You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com> on 2019/01/08 16:25:41 UTC
Building with Java 11
Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our build
to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a branch
which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can.
My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and broadly
speaking, adds these modules:
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
<version>2.3.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
<version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
<version>2.3.1</version>
<type>pom</type>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>rt</artifactId>
<version>2.3.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
<artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
<version>1.2.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
<artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId>
<version>1.2.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jacorb</groupId>
<artifactId>jacorb</artifactId>
<version>3.9</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId>
<artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.0.6.Final</version>
</dependency>
There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in the
output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is getting
almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to pass.
Here's my current failures:
https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included are:
FastInfoSet-1.2.15
gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001
ha-api-3.1.9
istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7
jacorb-3.9
jacorb-omgapi-3.9
javax.activation-1.2.0
javax.activation-api-1.2.0
javax.annotation-api-1.3.2
javax.jws-api-1.1
javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0
jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438
jaxws-api
jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec
management-api-3.0.0-b012
mimepull-1.9.10
policy-2.7.5
rt-2.3.1
saaj-impl-1.5.0
stax-ex-1.8
stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4)
streambuffer-1.5.6
txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438
woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3)
xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3)
These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of
dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be removed, but
I'll need to work through them to figure out what.
If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most welcome.
Thanks
Jon
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Merged, thanks :)
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Jon,
>
> just to keep the branch sync with master.
> https://github.com/jgallimore/tomee/pull/4
>
> Thank you.
>
> Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 00:09, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
> escreveu:
>
> > So I have a fix for the cdi-tomee tck which means we can add cxf 3.3.0
> back
> > in. I just want to wait for full tests to complete before explaining in
> > detail but to sum it up the bug was in testng which was keeping hold of
> > threads.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>.
Hey Jon,
just to keep the branch sync with master.
https://github.com/jgallimore/tomee/pull/4
Thank you.
Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 00:09, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
escreveu:
> So I have a fix for the cdi-tomee tck which means we can add cxf 3.3.0 back
> in. I just want to wait for full tests to complete before explaining in
> detail but to sum it up the bug was in testng which was keeping hold of
> threads.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
So I have a fix for the cdi-tomee tck which means we can add cxf 3.3.0 back
in. I just want to wait for full tests to complete before explaining in
detail but to sum it up the bug was in testng which was keeping hold of
threads.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Yep, done. Thanks!
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, 11:51 Daniel Cunha, <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Jon,
>
> Can you review it: https://github.com/jgallimore/tomee/pull/3
>
> Em sáb, 2 de mar de 2019 às 08:50, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> escreveu:
>
> > I'm able to build tomee + tests locally with Java 11:
> > mvn clean install -Pquick
> >
> > Running now full:
> > mvn clean install
> >
> > Em sáb, 2 de mar de 2019 às 04:25, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> > escreveu:
> >
> >> Seems that we need dependencies update on mockito module.
> >> I was getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError for JAXB class and some
> >> error on Mockito API.
> >>
> >> Em sex, 1 de mar de 2019 às 18:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >>
> >>> Definitely slow - same issue as master on the CI by the look of it.
> >>>
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:23 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Do you have any idea if you J11 branch build is slow vs normal just
> >>> yet?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Sent from:
> >>> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> >> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
@Jon,
Can you review it: https://github.com/jgallimore/tomee/pull/3
Em sáb, 2 de mar de 2019 às 08:50, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
escreveu:
> I'm able to build tomee + tests locally with Java 11:
> mvn clean install -Pquick
>
> Running now full:
> mvn clean install
>
> Em sáb, 2 de mar de 2019 às 04:25, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> escreveu:
>
>> Seems that we need dependencies update on mockito module.
>> I was getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError for JAXB class and some
>> error on Mockito API.
>>
>> Em sex, 1 de mar de 2019 às 18:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Definitely slow - same issue as master on the CI by the look of it.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:23 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Do you have any idea if you J11 branch build is slow vs normal just
>>> yet?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Sent from:
>>> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
I'm able to build tomee + tests locally with Java 11:
mvn clean install -Pquick
Running now full:
mvn clean install
Em sáb, 2 de mar de 2019 às 04:25, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
escreveu:
> Seems that we need dependencies update on mockito module.
> I was getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError for JAXB class and some error
> on Mockito API.
>
> Em sex, 1 de mar de 2019 às 18:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Definitely slow - same issue as master on the CI by the look of it.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:23 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Do you have any idea if you J11 branch build is slow vs normal just yet?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from:
>> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Seems that we need dependencies update on mockito module.
I was getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError for JAXB class and some error
on Mockito API.
Em sex, 1 de mar de 2019 às 18:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Definitely slow - same issue as master on the CI by the look of it.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:23 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>
> > Do you have any idea if you J11 branch build is slow vs normal just yet?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Definitely slow - same issue as master on the CI by the look of it.
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:23 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> Do you have any idea if you J11 branch build is slow vs normal just yet?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Do you have any idea if you J11 branch build is slow vs normal just yet?
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Started a new thread for slowness... the warnings are out of memory.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
That makes sense, just didn't want to confuse the j11 branch test failures vs
what could be causing the slowness.
I'm seeing those same warnings now locally so I can try and dig deeper here.
:)
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
The build of the java11-experimentation branch (on Java 8) is running on a
box here in my office. "Normally" a build of master on that box takes ~ 2
to 2.5 hours. The failures I listed are for that build.
The build on the Apache CI is master. Recent builds on that node seem to be
the same length of time - a couple of hours.
Let's see where we are when these are done. Certainly seeing stuff like
WARNING: 2ef75bcd694868d71565ceb30277c45c162cb6.war was not deployed
Mar 01, 2019 8:20:05 PM org.jboss.cdi.tck.shrinkwrap.ArchiveBuilder build
INFO: Test archive built [info:
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.builtin.metadata.broken.typeparam.interceptor.InterceptedBeanTypeParamInitializerTest,
time: 38 ms]
Mar 01, 2019 8:20:05 PM org.apache.openejb.client.EventLogger log
INFO: RemoteInitialContextCreated{providerUri=
http://localhost:40707/tomee/ejb}
Mar 01, 2019 8:22:57 PM org.apache.openejb.client.EventLogger log
WARNING: RequestFailed{server=http://localhost:40707/tomee/ejb}
JNDI_LOOKUP:/openejb/DeployerBusinessRemote {error=Cannot open object input
stream to server (OEJP/4.6) : null}
Mar 01, 2019 8:22:57 PM
org.jboss.cdi.tck.impl.testng.ProgressLoggingTestListener beforeInvocation
INFO: Invoke InterceptedBeanTypeParamInitializerTest.testDeploymentFails:
864/1,571 Failed tests: 0 (348)
Mar 01, 2019 8:22:57 PM org.apache.openejb.arquillian.common.TomEEContainer
undeploy
Even if it isn't being presented as a test failure, makes me think
something isn't right.
This isn't happening on the master build on the CI.
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:45 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> PR409 was the merge that was first seen being slow.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
PR409 was the merge that was first seen being slow.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
For PR 419 and 409 all the full tests pass too.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
I already updated all the JAXB related artifacts to 2.3.1 which comes with
CXF 3.3.0 too. I already added all the transitive dependency exclusions.
Your extra ones could just be added on top of that.
The work is in PR 419 which was already reviewed and approved. It would be
great to have that merged and save other people overlapping some of the same
work. (Along with #409 for CXF 3.3.0 itself)
Do you see any issues with merging those?
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi Jon,
could not we move your branch to apache/tomee repository?
What you guys think about it?
Em qua, 9 de jan de 2019 às 09:40, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
> Great job Jon.
> I did some tests so, so we should be able to get something green hopefully
> soon
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:17 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > fantastic! I'll take a look on it.
> >
> > Nice work!
> >
> > Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 13:26, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> > > Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our
> build
> > > to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a
> branch
> > > which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can.
> > >
> > > My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and broadly
> > > speaking, adds these modules:
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.3.0</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > > <type>pom</type>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>rt</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.jacorb</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jacorb</artifactId>
> > > <version>3.9</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.0.6.Final</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in the
> > > output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is
> getting
> > > almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to pass.
> > > Here's my current failures:
> > > https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
> > >
> > > In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included are:
> > >
> > > FastInfoSet-1.2.15
> > > gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001
> > > ha-api-3.1.9
> > > istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7
> > > jacorb-3.9
> > > jacorb-omgapi-3.9
> > > javax.activation-1.2.0
> > > javax.activation-api-1.2.0
> > > javax.annotation-api-1.3.2
> > > javax.jws-api-1.1
> > > javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0
> > > jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > > jaxws-api
> > > jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec
> > > management-api-3.0.0-b012
> > > mimepull-1.9.10
> > > policy-2.7.5
> > > rt-2.3.1
> > > saaj-impl-1.5.0
> > > stax-ex-1.8
> > > stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4)
> > > streambuffer-1.5.6
> > > txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > > woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3)
> > > xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3)
> > >
> > > These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of
> > > dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be removed,
> > but
> > > I'll need to work through them to figure out what.
> > >
> > > If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most
> > welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by César Hernández Mendoza <ce...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
the last build Jonathan started is still running after 3hrs. 30 min:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
Can some committer please trigger a build for master branch to compare and
check James observation?
El vie., 1 mar. 2019 a las 14:39, j4fm (<ja...@my-managed.net>)
escribió:
> Thanks Jon, so it wasn't frozen (impatient me) - just mid-test but running
> like someone stole it's ponies.
>
> Once it finishes I will check the stats, but did you see slowness happen
> before... could it be busy infra?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Atentamente:
César Hernández Mendoza.
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Thanks Jon, so it wasn't frozen (impatient me) - just mid-test but running
like someone stole it's ponies.
Once it finishes I will check the stats, but did you see slowness happen
before... could it be busy infra?
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
ok..
I'm still blocked with that:
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by
org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
(file:/tmp/temp7398740719212351046dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of
org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal
reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because module
java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module @15975490
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkAccess(AccessibleObject.java:591)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:558)
at
org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath.addJarsToPath(BasicURLClassPath.java:110)
at
org.apache.openejb.loader.ContextClassPath.addJarsToPath(ContextClassPath.java:39)
at org.apache.openejb.server.Main.main(Main.java:126)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at org.apache.openejb.cli.MainImpl.main(MainImpl.java:149)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at org.apache.openejb.cli.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:189)
Apr 04, 2019 10:50:50 AM org.apache.openejb.itest.legacy.LegacyClientTest
test
I tried other way, but still getting issue with my VM crashing.
(asking for help)
Em qua, 27 de mar de 2019 às 11:50, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
escreveu:
> My feedback:
>
> back to working on it, and yes I still have my VM crashing in some modules.
> I've all changes from master merged and which include your changes James.
> So, my conclusion is: My changes on TomEE classlaoders break all.
> Reworking on it.
>
>
> Em qua, 6 de mar de 2019 às 13:31, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
> escreveu:
>
>> You can just grab this file and give it a shot...
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/j4fm/tomee/blob/CXF-3.3.0-Take-2/container/openejb-core/src/main/resources/default.exclusions
>>
>> I haven't quite finalized the tweaks I'm working on but it's pretty much
>> there.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
My feedback:
back to working on it, and yes I still have my VM crashing in some modules.
I've all changes from master merged and which include your changes James.
So, my conclusion is: My changes on TomEE classlaoders break all. Reworking
on it.
Em qua, 6 de mar de 2019 às 13:31, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
escreveu:
> You can just grab this file and give it a shot...
>
>
> https://github.com/j4fm/tomee/blob/CXF-3.3.0-Take-2/container/openejb-core/src/main/resources/default.exclusions
>
> I haven't quite finalized the tweaks I'm working on but it's pretty much
> there.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
You can just grab this file and give it a shot...
https://github.com/j4fm/tomee/blob/CXF-3.3.0-Take-2/container/openejb-core/src/main/resources/default.exclusions
I haven't quite finalized the tweaks I'm working on but it's pretty much
there.
Thanks
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi James,
Thanks! I'll try it.
Em qua, 6 de mar de 2019 às 13:14, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
escreveu:
> FYI, onyl loosely related but as part of fixing the CDI TCK memory gobbling
> with CXF 3.3.0, I've added quite a few to the default.exclusions for
> scanning.
