Extra feature dependency in the TextMarker Feature

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

The textmarker doesn't need to depend on org.apache.uima.runtime, because the
other feature it depends on includes that.

-Marshall

On 2/1/2013 8:15 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the third release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-192/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3
>
>
> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
> textmarker-2.0.0:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/eclipse-update-site
>
>
> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
> They can also be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>
>
> Archive with all sources (also present in the staging repository):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ]  0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>