
_____
From: 黄叶 [mailto:hylinux@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 9:34 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org; ag5087@wayne.edu
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] RE: Compatible version on Apache, Tomcat and
Openssl?
may be you install openssl at first. I think the version is 0.9.8a or ( more
than 0.9.7, may be is better)
and now, you can install apache
then tomcat.
if you want apache + tomcat,
I think you must install mod_jk
2007/3/2, Lisa Tan <ag...@wayne.edu>:
I am a newbie on all the apps. I am trying to test Shibboleth app but need
these three apps to be installed before I installed Shibboleth.
At first I had a hard time to configure Apache 2.2.4 and Tomcat 5.5.20 but
they are working now. When I tried to add Openssl 0.9.7.h, Apache is not
working. I tried Apache 2.0.59. The installation went smooth.
Now I need to find configuration steps for Apache 2.0.59, Tomcat 5.5.20 and
Openssl. Before I do that, I'd like to get help from this group to see if
the app versions are compatible?
I would appreciate if anyone could give me step by step docs on the
configuration. Thanks,
Lisa Tan, Lead Systems Integrator
eServices & Strategic Technologies
Computing & Information Technology
Wayne State University
5925 Woodward Ave. Rm# 313
Detroit, MI 48202
Phone: 313-577-2561
Fax: 313-577-0431
Email: ag5087@wayne.edu
Re: [users@httpd] RE: Compatible version on Apache, Tomcat and Openssl?
Posted by 黄叶 <hy...@gmail.com>.
may be you install openssl at first. I think the version is 0.9.8a or ( more
than 0.9.7, may be is better)
and now, you can install apache
then tomcat.
if you want apache + tomcat,
I think you must install mod_jk
2007/3/2, Lisa Tan <ag...@wayne.edu>:
>
> I am a newbie on all the apps. I am trying to test Shibboleth app but
> need these three apps to be installed before I installed Shibboleth.
>
>
>
> At first I had a hard time to configure Apache 2.2.4 and Tomcat 5.5.20 but
> they are working now. When I tried to add Openssl 0.9.7.h, Apache is not
> working. I tried Apache 2.0.59. The installation went smooth.
>
>
>
> Now I need to find configuration steps for Apache 2.0.59, Tomcat 5.5.20and Openssl. Before I do that, I'd like to get help from this group to see
> if the app versions are compatible?
>
>
>
> I would appreciate if anyone could give me step by step docs on the
> configuration. Thanks,
>
>
>
> Lisa Tan, Lead Systems Integrator
>
> eServices & Strategic Technologies
>
> Computing & Information Technology
>
> Wayne State University
>
> 5925 Woodward Ave. Rm# 313
>
> Detroit, MI 48202
>
> Phone: 313-577-2561
>
> Fax: 313-577-0431
>
> Email: ag5087@wayne.edu
>
[users@httpd] RE: Compatible version on Apache, Tomcat and Openssl?
Posted by Lisa Tan <ag...@wayne.edu>.
I am a newbie on all the apps. I am trying to test Shibboleth app but need
these three apps to be installed before I installed Shibboleth.
At first I had a hard time to configure Apache 2.2.4 and Tomcat 5.5.20 but
they are working now. When I tried to add Openssl 0.9.7.h, Apache is not
working. I tried Apache 2.0.59. The installation went smooth.
Now I need to find configuration steps for Apache 2.0.59, Tomcat 5.5.20 and
Openssl. Before I do that, I'd like to get help from this group to see if
the app versions are compatible?
I would appreciate if anyone could give me step by step docs on the
configuration. Thanks,
Lisa Tan, Lead Systems Integrator
eServices & Strategic Technologies
Computing & Information Technology
Wayne State University
5925 Woodward Ave. Rm# 313
Detroit, MI 48202
Phone: 313-577-2561
Fax: 313-577-0431
Email: ag5087@wayne.edu
RE: [users@httpd] Have you ever seen/resolved an issue with partial/incomplete apache access log entries?
Posted by "Gonzalez, Miguel" <mi...@threespot.com>.
From: Daniel Gaddis [mailto:Daniel.Gaddis@tlc.state.tx.us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:12 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [users@httpd] Have you ever seen/resolved an issue with
partial/incomplete apache access log entries?
Have you ever seen/resolved an issue with partial/incomplete apache
access log entries?
The middle entry below is an example of a partial/incomplete entry from
one of my web logs for yesterday...
75.53.37.148 - - [27/Feb/2007:11:30:03 -0600] "GET /favicon.ico
HTTP/1.1" 404 217
TP/1.1" 304 -
68.203.146.20 - - [27/Feb/2007:11:30:03 -0600] "GET
/graphics/senate/ltgovBtn.gif HTTP/1.1" 304 -
Hi, Have you checked the other logs? Error log? Also you can set the
level of logging, probably you have it write now set it up to warn,
probably debug or something similar could give you more information
Miguel