>
> I also noticed the lib we have is woodstox-core-5.x.x.jar but in
> default.exclusions we have woodstox-core-asl-x.x.x.jar.
>
> This may avoid your woodstox scanning issue below (but not avoid why it
> cannot be scanned - does it need to be?)
>
> So I altered that one and some other things. All passes on JDK 8
> succeeded.
>
> So if you want to try with my new default.exclusions file, let me know I
> will add a PR for you to pull. I've added some extra unneeded MP libs too.
>
> Hope this helps you :)
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
FYI, onyl loosely related but as part of fixing the CDI TCK memory gobbling
with CXF 3.3.0, I've added quite a few to the default.exclusions for
scanning.
I also noticed the lib we have is woodstox-core-5.x.x.jar but in
default.exclusions we have woodstox-core-asl-x.x.x.jar.
This may avoid your woodstox scanning issue below (but not avoid why it
cannot be scanned - does it need to be?)
So I altered that one and some other things. All passes on JDK 8 succeeded.
So if you want to try with my new default.exclusions file, let me know I
will add a PR for you to pull. I've added some extra unneeded MP libs too.
Hope this helps you :)
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Well, my changes is just to try test a different way/behavior about the
which Otávio saw during his itest build. Since it is caused on Basic
URLClassLoader, it would affect a lot of place in TomEE.
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/SystemInstance.java#L118
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/ClassPathFactory.java
I did stupid change, which for sure is not the fix for it, but just to try
see another behavior over it. (
https://github.com/danielsoro/tomee/tree/j11-tests)
Some additionals. For sure, seems that I broken the classloader in many
places:
WARNING - Failed to scan
[file:/home/soro/git/apache/tomee/tomee/tomee-embedded/target/woodstox-core-5.0.3.jar]
from classloader hierarchy
java.io.IOException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.compat.Jre9Compat.jarFileNewInstance(Jre9Compat.java:212)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.JarFileUrlJar.<init>(JarFileUrlJar.java:65)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.JarFactory.newInstance(JarFactory.java:49)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.process(StandardJarScanner.java:374)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.processURLs(StandardJarScanner.java:309)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.doScanClassPath(StandardJarScanner.java:278)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.scan(StandardJarScanner.java:229)
at org.apache.tomee.loader.TomEEJarScanner.scan(TomEEJarScanner.java:69)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.TldScanner.scanJars(TldScanner.java:262)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.TldScanner.scan(TldScanner.java:104)
at
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JasperInitializer.onStartup(JasperInitializer.java:83)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.startInternal(StandardContext.java:5098)
at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.start(LifecycleBase.java:183)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:743)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:719)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:703)
at
org.apache.tomee.catalina.TomcatWebAppBuilder.deployWar(TomcatWebAppBuilder.java:657)
at
org.apache.tomee.catalina.TomcatWebAppBuilder.deployWebApps(TomcatWebAppBuilder.java:595)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:1048)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:758)
at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deploy(Container.java:350)
at
org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deployPathsAsWebapp(Container.java:230)
at
org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deployPathsAsWebapp(Container.java:225)
at
org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deployPathsAsWebapp(Container.java:218)
at
org.apache.tomee.security.AbstractTomEESecurityTest.setUp(AbstractTomEESecurityTest.java:37)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:379)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:340)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:125)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:413)
I also see it happening a lot of time (not sure if caused by my changes,
but still investigating):
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to initialize agent
at
org.apache.openejb.javaagent.Agent.checkInitialization(Agent.java:104)
at org.apache.openejb.javaagent.Agent.getInstrumentation(Agent.java:94)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler$PersistenceClassLoaderHandlerImpl.addTransformer(Assembler.java:3780)
at
org.apache.openejb.persistence.PersistenceUnitInfoImpl.addTransformer(PersistenceUnitInfoImpl.java:337)
at
org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceProviderImpl.createContainerEntityManagerFactory(PersistenceProviderImpl.java:170)
at
org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceProviderImpl.createContainerEntityManagerFactory(PersistenceProviderImpl.java:63)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.EntityManagerFactoryCallable.call(EntityManagerFactoryCallable.java:112)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.ReloadableEntityManagerFactory.createDelegate(ReloadableEntityManagerFactory.java:134)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.ReloadableEntityManagerFactory.<init>(ReloadableEntityManagerFactory.java:105)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.PersistenceBuilder.createEntityManagerFactory(PersistenceBuilder.java:157)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:918)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:758)
at
org.apache.openejb.OpenEjbContainer$Provider.createAppContext(OpenEjbContainer.java:434)
at
org.apache.openejb.OpenEjbContainer$Provider.createEJBContainer(OpenEjbContainer.java:282)
at
javax.ejb.embeddable.EJBContainer.createEJBContainer(EJBContainer.java:56)
at org.superbiz.injection.jpa.MoviesTest.test(MoviesTest.java:42)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at org.apache.openejb.javaagent.Agent.dynamicLoadAgent(Agent.java:151)
at
org.apache.openejb.javaagent.Agent.checkInitialization(Agent.java:102)
... 44 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Can not attach to current VM
at
jdk.attach/sun.tools.attach.HotSpotVirtualMachine.<init>(HotSpotVirtualMachine.java:75)
at
jdk.attach/sun.tools.attach.VirtualMachineImpl.<init>(VirtualMachineImpl.java:57)
at
jdk.attach/sun.tools.attach.AttachProviderImpl.attachVirtualMachine(AttachProviderImpl.java:58)
at
jdk.attach/com.sun.tools.attach.VirtualMachine.attach(VirtualMachine.java:207)
... 50 more
INFO - JAVA AGENT NOT INSTALLED. The JPA Persistence Provider requested
installation of a ClassFileTransformer which requires a JavaAgent. See
http://tomee.apache.org/javaagent.html
For modules failure (like tck/cdi-tomee, tck/cdi-embedded,
arquillian/arquillian-tomee-tests/arquillian-tomee-jaxws-tests and etc):
# Created on 2019-03-06T11:51:33.507
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Ignoring option PermSize; support was
removed in 8.0
# Created on 2019-03-06T11:51:33.507
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Ignoring option MaxPermSize; support was
removed in 8.0
# Created on 2019-03-06T11:51:33.507
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Option UseConcMarkSweepGC was deprecated
in version 9.0 and will likely be removed in a future release.
# Created on 2019-03-06T11:51:33.507
Unrecognized VM option 'CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled'
# Created on 2019-03-06T11:51:33.508
Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
# Created on 2019-03-06T11:51:33.508
Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
Which means that my VM just crashed during the build! Which could also
caused by my changes.
Em qua, 6 de mar de 2019 às 12:38, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
escreveu:
> Hi folks,
>
> I spent my night trying make the build happy with Java 11.
> It is what I have for now:
>
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache OpenEJB 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache OpenEJB ..................................... SUCCESS [
> 1.079 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container ............................... SUCCESS [
> 0.035 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Loader ..................... SUCCESS [
> 21.312 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: MBean Annotation API ....... SUCCESS [
> 0.130 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: JPA Integration ............ SUCCESS [
> 0.614 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: API ........................ SUCCESS [
> 0.183 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Java Agent ................. SUCCESS [
> 0.162 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Java EE .................... SUCCESS [
> 16.803 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Java EE Accessors .......... SUCCESS [
> 4.027 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests .................................. SUCCESS [
> 0.016 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Beans ......................... SUCCESS [
> 2.016 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Interceptor Beans ............. SUCCESS [
> 0.319 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Servlets ...................... SUCCESS [
> 0.256 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Client ........................ SUCCESS [
> 1.936 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: App ........................... SUCCESS [
> 0.422 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Failover EJB .................. SUCCESS [
> 0.106 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Core ....................... SUCCESS [17:31
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server .................................. SUCCESS [
> 0.017 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Client ........................ SUCCESS [
> 12.072 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Core .......................... SUCCESS [
> 4.368 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Multicast Discovery ........... SUCCESS [
> 29.229 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: EJBd .......................... SUCCESS [01:39
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Hsql .......................... SUCCESS [
> 7.048 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Http .......................... SUCCESS [
> 27.825 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Webservices ................... FAILURE [
> 1.325 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: CXF Transport ................. SUCCESS [
> 0.837 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: CXF ........................... FAILURE [
> 33.957 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: REST .......................... SUCCESS [
> 1.100 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: CXF RS ........................ SUCCESS [02:20
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Daemon ........................ SUCCESS [
> 0.420 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Assembly ................................ SUCCESS [
> 0.013 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Assembly :: Standalone .................. FAILURE [
> 1.447 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent .............. SUCCESS [
> 0.011 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Common .... SUCCESS [
> 0.620 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE ................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.425 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Util ........................... SUCCESS [
> 0.318 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: TomEE Common SUCCESS [
> 1.876 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Failover ...................... SUCCESS [01:21
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Legacy Client ................. SUCCESS [
> 23.118 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Legacy Server ................. SUCCESS [
> 1.236 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Web ........................... SUCCESS [
> 0.219 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Juli ........................... SUCCESS [
> 18.784 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins ........................... SUCCESS [
> 0.184 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: Util ................... SUCCESS [
> 1.204 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Common ......................... SUCCESS [
> 0.499 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Config ......................... SUCCESS [
> 0.354 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Loader ......................... SUCCESS [
> 1.179 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: JDBC ........................... SUCCESS [
> 9.380 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Catalina ....................... SUCCESS [
> 1.262 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MyFaces ........................ SUCCESS [
> 0.485 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Mojarra ........................ SUCCESS [
> 0.681 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: RS Web Services ................ SUCCESS [
> 2.441 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Webapp ......................... SUCCESS [
> 5.723 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Web Services ................... SUCCESS [
> 1.510 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Microprofile JWT ........................ SUCCESS [
> 0.732 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MicroProfile ................... SUCCESS [
> 0.221 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MicroProfile Common ............ SUCCESS [
> 0.728 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Plus Webapp .................... FAILURE [
> 3.269 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils ................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.014 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Core EclipseLink ............... SUCCESS [
> 0.718 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Plume Webapp ................... FAILURE [
> 2.375 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MicroProfile Webapp ............ SUCCESS [
> 3.221 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Apache TomEE ................... SUCCESS [
> 35.881 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: TomEE Maven Plugin ..... SUCCESS [
> 36.853 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: TomEE Embedded ................. FAILURE [
> 52.706 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: LiveReload ..................... SUCCESS [
> 0.264 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: TomEE Embedded Maven Plugin SUCCESS [
> 14.152 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: OpenEJB Embedded Maven Plugin SUCCESS
> [ 2.691 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: TomEE Webapp Archetype . SUCCESS [
> 0.104 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: jars.txt Maven Plugin .. SUCCESS [
> 0.375 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: ApplicationComposer Maven Plugin
> SUCCESS [ 3.752 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Gradle Plugins .......................... SUCCESS [
> 0.028 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Gradle Plugins :: TomEE Embedded ........ SUCCESS [
> 0.186 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: JUnit ...................... SUCCESS [
> 24.370 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: ActiveMQ ...................... SUCCESS [
> 0.377 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Derby Network Service ......... SUCCESS [
> 2.984 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Axis .......................... SUCCESS [
> 2.348 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Common CLI .................... SUCCESS [
> 4.479 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: SSH ........................... SUCCESS [
> 3.674 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: BoneCP ........................ SUCCESS [
> 5.258 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Hessian ....................... SUCCESS [
> 6.856 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @AccessTimeout (Meta) ....... SUCCESS [
> 6.937 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @AccessTimeout .............. SUCCESS [
> 6.766 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Alternate Descriptors ....... SUCCESS [
> 2.523 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Application Composer ........ SUCCESS [
> 1.845 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: ZipLock ... SUCCESS [
> 2.101 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Application Composer, JAX-WS and CDI are in
> a boat SUCCESS [ 2.437 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @ApplicationException inheritance SUCCESS [
> 1.863 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Transaction Provider
> SUCCESS [ 0.252 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Remote .... SUCCESS [
> 12.873 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Arquillian Persistence Extension Sample
> SUCCESS [ 8.340 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Asynchronous Methods ....... SUCCESS [
> 21.744 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Asynchronous @PostConstrct . SUCCESS [
> 11.724 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Bean Validation Design By Contract SUCCESS
> [ 2.004 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Stereotypes ............. SUCCESS [
> 1.960 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Application Scope ....... SUCCESS [
> 1.917 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Basic CDI ................... SUCCESS [
> 1.921 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI, EJBContext and JAAS .... SUCCESS [
> 0.308 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Events .................. SUCCESS [
> 5.981 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Interceptors ............ SUCCESS [
> 2.964 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI-Disposes ................ SUCCESS [
> 1.827 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI-Field Producer .......... SUCCESS [
> 1.790 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Basic Qualifier ............. SUCCESS [
> 1.760 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Realm ................... SUCCESS [
> 5.461 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Request Scope ........... SUCCESS [
> 1.925 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Session Scope ........... SUCCESS [
> 0.427 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Embedded Adaptor SUCCESS [
