You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by "Fogleson, Allen" <al...@daugherty.com> on 2005/04/05 22:39:14 UTC
RE: [OT] RE: AW: JSF (the same old stuff?). We prefer Laszlo +Struts
Ohh I agree that Laszlo is pure view stuff. My contention is that
because it is it doesn't belong in struts core really at all, but it is
possible that a contrib module that integrates Laszlo into struts is
possible.
Al
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [OT] RE: AW: JSF (the same old stuff?). We prefer Laszlo +Struts
Posted by Dakota Jack <da...@gmail.com>.
What is odd about this is that using something like Lazlo, if you know
what you are doing, is just using code. Why would you tell a client
if you wanted to use some code? What if you coded it yourself? Then
could you use it? Do you understand what I am wondering?
Jack
On Apr 5, 2005 1:39 PM, Fogleson, Allen <al...@daugherty.com> wrote:
> Ohh I agree that Laszlo is pure view stuff. My contention is that
> because it is it doesn't belong in struts core really at all, but it is
> possible that a contrib module that integrates Laszlo into struts is
> possible.
>
> Al
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org