> 17.973 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Change JAXWS URL ........ SUCCESS [
> 4.130 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: EJB 2.1 Component Interfaces SUCCESS [
> 1.812 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Client Resource Lookup ...... SUCCESS [
> 0.413 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR .. SUCCESS [
> 0.008 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: API SUCCESS [
> 0.101 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: Connector Impl
> SUCCESS [ 0.045 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: RAR Packaging
> SUCCESS [ 0.051 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: Sample WAR
> SUCCESS [ 0.045 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: EAR Packaging
> SUCCESS [ 0.166 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: Functional
> Tests SUCCESS [ 25.056 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in WAR .. SUCCESS [
> 5.857 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Cucumber JVM ................ SUCCESS [
> 2.230 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Expanded support for Env Entries SUCCESS [
> 1.770 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Datasource Ciphered Password SUCCESS [
> 2.284 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Datasource Definition ....... SUCCESS [
> 1.977 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Datasource Versioning ....... SUCCESS [
> 7.670 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Decorators .................. SUCCESS [
> 1.850 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: OpenEJB Container FAILURE
> [ 54.289 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike @ConfigProperty .. SUCCESS [
> 2.819 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike Exception Handling SUCCESS [
> 2.767 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JSF2/CDI/BV/JPA/DeltaSpike .. SUCCESS [
> 6.790 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike I18n ............. SUCCESS [
> 2.812 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic DAO Implementation .. SUCCESS [
> 2.785 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic Datasource Routing .. SUCCESS [
> 2.786 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic Implementation ...... SUCCESS [
> 1.691 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic MBean Proxy ......... SUCCESS [
> 2.184 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Ear Testing ................. SUCCESS [
> 0.004 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Ear Testing :: Business Model SUCCESS [
> 0.019 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Ear Testing :: Business Logic SUCCESS [
> 2.386 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB Examples War ........ SUCCESS [
> 0.070 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB Remote Call ......... SUCCESS [
> 0.050 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB Remote Call ......... SUCCESS [
> 0.051 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService .......... SUCCESS [
> 0.022 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Groovy CDI .................. SUCCESS [
> 2.902 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Groovy JPA .................. SUCCESS [
> 3.638 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Groovy Spock ................ SUCCESS [
> 3.275 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Hello World - Weblogic ...... SUCCESS [
> 1.823 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Resource javax.jms.ConnectionFactory
> SUCCESS [ 2.293 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Resource DataSource Injection SUCCESS [
> 1.954 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @EJB Injection .............. SUCCESS [
> 1.747 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @PersistenceContext EntityManager Injection
> SUCCESS [ 2.487 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Resource env-entry Injection SUCCESS [
> 1.707 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Interceptors ................ SUCCESS [
> 1.093 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JavaMail API ................ SUCCESS [
> 1.871 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JPA with EclipseLink ........ FAILURE [
> 1.660 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Core Hibernate ................. SUCCESS [
> 0.569 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JPA with Hibernate .......... SUCCESS [
> 2.621 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JPA @Enumerated ............. SUCCESS [
> 2.616 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: JSF - ManangedBean and EJB SUCCESS [
> 0.214 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: JSF - CDI and EJB ....... SUCCESS [
> 0.159 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @EJB Lookup ................. SUCCESS [
> 1.744 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: EJB Lookup with descriptor .. SUCCESS [
> 1.871 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MBean Auto Registration ..... FAILURE [
> 1.879 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Movies Complete (Meta) ...... SUCCESS [
> 2.555 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Movies Complete ............. SUCCESS [
> 2.722 s]
> [INFO] MicroProfile :: Examples :: Config ................. SUCCESS [
> 6.562 s]
> [INFO] MicroProfile :: Examples :: Config Source Database . SUCCESS [
> 6.791 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Fault Tolerance :: Fallback
> SUCCESS [ 5.747 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Fault Tolerance :: Retry
> SUCCESS [ 11.280 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Metrics Counted SUCCESS [
> 6.209 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Metrics Histogram SUCCESS [
> 6.105 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Metrics Timed .. SUCCESS [
> 5.966 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MP REST JWT ................. SUCCESS [
> 6.359 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MP REST JWT JWK ............. SUCCESS [
> 6.973 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MP REST JWT Public Key ...... SUCCESS [
> 6.439 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Mockito ........................ SUCCESS [
> 4.170 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MTOM ........................ FAILURE [
> 2.473 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Multiple JPA providers ...... SUCCESS [
> 5.725 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Multiple Arquillian Adapters SUCCESS [
> 17.620 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Multiple TomEE with Arquillian SUCCESS [
> 5.568 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JSF2/CDI/BV/JPA/CODI ........ SUCCESS [
> 0.310 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Persistence Fragment ........ SUCCESS [
> 1.934 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Pojo WS ................. SUCCESS [
> 0.051 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling ..................... SUCCESS [
> 0.030 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Domain ........... SUCCESS [
> 0.479 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Core ............. SUCCESS [
> 2.869 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Web .............. SUCCESS [
> 9.442 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Client ........... SUCCESS [
> 0.068 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: MDB .............. SUCCESS [
> 17.722 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike ProjectStage ..... SUCCESS [
> 9.166 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Quartz ...................... SUCCESS [
> 0.003 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Quartz :: Quartz Resource Adapter SUCCESS [
> 0.016 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Quartz :: Quartz Beans ...... SUCCESS [
> 15.357 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DataSource Realm ............ SUCCESS [
> 0.018 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Reloadable Persistence Unit Properties
> SUCCESS [ 2.626 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Resource Declared In A Webapp SUCCESS [
> 0.036 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST, Mockito and Application Composer
> SUCCESS [ 2.003 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST and Application Composer SUCCESS [
> 1.656 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST CDI .................... SUCCESS [
> 2.272 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JAXRS and JAAS .............. SUCCESS [
> 0.028 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST and EJB ................ SUCCESS [
> 3.614 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: REST Example ............ SUCCESS [
> 5.958 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: REST Example With Application SUCCESS [
> 0.254 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST XML JSON ............... SUCCESS [
> 2.038 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: ScheduleExpression .......... SUCCESS [
> 6.724 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Schedule Events ............ SUCCESS [
> 15.121 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Schedule Methods (Meta) .... SUCCESS [
> 6.695 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Schedule Methods ........... SUCCESS [
> 6.615 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Server Events ............... SUCCESS [
> 1.837 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple CDI Interceptor ...... SUCCESS [
> 1.751 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR .................. SUCCESS [
> 0.004 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Business Model SUCCESS [
> 0.027 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Business Logic SUCCESS [
> 2.383 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Webapp ........ SUCCESS [
> 0.055 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: EAR Packaging . SUCCESS [
> 0.036 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Functional Tests SUCCESS [
> 9.198 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple CMP2 Entity .......... SUCCESS [
> 2.497 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple MDB With a CDI Injection SUCCESS [
> 2.525 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple MDB Example .......... SUCCESS [
> 2.392 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple MDB Using Deployment Descriptor
> Example SUCCESS [ 2.498 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Remote tomcat-users.xml SUCCESS [
> 4.105 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple REST ................. SUCCESS [
> 1.663 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Singleton ............ SUCCESS [
> 1.870 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateful Pojo ........ SUCCESS [
> 1.620 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateful Pojo Callbacks SUCCESS [
> 5.627 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateless Pojo ....... SUCCESS [
> 1.576 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateless Pojo Callbacks SUCCESS [
> 1.692 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateless With Deployment Descriptor
> SUCCESS [ 1.439 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Webservice ........... FAILURE [
> 2.866 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Webservice Without Interface SUCCESS
> [ 2.488 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Spring Data ................. SUCCESS [
> 2.773 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Spring Data Meta ............ SUCCESS [
> 2.742 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Struts .................. SUCCESS [
> 0.133 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Telephone Stateful Pojo ..... SUCCESS [
> 1.976 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: TestCase Injection .......... SUCCESS [
> 2.426 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security (Meta) ..... SUCCESS [
> 2.485 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security ............ SUCCESS [
> 3.122 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security ............ SUCCESS [
> 3.174 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security Service Provider SUCCESS [
> 3.351 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security Script Service Provider
> SUCCESS [ 3.710 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Transactions ........ SUCCESS [
> 2.442 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Transactions BMT .... SUCCESS [
> 2.514 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: TomEE, Jersey, Eclipselink .. SUCCESS [
> 0.384 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Transaction Rollback ........ SUCCESS [
> 3.652 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Troubleshooting ............. SUCCESS [
> 2.646 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Webservice Attachments ...... FAILURE [
> 2.752 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Webservice Inheritance ...... FAILURE [
> 3.214 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService with Security FAILURE [
> 2.931 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService with WS-Security FAILURE
> [ 9.450 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService WS Security with
> resources.xml FAILURE [ 3.060 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Web Service Handlers ........ FAILURE [
> 2.927 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @WebService Holder .......... FAILURE [
> 2.852 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Moviefun ................ SUCCESS [
> 24.335 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Moviefun Rest ........... SUCCESS [
> 12.204 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Provisionning .................. SUCCESS [
> 1.728 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Resources/JMX Example ....... SUCCESS [
> 0.027 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Resources/JMX Example :: EJB Module SUCCESS
> [ 6.557 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Resources/JMX Example :: EAR Module SUCCESS
> [ 0.097 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: WebSocket with tls and basic auth Example
> SUCCESS [ 4.395 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Concurrency utilities example SUCCESS [
> 7.431 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MVC (CXF-based) ............. SUCCESS [
> 17.472 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile REST Client .... SUCCESS [
> 6.099 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MVC (RestEasy-based) ........ SUCCESS [
> 17.132 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Custom HealthCheck .......... SUCCESS [
> 5.848 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile JSONB Configuration SUCCESS [
> 1.673 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile JSONB Custom
> Serializer/Deserializer SUCCESS [ 1.830 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Vaadin LTS V08 .............. SUCCESS [
> 0.672 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Vaadin LTS V10 .............. SUCCESS [
> 0.975 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Vaadin LATEST ............... SUCCESS [
> 0.737 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Azure deployment example .... SUCCESS [
> 3.225 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Fault Tolerance :: Timeout
> SUCCESS [ 6.195 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Java Modules (Simple REST resource)
> SUCCESS [ 5.011 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples ................................ SUCCESS [
> 0.216 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Assembly :: All In One EJB Lite jar ..... SUCCESS [
> 4.330 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: TomEE Webapps-based Deployer EJB SUCCESS [
> 0.187 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK ..................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.014 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: Common ........................... SUCCESS [
> 0.897 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: CDI Embedded ..................... FAILURE [
> 4.249 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: CDI TomEE ........................ FAILURE [01:47
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: Bean Validation Embedded ......... SUCCESS [
> 35.479 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: Bean Validation TomEE ............ SUCCESS [03:36
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile ..................... SUCCESS [
> 0.013 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Config TCK .......... SUCCESS [01:51
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile JWT TCK ............. SUCCESS [
> 35.950 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance TCK . SUCCESS [06:16
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Health TCK .......... SUCCESS [
> 49.656 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Metrics TCK ......... SUCCESS [06:06
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Rest Client TCK ..... SUCCESS [03:31
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Open API TCK ........ SUCCESS [01:44
> min]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Open Tracing TCK .... SUCCESS [
> 24.572 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Webapp Remote SUCCESS [
> 33.123 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests ..... SUCCESS [
> 1.321 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: Web Profile
> SUCCESS [ 43.189 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: JAXRS SUCCESS [
> 24.596 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: JAXWS FAILURE [
> 10.306 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: JMS SUCCESS [
> 8.480 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: CODI SUCCESS [
> 5.988 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: Configuration
> Tests SUCCESS [ 5.936 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Sample :: Moviefun SUCCESS
> [ 19.257 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Arquillian TCK SUCCESS [
> 1.466 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Log4j2 ......................... SUCCESS [
> 0.170 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: webaccess ...................... SUCCESS [
> 8.404 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Overlay Runner ................. SUCCESS [
> 0.185 s]
> [INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Security ....................... SUCCESS [
> 17.312 s]
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 01:13 h
> [INFO] Finished at: 2019-03-06T12:21:45-03:00
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Build is not happy at all yet. :/
> I'll share all test which is failing and some issue that I saw on build
> log.
>
> Em ter, 5 de mar de 2019 às 14:12, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Otávio and folks,
>>
>> That is the issue:
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/BasicURLClassPath.java#L110
>>
>> Seems that we need to change the strategy to work like it:
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/BasicURLClassPath.java#L98-L101
>>
>> I did some changes, but it result in a lot of error, I'm trying see if we
>> can reuse that CustomizableURLClassLoader to be like a "principal" TomEE's
>> ClassLoader.
>>
>> But, the BasicURLClassPath is extended for others:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/SystemClassPath.java#L86
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/TomcatClassPath.java#L208-L230
>> (not sure if should case same issue that otavio got, but probably yes)
>>
>> So, I don't have a solution for it now, still trying understand how TomEE
>> manipulate that classloader.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 12:30, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Yeah.. I was seeing that exactly now. this option was dropped.
>>>
>>> Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 12:23 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> That does not work, there are changes at ClassLoader since Java 9. That
>>>> became forbidden at Java 11, because of these changes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:03 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Otávio,
>>>> >
>>>> > To fix it using jdk flags, you can use --illegal-access
>>>> > Try it.
>>>> >
>>>> > Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 11:54, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>>> > osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Now, I got a new error:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Illegal reflective access by
>>>> > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> (file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
>>>> > > to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>>> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > I got the idea, I'll work on it.
>>>> > > > Thank you.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config
>>>> change
>>>> > > (not
>>>> > > >> a
>>>> > > >> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the
>>>> build
>>>> > on
>>>> > > >> Java 11?
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> Something like:
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> <profiles>
>>>> > > >> <profile>
>>>> > > >> <id>java-11</id>
>>>> > > >> <activation>
>>>> > > >> <jdk>11</jdk>
>>>> > > >> </activation>
>>>> > > >> <build>
>>>> > > >> <plugins>
>>>> > > >> <plugin>
>>>> > > >> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>>>> > > >> <configuration>
>>>> > > >> <compilerArgs>
>>>> > > >> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>>>> > > >> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
>>>> > > >> </compilerArgs>
>>>> > > >> </configuration>
>>>> > > >> </plugin>
>>>> > > >> </profile>
>>>> > > >> </profiles>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> (totally not tested...)
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are
>>>> simply
>>>> > > >> deployed
>>>> > > >> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of
>>>> > TomEE
>>>> > > >> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to
>>>> see
>>>> > if
>>>> > > >> there are any issues.
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> Jon
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>>> > > >> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> > Hey JonG.
>>>> > > >> > Could you explain more about it?
>>>> > > >> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as
>>>> failover.
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and
>>>> create
>>>> > > >> wrapper
>>>> > > >> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> > <profile>
>>>> > > >> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
>>>> > > >> > <modules>
>>>> > > >> > <module>failover</module>
>>>> > > >> > </modules>
>>>> > > >> > </profile>
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>> > > >> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a
>>>> > profile
>>>> > > >> to
>>>> > > >> > add
>>>> > > >> > > that where the Java version is >8.
>>>> > > >> > >
>>>> > > >> > > What do you think?
>>>> > > >> > >
>>>> > > >> > > Jon
>>>> > > >> > >
>>>> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>>> > > >> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >> > >
>>>> > > >> > > > Hey guys
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8
>>>> and
>>>> > Java
>>>> > > >> 11
>>>> > > >> > > > version.
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
>>>> > > >> > > > <
>>>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
>>>> > > >> project
>>>> > > >> > > that
>>>> > > >> > > > has this issue:
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
>>>> > > >> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access
>>>> class
>>>> > > >> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base)
>>>> because
>>>> > > >> module
>>>> > > >> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed
>>>> module
>>>> > > >> > > > @4c6e276e
>>>> > > >> > > > at
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > >
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
>>>> > > >> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > <plugin>
>>>> > > >> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>>>> > > >> > > > <configuration>
>>>> > > >> > > > <compilerArgs>
>>>> > > >> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>>>> > > >> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
>>>> > > >> > > > </compilerArgs>
>>>> > > >> > > > </configuration></plugin>
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > I still working to solve it.
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>> > > >> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
>>>> > > >> > > > >
>>>> > > >>
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
>>>> > > >> > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > Jon
>>>> > > >> > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <
>>>> > james.meen@my-managed.net>
>>>> > > >> > wrote:
>>>> > > >> > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
>>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would
>>>> you be
>>>> > > able
>>>> > > >> > to?
>>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the
>>>> point
>>>> > > it's
>>>> > > >> > > > frozen...
>>>> > > >> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it
>>>> freeze
>>>> > like
>>>> > > >> this
>>>> > > >> > > > > before?
>>>> > > >> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
>>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > > > --
>>>> > > >> > > > > > Sent from:
>>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>>> > > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > > >
>>>> > > >> > > >
>>>> > > >> > >
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi folks,
I spent my night trying make the build happy with Java 11.
It is what I have for now:
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache OpenEJB 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache OpenEJB ..................................... SUCCESS [
1.079 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container ............................... SUCCESS [
0.035 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Loader ..................... SUCCESS [
21.312 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: MBean Annotation API ....... SUCCESS [
0.130 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: JPA Integration ............ SUCCESS [
0.614 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: API ........................ SUCCESS [
0.183 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Java Agent ................. SUCCESS [
0.162 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Java EE .................... SUCCESS [
16.803 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Java EE Accessors .......... SUCCESS [
4.027 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests .................................. SUCCESS [
0.016 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Beans ......................... SUCCESS [
2.016 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Interceptor Beans ............. SUCCESS [
0.319 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Servlets ...................... SUCCESS [
0.256 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Client ........................ SUCCESS [
1.936 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: App ........................... SUCCESS [
0.422 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Failover EJB .................. SUCCESS [
0.106 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: Core ....................... SUCCESS [17:31
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server .................................. SUCCESS [
0.017 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Client ........................ SUCCESS [
12.072 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Core .......................... SUCCESS [
4.368 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Multicast Discovery ........... SUCCESS [
29.229 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: EJBd .......................... SUCCESS [01:39
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Hsql .......................... SUCCESS [
7.048 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Http .......................... SUCCESS [
27.825 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Webservices ................... FAILURE [
1.325 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: CXF Transport ................. SUCCESS [
0.837 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: CXF ........................... FAILURE [
33.957 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: REST .......................... SUCCESS [
1.100 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: CXF RS ........................ SUCCESS [02:20
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Daemon ........................ SUCCESS [
0.420 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Assembly ................................ SUCCESS [
0.013 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Assembly :: Standalone .................. FAILURE [
1.447 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent .............. SUCCESS [
0.011 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Common .... SUCCESS [
0.620 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE ................................... SUCCESS [
0.425 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Util ........................... SUCCESS [
0.318 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: TomEE Common SUCCESS [
1.876 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Failover ...................... SUCCESS [01:21
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Legacy Client ................. SUCCESS [
23.118 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Legacy Server ................. SUCCESS [
1.236 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: iTests :: Web ........................... SUCCESS [
0.219 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Juli ........................... SUCCESS [
18.784 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins ........................... SUCCESS [
0.184 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: Util ................... SUCCESS [
1.204 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Common ......................... SUCCESS [
0.499 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Config ......................... SUCCESS [
0.354 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Loader ......................... SUCCESS [
1.179 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: JDBC ........................... SUCCESS [
9.380 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Catalina ....................... SUCCESS [
1.262 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MyFaces ........................ SUCCESS [
0.485 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Mojarra ........................ SUCCESS [
0.681 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: RS Web Services ................ SUCCESS [
2.441 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Webapp ......................... SUCCESS [
5.723 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Web Services ................... SUCCESS [
1.510 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Microprofile JWT ........................ SUCCESS [
0.732 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MicroProfile ................... SUCCESS [
0.221 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MicroProfile Common ............ SUCCESS [
0.728 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Plus Webapp .................... FAILURE [
3.269 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils ................................... SUCCESS [
0.014 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Core EclipseLink ............... SUCCESS [
0.718 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Plume Webapp ................... FAILURE [
2.375 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: MicroProfile Webapp ............ SUCCESS [
3.221 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Apache TomEE ................... SUCCESS [
35.881 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: TomEE Maven Plugin ..... SUCCESS [
36.853 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: TomEE Embedded ................. FAILURE [
52.706 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: LiveReload ..................... SUCCESS [
0.264 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: TomEE Embedded Maven Plugin SUCCESS [
14.152 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: OpenEJB Embedded Maven Plugin SUCCESS [
2.691 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: TomEE Webapp Archetype . SUCCESS [
0.104 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: jars.txt Maven Plugin .. SUCCESS [
0.375 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Maven Plugins :: ApplicationComposer Maven Plugin SUCCESS
[ 3.752 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Gradle Plugins .......................... SUCCESS [
0.028 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Gradle Plugins :: TomEE Embedded ........ SUCCESS [
0.186 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Container :: JUnit ...................... SUCCESS [
24.370 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: ActiveMQ ...................... SUCCESS [
0.377 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Derby Network Service ......... SUCCESS [
2.984 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Axis .......................... SUCCESS [
2.348 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Common CLI .................... SUCCESS [
4.479 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: SSH ........................... SUCCESS [
3.674 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: BoneCP ........................ SUCCESS [
5.258 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Server :: Hessian ....................... SUCCESS [
6.856 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @AccessTimeout (Meta) ....... SUCCESS [
6.937 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @AccessTimeout .............. SUCCESS [
6.766 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Alternate Descriptors ....... SUCCESS [
2.523 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Application Composer ........ SUCCESS [
1.845 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: ZipLock ... SUCCESS [
2.101 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Application Composer, JAX-WS and CDI are in a
boat SUCCESS [ 2.437 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @ApplicationException inheritance SUCCESS [
1.863 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Transaction Provider
SUCCESS [ 0.252 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Remote .... SUCCESS [
12.873 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Arquillian Persistence Extension Sample
SUCCESS [ 8.340 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Asynchronous Methods ....... SUCCESS [
21.744 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Asynchronous @PostConstrct . SUCCESS [
11.724 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Bean Validation Design By Contract SUCCESS [
2.004 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Stereotypes ............. SUCCESS [
1.960 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Application Scope ....... SUCCESS [
1.917 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Basic CDI ................... SUCCESS [
1.921 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI, EJBContext and JAAS .... SUCCESS [
0.308 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Events .................. SUCCESS [
5.981 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Interceptors ............ SUCCESS [
2.964 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI-Disposes ................ SUCCESS [
1.827 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI-Field Producer .......... SUCCESS [
1.790 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Basic Qualifier ............. SUCCESS [
1.760 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Realm ................... SUCCESS [
5.461 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Request Scope ........... SUCCESS [
1.925 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: CDI Session Scope ........... SUCCESS [
0.427 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Embedded Adaptor SUCCESS [
17.973 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Change JAXWS URL ........ SUCCESS [
4.130 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: EJB 2.1 Component Interfaces SUCCESS [
1.812 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Client Resource Lookup ...... SUCCESS [
0.413 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR .. SUCCESS [
0.008 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: API SUCCESS [
0.101 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: Connector Impl
SUCCESS [ 0.045 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: RAR Packaging
SUCCESS [ 0.051 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: Sample WAR
SUCCESS [ 0.045 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: EAR Packaging
SUCCESS [ 0.166 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in EAR :: Functional
Tests SUCCESS [ 25.056 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Connector Examples :: Connector in WAR .. SUCCESS [
5.857 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Cucumber JVM ................ SUCCESS [
2.230 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Expanded support for Env Entries SUCCESS [
1.770 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Datasource Ciphered Password SUCCESS [
2.284 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Datasource Definition ....... SUCCESS [
1.977 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Datasource Versioning ....... SUCCESS [
7.670 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Decorators .................. SUCCESS [
1.850 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: OpenEJB Container FAILURE [
54.289 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike @ConfigProperty .. SUCCESS [
2.819 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike Exception Handling SUCCESS [
2.767 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JSF2/CDI/BV/JPA/DeltaSpike .. SUCCESS [
6.790 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike I18n ............. SUCCESS [
2.812 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic DAO Implementation .. SUCCESS [
2.785 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic Datasource Routing .. SUCCESS [
2.786 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic Implementation ...... SUCCESS [
1.691 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Dynamic MBean Proxy ......... SUCCESS [
2.184 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Ear Testing ................. SUCCESS [
0.004 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Ear Testing :: Business Model SUCCESS [
0.019 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Ear Testing :: Business Logic SUCCESS [
2.386 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB Examples War ........ SUCCESS [
0.070 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB Remote Call ......... SUCCESS [
0.050 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB Remote Call ......... SUCCESS [
0.051 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService .......... SUCCESS [
0.022 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Groovy CDI .................. SUCCESS [
2.902 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Groovy JPA .................. SUCCESS [
3.638 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Groovy Spock ................ SUCCESS [
3.275 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Hello World - Weblogic ...... SUCCESS [
1.823 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Resource javax.jms.ConnectionFactory SUCCESS
[ 2.293 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Resource DataSource Injection SUCCESS [
1.954 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @EJB Injection .............. SUCCESS [
1.747 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @PersistenceContext EntityManager Injection
SUCCESS [ 2.487 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Resource env-entry Injection SUCCESS [
1.707 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Interceptors ................ SUCCESS [
1.093 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JavaMail API ................ SUCCESS [
1.871 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JPA with EclipseLink ........ FAILURE [
1.660 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Core Hibernate ................. SUCCESS [
0.569 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JPA with Hibernate .......... SUCCESS [
2.621 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JPA @Enumerated ............. SUCCESS [
2.616 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: JSF - ManangedBean and EJB SUCCESS [
0.214 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: JSF - CDI and EJB ....... SUCCESS [
0.159 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @EJB Lookup ................. SUCCESS [
1.744 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: EJB Lookup with descriptor .. SUCCESS [
1.871 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MBean Auto Registration ..... FAILURE [
1.879 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Movies Complete (Meta) ...... SUCCESS [
2.555 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Movies Complete ............. SUCCESS [
2.722 s]
[INFO] MicroProfile :: Examples :: Config ................. SUCCESS [
6.562 s]
[INFO] MicroProfile :: Examples :: Config Source Database . SUCCESS [
6.791 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Fault Tolerance :: Fallback
SUCCESS [ 5.747 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Fault Tolerance :: Retry SUCCESS
[ 11.280 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Metrics Counted SUCCESS [
6.209 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Metrics Histogram SUCCESS [
6.105 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Metrics Timed .. SUCCESS [
5.966 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MP REST JWT ................. SUCCESS [
6.359 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MP REST JWT JWK ............. SUCCESS [
6.973 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MP REST JWT Public Key ...... SUCCESS [
6.439 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Mockito ........................ SUCCESS [
4.170 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MTOM ........................ FAILURE [
2.473 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Multiple JPA providers ...... SUCCESS [
5.725 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Multiple Arquillian Adapters SUCCESS [
17.620 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Multiple TomEE with Arquillian SUCCESS [
5.568 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JSF2/CDI/BV/JPA/CODI ........ SUCCESS [
0.310 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Persistence Fragment ........ SUCCESS [
1.934 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Pojo WS ................. SUCCESS [
0.051 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling ..................... SUCCESS [
0.030 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Domain ........... SUCCESS [
0.479 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Core ............. SUCCESS [
2.869 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Web .............. SUCCESS [
9.442 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Client ........... SUCCESS [
0.068 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: MDB .............. SUCCESS [
17.722 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DeltaSpike ProjectStage ..... SUCCESS [
9.166 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Quartz ...................... SUCCESS [
0.003 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Quartz :: Quartz Resource Adapter SUCCESS [
0.016 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Quartz :: Quartz Beans ...... SUCCESS [
15.357 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: DataSource Realm ............ SUCCESS [
0.018 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Reloadable Persistence Unit Properties
SUCCESS [ 2.626 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Resource Declared In A Webapp SUCCESS [
0.036 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST, Mockito and Application Composer
SUCCESS [ 2.003 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST and Application Composer SUCCESS [
1.656 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST CDI .................... SUCCESS [
2.272 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: JAXRS and JAAS .............. SUCCESS [
0.028 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST and EJB ................ SUCCESS [
3.614 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: REST Example ............ SUCCESS [
5.958 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: REST Example With Application SUCCESS [
0.254 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: REST XML JSON ............... SUCCESS [
2.038 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: ScheduleExpression .......... SUCCESS [
6.724 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Schedule Events ............ SUCCESS [
15.121 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Schedule Methods (Meta) .... SUCCESS [
6.695 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @Schedule Methods ........... SUCCESS [
6.615 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Server Events ............... SUCCESS [
1.837 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple CDI Interceptor ...... SUCCESS [
1.751 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR .................. SUCCESS [
0.004 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Business Model SUCCESS [
0.027 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Business Logic SUCCESS [
2.383 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Webapp ........ SUCCESS [
0.055 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: EAR Packaging . SUCCESS [
0.036 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple EAR :: Functional Tests SUCCESS [
9.198 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple CMP2 Entity .......... SUCCESS [
2.497 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple MDB With a CDI Injection SUCCESS [
2.525 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple MDB Example .......... SUCCESS [
2.392 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple MDB Using Deployment Descriptor
Example SUCCESS [ 2.498 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Remote tomcat-users.xml SUCCESS [
4.105 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple REST ................. SUCCESS [
1.663 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Singleton ............ SUCCESS [
1.870 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateful Pojo ........ SUCCESS [
1.620 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateful Pojo Callbacks SUCCESS [
5.627 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateless Pojo ....... SUCCESS [
1.576 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateless Pojo Callbacks SUCCESS [
1.692 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Stateless With Deployment Descriptor
SUCCESS [ 1.439 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Webservice ........... FAILURE [
2.866 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Simple Webservice Without Interface SUCCESS
[ 2.488 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Spring Data ................. SUCCESS [
2.773 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Spring Data Meta ............ SUCCESS [
2.742 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Struts .................. SUCCESS [
0.133 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Telephone Stateful Pojo ..... SUCCESS [
1.976 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: TestCase Injection .......... SUCCESS [
2.426 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security (Meta) ..... SUCCESS [
2.485 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security ............ SUCCESS [
3.122 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security ............ SUCCESS [
3.174 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security Service Provider SUCCESS [
3.351 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Security Script Service Provider
SUCCESS [ 3.710 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Transactions ........ SUCCESS [
2.442 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Testing Transactions BMT .... SUCCESS [
2.514 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: TomEE, Jersey, Eclipselink .. SUCCESS [
0.384 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Transaction Rollback ........ SUCCESS [
3.652 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Troubleshooting ............. SUCCESS [
2.646 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Webservice Attachments ...... FAILURE [
2.752 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Webservice Inheritance ...... FAILURE [
3.214 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService with Security FAILURE [
2.931 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService with WS-Security FAILURE
[ 9.450 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: EJB WebService WS Security with
resources.xml FAILURE [ 3.060 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Web Service Handlers ........ FAILURE [
2.927 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: @WebService Holder .......... FAILURE [
2.852 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Moviefun ................ SUCCESS [
24.335 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Moviefun Rest ........... SUCCESS [
12.204 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Provisionning .................. SUCCESS [
1.728 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Resources/JMX Example ....... SUCCESS [
0.027 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Resources/JMX Example :: EJB Module SUCCESS
[ 6.557 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Resources/JMX Example :: EAR Module SUCCESS
[ 0.097 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: WebSocket with tls and basic auth Example
SUCCESS [ 4.395 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Concurrency utilities example SUCCESS [
7.431 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MVC (CXF-based) ............. SUCCESS [
17.472 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile REST Client .... SUCCESS [
6.099 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: MVC (RestEasy-based) ........ SUCCESS [
17.132 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Custom HealthCheck .......... SUCCESS [
5.848 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile JSONB Configuration SUCCESS [
1.673 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile JSONB Custom
Serializer/Deserializer SUCCESS [ 1.830 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Vaadin LTS V08 .............. SUCCESS [
0.672 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Vaadin LTS V10 .............. SUCCESS [
0.975 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Vaadin LATEST ............... SUCCESS [
0.737 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Azure deployment example .... SUCCESS [
3.225 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Microprofile Fault Tolerance :: Timeout
SUCCESS [ 6.195 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Web Examples :: Java Modules (Simple REST resource)
SUCCESS [ 5.011 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples ................................ SUCCESS [
0.216 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Assembly :: All In One EJB Lite jar ..... SUCCESS [
4.330 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: TomEE Webapps-based Deployer EJB SUCCESS [
0.187 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK ..................................... SUCCESS [
0.014 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: Common ........................... SUCCESS [
0.897 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: CDI Embedded ..................... FAILURE [
4.249 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: CDI TomEE ........................ FAILURE [01:47
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: Bean Validation Embedded ......... SUCCESS [
35.479 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: Bean Validation TomEE ............ SUCCESS [03:36
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile ..................... SUCCESS [
0.013 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Config TCK .......... SUCCESS [01:51
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile JWT TCK ............. SUCCESS [
35.950 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance TCK . SUCCESS [06:16
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Health TCK .......... SUCCESS [
49.656 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Metrics TCK ......... SUCCESS [06:06
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Rest Client TCK ..... SUCCESS [03:31
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Open API TCK ........ SUCCESS [01:44
min]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Open Tracing TCK .... SUCCESS [
24.572 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Webapp Remote SUCCESS [
33.123 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests ..... SUCCESS [
1.321 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: Web Profile
SUCCESS [ 43.189 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: JAXRS SUCCESS [
24.596 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: JAXWS FAILURE [
10.306 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: JMS SUCCESS [
8.480 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: CODI SUCCESS [
5.988 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Tests :: Configuration
Tests SUCCESS [ 5.936 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Sample :: Moviefun SUCCESS
[ 19.257 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Arquillian Adaptors Parent :: Arquillian TCK SUCCESS [
1.466 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: Utils :: Log4j2 ......................... SUCCESS [
0.170 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: webaccess ...................... SUCCESS [
8.404 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Overlay Runner ................. SUCCESS [
0.185 s]
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TomEE :: Security ....................... SUCCESS [
17.312 s]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 01:13 h
[INFO] Finished at: 2019-03-06T12:21:45-03:00
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Build is not happy at all yet. :/
I'll share all test which is failing and some issue that I saw on build log.
Em ter, 5 de mar de 2019 às 14:12, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
escreveu:
> Hi Otávio and folks,
>
> That is the issue:
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/BasicURLClassPath.java#L110
>
> Seems that we need to change the strategy to work like it:
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/BasicURLClassPath.java#L98-L101
>
> I did some changes, but it result in a lot of error, I'm trying see if we
> can reuse that CustomizableURLClassLoader to be like a "principal" TomEE's
> ClassLoader.
>
> But, the BasicURLClassPath is extended for others:
>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/SystemClassPath.java#L86
>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/TomcatClassPath.java#L208-L230
> (not sure if should case same issue that otavio got, but probably yes)
>
> So, I don't have a solution for it now, still trying understand how TomEE
> manipulate that classloader.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 12:30, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> escreveu:
>
>> Yeah.. I was seeing that exactly now. this option was dropped.
>>
>> Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 12:23 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> That does not work, there are changes at ClassLoader since Java 9. That
>>> became forbidden at Java 11, because of these changes.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:03 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Otávio,
>>> >
>>> > To fix it using jdk flags, you can use --illegal-access
>>> > Try it.
>>> >
>>> > Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 11:54, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> > osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>>> >
>>> > > Now, I got a new error:
>>> > >
>>> > > Illegal reflective access by
>>> > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> (file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
>>> > > to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > I got the idea, I'll work on it.
>>> > > > Thank you.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config
>>> change
>>> > > (not
>>> > > >> a
>>> > > >> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the
>>> build
>>> > on
>>> > > >> Java 11?
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Something like:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> <profiles>
>>> > > >> <profile>
>>> > > >> <id>java-11</id>
>>> > > >> <activation>
>>> > > >> <jdk>11</jdk>
>>> > > >> </activation>
>>> > > >> <build>
>>> > > >> <plugins>
>>> > > >> <plugin>
>>> > > >> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>>> > > >> <configuration>
>>> > > >> <compilerArgs>
>>> > > >> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>>> > > >> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
>>> > > >> </compilerArgs>
>>> > > >> </configuration>
>>> > > >> </plugin>
>>> > > >> </profile>
>>> > > >> </profiles>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> (totally not tested...)
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply
>>> > > >> deployed
>>> > > >> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of
>>> > TomEE
>>> > > >> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to
>>> see
>>> > if
>>> > > >> there are any issues.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Jon
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> > > >> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > Hey JonG.
>>> > > >> > Could you explain more about it?
>>> > > >> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as
>>> failover.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and
>>> create
>>> > > >> wrapper
>>> > > >> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > <profile>
>>> > > >> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
>>> > > >> > <modules>
>>> > > >> > <module>failover</module>
>>> > > >> > </modules>
>>> > > >> > </profile>
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> > > >> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a
>>> > profile
>>> > > >> to
>>> > > >> > add
>>> > > >> > > that where the Java version is >8.
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > What do you think?
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Jon
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> > > >> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > > Hey guys
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8
>>> and
>>> > Java
>>> > > >> 11
>>> > > >> > > > version.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
>>> > > >> > > > <
>>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
>>> > > >> project
>>> > > >> > > that
>>> > > >> > > > has this issue:
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
>>> > > >> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access
>>> class
>>> > > >> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base)
>>> because
>>> > > >> module
>>> > > >> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed
>>> module
>>> > > >> > > > @4c6e276e
>>> > > >> > > > at
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
>>> > > >> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > <plugin>
>>> > > >> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>>> > > >> > > > <configuration>
>>> > > >> > > > <compilerArgs>
>>> > > >> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>>> > > >> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
>>> > > >> > > > </compilerArgs>
>>> > > >> > > > </configuration></plugin>
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > I still working to solve it.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> > > >> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
>>> > > >> > > > >
>>> > > >>
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
>>> > > >> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > Jon
>>> > > >> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <
>>> > james.meen@my-managed.net>
>>> > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > >> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would
>>> you be
>>> > > able
>>> > > >> > to?
>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the
>>> point
>>> > > it's
>>> > > >> > > > frozen...
>>> > > >> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze
>>> > like
>>> > > >> this
>>> > > >> > > > > before?
>>> > > >> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > > > --
>>> > > >> > > > > > Sent from:
>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>> > > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>>> > > >> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi Otávio and folks,
That is the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/BasicURLClassPath.java#L110
Seems that we need to change the strategy to work like it:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/BasicURLClassPath.java#L98-L101
I did some changes, but it result in a lot of error, I'm trying see if we
can reuse that CustomizableURLClassLoader to be like a "principal" TomEE's
ClassLoader.
But, the BasicURLClassPath is extended for others:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/SystemClassPath.java#L86
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-loader/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/loader/TomcatClassPath.java#L208-L230
(not sure if should case same issue that otavio got, but probably yes)
So, I don't have a solution for it now, still trying understand how TomEE
manipulate that classloader.
Thoughts?
Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 12:30, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
escreveu:
> Yeah.. I was seeing that exactly now. this option was dropped.
>
> Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 12:23 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>
>> That does not work, there are changes at ClassLoader since Java 9. That
>> became forbidden at Java 11, because of these changes.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:03 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Otávio,
>> >
>> > To fix it using jdk flags, you can use --illegal-access
>> > Try it.
>> >
>> > Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 11:54, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> > osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>> >
>> > > Now, I got a new error:
>> > >
>> > > Illegal reflective access by
>> > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> (file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
>> > > to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I got the idea, I'll work on it.
>> > > > Thank you.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config
>> change
>> > > (not
>> > > >> a
>> > > >> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the
>> build
>> > on
>> > > >> Java 11?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Something like:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> <profiles>
>> > > >> <profile>
>> > > >> <id>java-11</id>
>> > > >> <activation>
>> > > >> <jdk>11</jdk>
>> > > >> </activation>
>> > > >> <build>
>> > > >> <plugins>
>> > > >> <plugin>
>> > > >> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>> > > >> <configuration>
>> > > >> <compilerArgs>
>> > > >> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>> > > >> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
>> > > >> </compilerArgs>
>> > > >> </configuration>
>> > > >> </plugin>
>> > > >> </profile>
>> > > >> </profiles>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> (totally not tested...)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply
>> > > >> deployed
>> > > >> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of
>> > TomEE
>> > > >> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to
>> see
>> > if
>> > > >> there are any issues.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Jon
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> > > >> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Hey JonG.
>> > > >> > Could you explain more about it?
>> > > >> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as
>> failover.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and
>> create
>> > > >> wrapper
>> > > >> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > <profile>
>> > > >> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
>> > > >> > <modules>
>> > > >> > <module>failover</module>
>> > > >> > </modules>
>> > > >> > </profile>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > > >> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a
>> > profile
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> > add
>> > > >> > > that where the Java version is >8.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > What do you think?
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Jon
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> > > >> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > Hey guys
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and
>> > Java
>> > > >> 11
>> > > >> > > > version.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
>> > > >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover
>> >
>> > > >> project
>> > > >> > > that
>> > > >> > > > has this issue:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
>> > > >> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access
>> class
>> > > >> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base)
>> because
>> > > >> module
>> > > >> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed
>> module
>> > > >> > > > @4c6e276e
>> > > >> > > > at
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
>> > > >> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > <plugin>
>> > > >> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>> > > >> > > > <configuration>
>> > > >> > > > <compilerArgs>
>> > > >> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>> > > >> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
>> > > >> > > > </compilerArgs>
>> > > >> > > > </configuration></plugin>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > I still working to solve it.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > > >> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Jon
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <
>> > james.meen@my-managed.net>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you
>> be
>> > > able
>> > > >> > to?
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the
>> point
>> > > it's
>> > > >> > > > frozen...
>> > > >> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze
>> > like
>> > > >> this
>> > > >> > > > > before?
>> > > >> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > --
>> > > >> > > > > > Sent from:
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> >
>>
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Yeah.. I was seeing that exactly now. this option was dropped.
Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 12:23 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
> That does not work, there are changes at ClassLoader since Java 9. That
> became forbidden at Java 11, because of these changes.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:03 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Otávio,
> >
> > To fix it using jdk flags, you can use --illegal-access
> > Try it.
> >
> > Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 11:54, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
> >
> > > Now, I got a new error:
> > >
> > > Illegal reflective access by
> > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
> > >
> > >
> >
> (file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
> > > to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I got the idea, I'll work on it.
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config change
> > > (not
> > > >> a
> > > >> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
> > > >>
> > > >> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the
> build
> > on
> > > >> Java 11?
> > > >>
> > > >> Something like:
> > > >>
> > > >> <profiles>
> > > >> <profile>
> > > >> <id>java-11</id>
> > > >> <activation>
> > > >> <jdk>11</jdk>
> > > >> </activation>
> > > >> <build>
> > > >> <plugins>
> > > >> <plugin>
> > > >> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> > > >> <configuration>
> > > >> <compilerArgs>
> > > >> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> > > >> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
> > > >> </compilerArgs>
> > > >> </configuration>
> > > >> </plugin>
> > > >> </profile>
> > > >> </profiles>
> > > >>
> > > >> (totally not tested...)
> > > >>
> > > >> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply
> > > >> deployed
> > > >> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of
> > TomEE
> > > >> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to see
> > if
> > > >> there are any issues.
> > > >>
> > > >> Jon
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > > >> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hey JonG.
> > > >> > Could you explain more about it?
> > > >> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as
> failover.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and
> create
> > > >> wrapper
> > > >> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > <profile>
> > > >> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
> > > >> > <modules>
> > > >> > <module>failover</module>
> > > >> > </modules>
> > > >> > </profile>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > >> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a
> > profile
> > > >> to
> > > >> > add
> > > >> > > that where the Java version is >8.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > What do you think?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Jon
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > > >> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Hey guys
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and
> > Java
> > > >> 11
> > > >> > > > version.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
> > > >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
> > > >> project
> > > >> > > that
> > > >> > > > has this issue:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> > > >> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access
> class
> > > >> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because
> > > >> module
> > > >> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed
> module
> > > >> > > > @4c6e276e
> > > >> > > > at
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> > > >> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > <plugin>
> > > >> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> > > >> > > > <configuration>
> > > >> > > > <compilerArgs>
> > > >> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> > > >> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> > > >> > > > </compilerArgs>
> > > >> > > > </configuration></plugin>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I still working to solve it.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > >> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Jon
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <
> > james.meen@my-managed.net>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you
> be
> > > able
> > > >> > to?
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point
> > > it's
> > > >> > > > frozen...
> > > >> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze
> > like
> > > >> this
> > > >> > > > > before?
> > > >> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > Sent from:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <os...@tomitribe.com>.
That does not work, there are changes at ClassLoader since Java 9. That
became forbidden at Java 11, because of these changes.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:03 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Otávio,
>
> To fix it using jdk flags, you can use --illegal-access
> Try it.
>
> Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 11:54, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>
> > Now, I got a new error:
> >
> > Illegal reflective access by
> org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
> >
> >
> (file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
> > to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I got the idea, I'll work on it.
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config change
> > (not
> > >> a
> > >> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
> > >>
> > >> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the build
> on
> > >> Java 11?
> > >>
> > >> Something like:
> > >>
> > >> <profiles>
> > >> <profile>
> > >> <id>java-11</id>
> > >> <activation>
> > >> <jdk>11</jdk>
> > >> </activation>
> > >> <build>
> > >> <plugins>
> > >> <plugin>
> > >> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> > >> <configuration>
> > >> <compilerArgs>
> > >> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> > >> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
> > >> </compilerArgs>
> > >> </configuration>
> > >> </plugin>
> > >> </profile>
> > >> </profiles>
> > >>
> > >> (totally not tested...)
> > >>
> > >> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply
> > >> deployed
> > >> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of
> TomEE
> > >> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to see
> if
> > >> there are any issues.
> > >>
> > >> Jon
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > >> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hey JonG.
> > >> > Could you explain more about it?
> > >> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as failover.
> > >> >
> > >> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and create
> > >> wrapper
> > >> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
> > >> >
> > >> > <profile>
> > >> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
> > >> > <modules>
> > >> > <module>failover</module>
> > >> > </modules>
> > >> > </profile>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > >> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a
> profile
> > >> to
> > >> > add
> > >> > > that where the Java version is >8.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > What do you think?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Jon
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > >> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hey guys
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and
> Java
> > >> 11
> > >> > > > version.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
> > >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
> > >> project
> > >> > > that
> > >> > > > has this issue:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> > >> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
> > >> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because
> > >> module
> > >> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
> > >> > > > @4c6e276e
> > >> > > > at
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> > >> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > <plugin>
> > >> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> > >> > > > <configuration>
> > >> > > > <compilerArgs>
> > >> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> > >> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> > >> > > > </compilerArgs>
> > >> > > > </configuration></plugin>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I still working to solve it.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > >> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Jon
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <
> james.meen@my-managed.net>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be
> > able
> > >> > to?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point
> > it's
> > >> > > > frozen...
> > >> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze
> like
> > >> this
> > >> > > > > before?
> > >> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > Sent from:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi Otávio,
To fix it using jdk flags, you can use --illegal-access
Try it.
Em seg, 4 de mar de 2019 às 11:54, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osantana@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
> Now, I got a new error:
>
> Illegal reflective access by org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
>
> (file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
> to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > I got the idea, I'll work on it.
> > Thank you.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config change
> (not
> >> a
> >> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
> >>
> >> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the build on
> >> Java 11?
> >>
> >> Something like:
> >>
> >> <profiles>
> >> <profile>
> >> <id>java-11</id>
> >> <activation>
> >> <jdk>11</jdk>
> >> </activation>
> >> <build>
> >> <plugins>
> >> <plugin>
> >> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> >> <configuration>
> >> <compilerArgs>
> >> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> >> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
> >> </compilerArgs>
> >> </configuration>
> >> </plugin>
> >> </profile>
> >> </profiles>
> >>
> >> (totally not tested...)
> >>
> >> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply
> >> deployed
> >> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of TomEE
> >> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to see if
> >> there are any issues.
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> >> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey JonG.
> >> > Could you explain more about it?
> >> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as failover.
> >> >
> >> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and create
> >> wrapper
> >> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
> >> >
> >> > <profile>
> >> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
> >> > <modules>
> >> > <module>failover</module>
> >> > </modules>
> >> > </profile>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a profile
> >> to
> >> > add
> >> > > that where the Java version is >8.
> >> > >
> >> > > What do you think?
> >> > >
> >> > > Jon
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> >> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hey guys
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java
> >> 11
> >> > > > version.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
> >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
> >> project
> >> > > that
> >> > > > has this issue:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> >> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
> >> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because
> >> module
> >> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
> >> > > > @4c6e276e
> >> > > > at
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> >> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > <plugin>
> >> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> >> > > > <configuration>
> >> > > > <compilerArgs>
> >> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> >> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> >> > > > </compilerArgs>
> >> > > > </configuration></plugin>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I still working to solve it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> >> > > > >
> >> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Jon
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be
> able
> >> > to?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point
> it's
> >> > > > frozen...
> >> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like
> >> this
> >> > > > > before?
> >> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Sent from:
> >> > > > > >
> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <os...@tomitribe.com>.
That looks illegal access is forbidden at Java 11.
I'm working on it.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:54 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> Now, I got a new error:
>
> Illegal reflective access by org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
> (file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
> to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
>> I got the idea, I'll work on it.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config change
>>> (not a
>>> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
>>>
>>> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the build on
>>> Java 11?
>>>
>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> <profiles>
>>> <profile>
>>> <id>java-11</id>
>>> <activation>
>>> <jdk>11</jdk>
>>> </activation>
>>> <build>
>>> <plugins>
>>> <plugin>
>>> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>>> <configuration>
>>> <compilerArgs>
>>> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>>> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
>>> </compilerArgs>
>>> </configuration>
>>> </plugin>
>>> </profile>
>>> </profiles>
>>>
>>> (totally not tested...)
>>>
>>> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply
>>> deployed
>>> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of TomEE
>>> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to see if
>>> there are any issues.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hey JonG.
>>> > Could you explain more about it?
>>> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as failover.
>>> >
>>> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and create
>>> wrapper
>>> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
>>> >
>>> > <profile>
>>> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
>>> > <modules>
>>> > <module>failover</module>
>>> > </modules>
>>> > </profile>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a profile
>>> to
>>> > add
>>> > > that where the Java version is >8.
>>> > >
>>> > > What do you think?
>>> > >
>>> > > Jon
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hey guys
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java
>>> 11
>>> > > > version.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
>>> > > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
>>> project
>>> > > that
>>> > > > has this issue:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
>>> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
>>> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because
>>> module
>>> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
>>> > > > @4c6e276e
>>> > > > at
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
>>> > > >
>>> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
>>> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > <plugin>
>>> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>>> > > > <configuration>
>>> > > > <compilerArgs>
>>> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>>> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
>>> > > > </compilerArgs>
>>> > > > </configuration></plugin>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I still working to solve it.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
>>> > > > >
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Jon
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be
>>> able
>>> > to?
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's
>>> > > > frozen...
>>> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like
>>> this
>>> > > > > before?
>>> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > Sent from:
>>> > > > > >
>>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <os...@tomitribe.com>.
Now, I got a new error:
Illegal reflective access by org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath$4
(file:/tmp/temp14662460932513193953dir/root/lib/openejb-loader-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
to field java.net.URLClassLoader.ucp
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:49 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> I got the idea, I'll work on it.
> Thank you.
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config change (not
>> a
>> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
>>
>> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the build on
>> Java 11?
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> <profiles>
>> <profile>
>> <id>java-11</id>
>> <activation>
>> <jdk>11</jdk>
>> </activation>
>> <build>
>> <plugins>
>> <plugin>
>> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>> <configuration>
>> <compilerArgs>
>> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
>> </compilerArgs>
>> </configuration>
>> </plugin>
>> </profile>
>> </profiles>
>>
>> (totally not tested...)
>>
>> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply
>> deployed
>> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of TomEE
>> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to see if
>> there are any issues.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey JonG.
>> > Could you explain more about it?
>> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as failover.
>> >
>> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and create
>> wrapper
>> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
>> >
>> > <profile>
>> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
>> > <modules>
>> > <module>failover</module>
>> > </modules>
>> > </profile>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a profile
>> to
>> > add
>> > > that where the Java version is >8.
>> > >
>> > > What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > Jon
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey guys
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java
>> 11
>> > > > version.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
>> > > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
>> project
>> > > that
>> > > > has this issue:
>> > > >
>> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
>> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
>> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because
>> module
>> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
>> > > > @4c6e276e
>> > > > at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
>> > > >
>> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
>> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > <plugin>
>> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>> > > > <configuration>
>> > > > <compilerArgs>
>> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
>> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
>> > > > </compilerArgs>
>> > > > </configuration></plugin>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
>> > > >
>> > > > I still working to solve it.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
>> > > > >
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Jon
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able
>> > to?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's
>> > > > frozen...
>> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like
>> this
>> > > > > before?
>> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Sent from:
>> > > > > >
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <os...@tomitribe.com>.
I got the idea, I'll work on it.
Thank you.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config change (not a
> code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
>
> If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the build on
> Java 11?
>
> Something like:
>
> <profiles>
> <profile>
> <id>java-11</id>
> <activation>
> <jdk>11</jdk>
> </activation>
> <build>
> <plugins>
> <plugin>
> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> <configuration>
> <compilerArgs>
> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> <arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
> </compilerArgs>
> </configuration>
> </plugin>
> </profile>
> </profiles>
>
> (totally not tested...)
>
> Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply deployed
> and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of TomEE
> itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to see if
> there are any issues.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey JonG.
> > Could you explain more about it?
> > Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as failover.
> >
> > I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and create
> wrapper
> > the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
> >
> > <profile>
> > <id>skip-java-11</id>
> > <modules>
> > <module>failover</module>
> > </modules>
> > </profile>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a profile to
> > add
> > > that where the Java version is >8.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey guys
> > > >
> > > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java 11
> > > > version.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right now, I'm at the failover
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover>
> project
> > > that
> > > > has this issue:
> > > >
> > > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> > > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
> > > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because module
> > > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
> > > > @4c6e276e
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are two ways to solve it;
> > > >
> > > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> > > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <plugin>
> > > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> > > > <configuration>
> > > > <compilerArgs>
> > > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> > > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> > > > </compilerArgs>
> > > > </configuration></plugin>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
> > > >
> > > > I still working to solve it.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> > > > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> > > > >
> > > > > Jon
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able
> > to?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's
> > > > frozen...
> > > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like
> this
> > > > > before?
> > > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Sent from:
> > > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
It sounded like you could make it work with a compiler config change (not a
code change) in Java 11 - is that correct?
If so, can't you just provide that config only when running the build on
Java 11?
Something like:
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>java-11</id>
<activation>
<jdk>11</jdk>
</activation>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<compilerArgs>
<arg>--add-modules</arg>
<arg>jdk.internal.loader</arg>
</compilerArgs>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</profile>
</profiles>
(totally not tested...)
Does that make sense? The failover artifacts themselves are simply deployed
and run as part of a test suite, so we don't ship them as part of TomEE
itself. Its desirable to run the itests on both Java 8 and 11 to see if
there are any issues.
Jon
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hey JonG.
> Could you explain more about it?
> Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as failover.
>
> I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and create wrapper
> the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
>
> <profile>
> <id>skip-java-11</id>
> <modules>
> <module>failover</module>
> </modules>
> </profile>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a profile to
> add
> > that where the Java version is >8.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey guys
> > >
> > > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java 11
> > > version.
> > >
> > >
> > > Right now, I'm at the failover
> > > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover> project
> > that
> > > has this issue:
> > >
> > > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> > > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
> > > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because module
> > > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
> > > @4c6e276e
> > > at
> > >
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
> > >
> > >
> > > There are two ways to solve it;
> > >
> > > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> > > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
> > >
> > >
> > > <plugin>
> > > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> > > <configuration>
> > > <compilerArgs>
> > > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> > > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> > > </compilerArgs>
> > > </configuration></plugin>
> > >
> > >
> > > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
> > >
> > > I still working to solve it.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> > > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able
> to?
> > > > >
> > > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's
> > > frozen...
> > > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this
> > > > before?
> > > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sent from:
> > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <os...@tomitribe.com>.
Hey JonG.
Could you explain more about it?
Do you mean, create a profile to skip this project such as failover.
I’ve checked some options such as redesign the classpath and create wrapper
the BasicURLClass. Both with a huge change of code.
<profile>
<id>skip-java-11</id>
<modules>
<module>failover</module>
</modules>
</profile>
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a profile to add
> that where the Java version is >8.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys
> >
> > I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java 11
> > version.
> >
> >
> > Right now, I'm at the failover
> > <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover> project
> that
> > has this issue:
> >
> > java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> > org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
> > jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because module
> > java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
> > @4c6e276e
> > at
> >
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
> >
> >
> > There are two ways to solve it;
> >
> > - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> > - Using the add-module argument at maven.
> >
> >
> > <plugin>
> > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> > <configuration>
> > <compilerArgs>
> > <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> > <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> > </compilerArgs>
> > </configuration></plugin>
> >
> >
> > However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
> >
> > I still working to solve it.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> > > >
> > > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able to?
> > > >
> > > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's
> > frozen...
> > > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this
> > > before?
> > > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sent from:
> > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
If that's just for itests, I'd be inclined to try creating a profile to add
that where the Java version is >8.
What do you think?
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:16 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java 11
> version.
>
>
> Right now, I'm at the failover
> <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover> project that
> has this issue:
>
> java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
> jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because module
> java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
> @4c6e276e
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
>
>
> There are two ways to solve it;
>
> - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> - Using the add-module argument at maven.
>
>
> <plugin>
> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> <configuration>
> <compilerArgs>
> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> </compilerArgs>
> </configuration></plugin>
>
>
> However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
>
> I still working to solve it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> > >
> > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able to?
> > >
> > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's
> frozen...
> > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this
> > before?
> > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent from:
> > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> > >
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Nice, thanks for looking at that!
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, 18:16 Otávio Gonçalves de Santana, <
osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java 11
> version.
>
>
> Right now, I'm at the failover
> <https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover> project that
> has this issue:
>
> java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
> org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
> jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because module
> java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
> @4c6e276e
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
>
>
> There are two ways to solve it;
>
> - the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
> - Using the add-module argument at maven.
>
>
> <plugin>
> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
> <configuration>
> <compilerArgs>
> <arg>--add-modules</arg>
> <arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
> </compilerArgs>
> </configuration></plugin>
>
>
> However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
>
> I still working to solve it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> > >
> > > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able to?
> > >
> > > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's
> frozen...
> > > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this
> > before?
> > > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent from:
> > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> > >
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <os...@tomitribe.com>.
Hey guys
I'm working to make the tests compatible with both Java 8 and Java 11
version.
Right now, I'm at the failover
<https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/itests/failover> project that
has this issue:
java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class
org.apache.openejb.loader.BasicURLClassPath cannot access class
jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath (in module java.base) because module
java.base does not export jdk.internal.loader to unnamed module
@4c6e276e
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:361)
There are two ways to solve it;
- the first one is using the filemodule-info.java
- Using the add-module argument at maven.
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<compilerArgs>
<arg>--add-modules</arg>
<arg>dk.internal.loader</arg>
</compilerArgs>
</configuration></plugin>
However, both make unavailable the situation to run Java 8.
I still working to solve it.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>
> > Ah yeah that makes sense.
> >
> > It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able to?
> >
> > From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's frozen...
> > I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this
> before?
> > Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Killed of the builds and forced a new one.
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1048
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> Ah yeah that makes sense.
>
> It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able to?
>
> From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's frozen...
> I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this before?
> Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by César Hernández Mendoza <ce...@gmail.com>.
>
> I'll propose merging this to master and setting up a Java 11
> build to run alongside the Java 8. That should enable folks to look at test
> issues on master.
+1 , I'm also willing to help with test fixes related to Java 11.
El vie., 1 mar. 2019 a las 10:28, j4fm (<ja...@my-managed.net>)
escribió:
> Ah yeah that makes sense.
>
> It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able to?
>
> From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's frozen...
> I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this before?
> Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Atentamente:
César Hernández Mendoza.
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Ah yeah that makes sense.
It won't let me stop the current stuck build. Would you be able to?
From the logs it looks like it succeeds up until the point it's frozen...
I'm not sure what's up with it. Have you seen it freeze like this before?
Maybe it's an issue with the CI agent instead?
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
The tests you copied out do not look like they failed on buildbot or locally.
There are no failures so far and it's quite far along. It's appears to just
be slow.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
My Java 8 build is still running here. Its currently on the CDI TCK, and so
far 4 reported test failures:
[ERROR]
run(org.apache.openejb.resource.activemq.ProperConnectionShutdownTest)
Time elapsed: 3.295 s <<< FAILURE!
org.superbiz.executor.ManagedScheduledServiceTest Time elapsed: 3.872 sec
<<< ERROR!
org.superbiz.executor.ManagedServiceTest Time elapsed: 0.482 sec <<<
ERROR!
org.superbiz.executor.ThreadFactoryServiceTest Time elapsed: 0.464 sec
<<< ERROR!
There's a number of failures in the CDI module, so I'm anticipating a
longer list at the end. I'm seeing at least 25 so far.
I'll post my results.
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:25 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:14 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>
>> I would be happy to pull your PR and build against JDK 11 before
>> merging. I
>> can start that build now.
>>
>
> Bigger concern is that builds against Java 8, and is green with Java 8. I
> think your recent changes make that more likely to succeed (thanks!). I
> know the build without tests works JDK 11, but I imagine we'll have some
> test failures on Java 11. Last run, this was the set:
> https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
>
> I see the goal for merge being a green build against Java 8. Getting this
> merged to master enables others to help with test fixing. We have at least
> Otavio and Dani looking at that, and I'm sure other will be interested in
> helping.
>
>
>>
>> I see buildbot seems to have frozen. I think really my PR 419 should run
>> before the current 409 because the former is mostly prep for the latter.
>>
>> If you are okay with it, I will click stop (if it lets me) on the current
>> build and let the two PRs run together?
>>
>
> Go for it. If it doesn't work, let me know and I'll kill stuff off and
> force a new build.
>
> Jon
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>>
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:14 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> I would be happy to pull your PR and build against JDK 11 before merging.
> I
> can start that build now.
>
Bigger concern is that builds against Java 8, and is green with Java 8. I
think your recent changes make that more likely to succeed (thanks!). I
know the build without tests works JDK 11, but I imagine we'll have some
test failures on Java 11. Last run, this was the set:
https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
I see the goal for merge being a green build against Java 8. Getting this
merged to master enables others to help with test fixing. We have at least
Otavio and Dani looking at that, and I'm sure other will be interested in
helping.
>
> I see buildbot seems to have frozen. I think really my PR 419 should run
> before the current 409 because the former is mostly prep for the latter.
>
> If you are okay with it, I will click stop (if it lets me) on the current
> build and let the two PRs run together?
>
Go for it. If it doesn't work, let me know and I'll kill stuff off and
force a new build.
Jon
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
I would be happy to pull your PR and build against JDK 11 before merging. I
can start that build now.
I see buildbot seems to have frozen. I think really my PR 419 should run
before the current 409 because the former is mostly prep for the latter.
If you are okay with it, I will click stop (if it lets me) on the current
build and let the two PRs run together?
Thanks
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
I've cleaned up this branch so the dependencies should now be correct (and
minimal). I'm currently running a Java 8 full build with tests. Assuming
that works, I'll propose merging this to master and setting up a Java 11
build to run alongside the Java 8. That should enable folks to look at test
issues on master.
I'm hoping CXF and recent microprofile component updates will fix some of
the test issues.
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:05 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah... it'll take a few hours for those to run through. Thanks for the
> PRs and for keeping an eye out on the build, its much appreciated.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jon. I'm keeping an eye on each run on buildbot. Maybe I should
>> go
>> out for a while ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>>
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Yeah... it'll take a few hours for those to run through. Thanks for the PRs
and for keeping an eye out on the build, its much appreciated.
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> Thanks Jon. I'm keeping an eye on each run on buildbot. Maybe I should go
> out for a while ;)
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Thanks Jon. I'm keeping an eye on each run on buildbot. Maybe I should go
out for a while ;)
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
418 is merged... looking at 424 now.
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:53 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> Thanks for the merges, hopefully will save time. Could I make a shameless
> request for 418 too? (and 424 if poss) :D
>
> I'm going to keep a close eye on buildbot too, just in case.
>
> James
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Thanks for the merges, hopefully will save time. Could I make a shameless
request for 418 too? (and 424 if poss) :D
I'm going to keep a close eye on buildbot too, just in case.
James
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
I've merged those 2 PRs in. Let's see what the actual diff is for my branch
now.
Jon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:28 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osantana@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hey JonG,
> What do you think if you move this branch to the TomEE project?
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:40 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > Great job Jon.
> > I did some tests so, so we should be able to get something green
> hopefully
> > soon
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:17 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jon,
> > >
> > > fantastic! I'll take a look on it.
> > >
> > > Nice work!
> > >
> > > Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 13:26, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our
> > build
> > > > to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a
> > branch
> > > > which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can.
> > > >
> > > > My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and
> broadly
> > > > speaking, adds these modules:
> > > >
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
> > > > <version>2.3.0</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> > > > <version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
> > > > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > > > <type>pom</type>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>rt</artifactId>
> > > > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.jacorb</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jacorb</artifactId>
> > > > <version>3.9</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.0.6.Final</version>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > >
> > > > There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in
> the
> > > > output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is
> > getting
> > > > almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to
> pass.
> > > > Here's my current failures:
> > > > https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
> > > >
> > > > In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included
> are:
> > > >
> > > > FastInfoSet-1.2.15
> > > > gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001
> > > > ha-api-3.1.9
> > > > istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7
> > > > jacorb-3.9
> > > > jacorb-omgapi-3.9
> > > > javax.activation-1.2.0
> > > > javax.activation-api-1.2.0
> > > > javax.annotation-api-1.3.2
> > > > javax.jws-api-1.1
> > > > javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0
> > > > jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > > > jaxws-api
> > > > jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec
> > > > management-api-3.0.0-b012
> > > > mimepull-1.9.10
> > > > policy-2.7.5
> > > > rt-2.3.1
> > > > saaj-impl-1.5.0
> > > > stax-ex-1.8
> > > > stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4)
> > > > streambuffer-1.5.6
> > > > txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > > > woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3)
> > > > xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3)
> > > >
> > > > These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of
> > > > dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be
> removed,
> > > but
> > > > I'll need to work through them to figure out what.
> > > >
> > > > If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most
> > > welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > >
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <os...@tomitribe.com>.
Hey JonG,
What do you think if you move this branch to the TomEE project?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:40 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Great job Jon.
> I did some tests so, so we should be able to get something green hopefully
> soon
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:17 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > fantastic! I'll take a look on it.
> >
> > Nice work!
> >
> > Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 13:26, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> > > Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our
> build
> > > to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a
> branch
> > > which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can.
> > >
> > > My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and broadly
> > > speaking, adds these modules:
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.3.0</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > > <type>pom</type>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>rt</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.jacorb</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jacorb</artifactId>
> > > <version>3.9</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.0.6.Final</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in the
> > > output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is
> getting
> > > almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to pass.
> > > Here's my current failures:
> > > https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
> > >
> > > In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included are:
> > >
> > > FastInfoSet-1.2.15
> > > gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001
> > > ha-api-3.1.9
> > > istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7
> > > jacorb-3.9
> > > jacorb-omgapi-3.9
> > > javax.activation-1.2.0
> > > javax.activation-api-1.2.0
> > > javax.annotation-api-1.3.2
> > > javax.jws-api-1.1
> > > javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0
> > > jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > > jaxws-api
> > > jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec
> > > management-api-3.0.0-b012
> > > mimepull-1.9.10
> > > policy-2.7.5
> > > rt-2.3.1
> > > saaj-impl-1.5.0
> > > stax-ex-1.8
> > > stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4)
> > > streambuffer-1.5.6
> > > txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > > woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3)
> > > xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3)
> > >
> > > These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of
> > > dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be removed,
> > but
> > > I'll need to work through them to figure out what.
> > >
> > > If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most
> > welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Great job Jon.
I did some tests so, so we should be able to get something green hopefully
soon
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:17 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> fantastic! I'll take a look on it.
>
> Nice work!
>
> Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 13:26, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our build
> > to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a branch
> > which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can.
> >
> > My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and broadly
> > speaking, adds these modules:
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
> > <version>2.3.0</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> > <version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
> > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > <type>pom</type>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> > <artifactId>rt</artifactId>
> > <version>2.3.1</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
> > <artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
> > <artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.0</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.jacorb</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jacorb</artifactId>
> > <version>3.9</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId>
> > <version>1.0.6.Final</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in the
> > output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is getting
> > almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to pass.
> > Here's my current failures:
> > https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
> >
> > In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included are:
> >
> > FastInfoSet-1.2.15
> > gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001
> > ha-api-3.1.9
> > istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7
> > jacorb-3.9
> > jacorb-omgapi-3.9
> > javax.activation-1.2.0
> > javax.activation-api-1.2.0
> > javax.annotation-api-1.3.2
> > javax.jws-api-1.1
> > javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0
> > jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > jaxws-api
> > jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec
> > management-api-3.0.0-b012
> > mimepull-1.9.10
> > policy-2.7.5
> > rt-2.3.1
> > saaj-impl-1.5.0
> > stax-ex-1.8
> > stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4)
> > streambuffer-1.5.6
> > txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3)
> > xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3)
> >
> > These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of
> > dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be removed,
> but
> > I'll need to work through them to figure out what.
> >
> > If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most
> welcome.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jon
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: Building with Java 11
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi Jon,
fantastic! I'll take a look on it.
Nice work!
Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 13:26, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our build
> to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a branch
> which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can.
>
> My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and broadly
> speaking, adds these modules:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
> <artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
> <version>2.3.0</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> <version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> <artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
> <version>2.3.1</version>
> <type>pom</type>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> <artifactId>rt</artifactId>
> <version>2.3.1</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
> <artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.0</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
> <artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.0</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.jacorb</groupId>
> <artifactId>jacorb</artifactId>
> <version>3.9</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId>
> <artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId>
> <version>1.0.6.Final</version>
> </dependency>
>
> There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in the
> output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is getting
> almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to pass.
> Here's my current failures:
> https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
>
> In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included are:
>
> FastInfoSet-1.2.15
> gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001
> ha-api-3.1.9
> istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7
> jacorb-3.9
> jacorb-omgapi-3.9
> javax.activation-1.2.0
> javax.activation-api-1.2.0
> javax.annotation-api-1.3.2
> javax.jws-api-1.1
> javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0
> jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> jaxws-api
> jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec
> management-api-3.0.0-b012
> mimepull-1.9.10
> policy-2.7.5
> rt-2.3.1
> saaj-impl-1.5.0
> stax-ex-1.8
> stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4)
> streambuffer-1.5.6
> txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3)
> xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3)
>
> These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of
> dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be removed, but
> I'll need to work through them to figure out what.
>
> If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most welcome.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_